I was mostly referring to the lack of commercial shipyards. Any ship building at Lunber is by and for government use, and is, for the most part, a whopping TL9.
Hmm. Nishlishurkha, next to Lunber, sees a hundred-fold increase in population from 990 to 1105. That many people would still be lost in the round-off for Lunber, and too much for Nish to do on its own, so I suspect Lunber is dumping populace in a power play for the neighboring system, and the League keeps soaking them up like Groucho's Stateroom scene in A Night at the Opera. Perhaps Lunber was shipping people by the thousands as fast as they could build deathtrap... er, "colonial transports" and the League offered Nish membership to counter the population shuffle play. The peasants of Lunber think Nish is a prison colony, but the locals, with fairly high end fabrication tech and plenty of space, just kept building towns and filling them with "refugees".
But a LOT of TL 9.
I see that you’re using the 990 QLI population data in the Glimmerdrift from travellermap and building the story of how it changes over 115 years. I parsed all of the data for 990 and 1105 and stopped trying to bridge the differences when I saw there were numerous changes to the stellar data. Having read further I think stellar data was an update to the T5 rules, with minimal effect on the history
Looking at Crucis Margin, there are exponential swings in population that would drastically change the balance of power. The Old Worlds 990 Population 121.169 BN vis-à-vis* 1105 Population 3.762 BN.
Were different rules applied to different sectors for the 1105 update? Is the 990 data considered to be flawed, incorrect or incomplete in Crucis Margin, but more ~ correct in Glimmerdrift closer to the Imperium?
Or is there an explanation of the loss of Billions of sophonts between 990 and 1105 in Crucis Margin?
I’m just trying to get guidance on the “official” retcon so that perhaps my own retcon won’t be so far off the future baseline.
Further Examples:
The Raidermarch and New Sun Subsectors have a population of
238.261 BN in QLI 990 and
9.264 BN in OTU 1105.
Apologies for the change in data format, I gave up on 990 UWPs and the formats evolved as the analysis changed.
Travellermap 1105 data
World Name | SubSector | Hex | UWP | UWP Code | Bas | Zn | PBG | Worlds | Ally | Habitants | Imp | Econx | Cultx | Delta
(Millions)
v. 990 |
Serir | E: Raidermarch | 817 | D649799-7 | Pi | - | - | 710 | 10 | NaHu | 70,000,000 | { -2 } | (966-1) | [8568] | (69,930) |
Achmetha | F: NewSun | 1215 | B426778-A | Pi | - | - | 704 | 11 | NaHu | 70,000,000 | { 2 } | (D6B+2) | [795A] | (59,930) |
Masan | F: NewSun | 1220 | D6558A5-6 | Ga Pa Ph | - | - | 413 | 13 | NaHu | 400,000,000 | { -2 } | (A75-4) | [6634] | (3,600) |
Gdynia | F: NewSun | 1616 | A5238B8-C | Na Po Ph Pi Pz | K | A | 800 | 6 | OlWo | 800,000,000 | { 2 } | (A7C+2) | [8A5C] | (59,200) |
Wroclaw | F: NewSun | 1620 | B6A58C8-B | Fl Ph Pz | - | A | 204 | 16 | OlWo | 200,000,000 | { 2 } | (E7C+2) | [8A5B] | (39,800) |
| | | | | | | | | | 1,540,000,000 | | | | |
Travellermap 990 data
Hex | Sub Sector | Name | UWP | Remarks | {Ix} | (Ex) RLI^E | [Cx] | N | B | Z | PBG | W | A | Inhabitants |
817 | Raidermarch | Serir | D649A99-6 | Hi In | 1 | A97 -4 | 9B6A | - | - | - | 710 | 0 | Na | 70,000,000,000 |
1215 | NewSun | Achmetha | B326A78-C | Hi In | 5 | C9C -2 | FF79 | - | - | - | 604 | 0 | Na | 60,000,000,000 |
1220 | NewSun | Masan | E6559A5-8 | Hi | 0 | 98C +2 | 6987 | - | - | - | 413 | 0 | Na | 4,000,000,000 |
1616 | NewSun | Gdynia | A523AB8-E | Hi In Na | 6 | 69C +5 | 9G6D | - | N | - | 600 | 0 | Ow | 60,000,000,000 |
1620 | NewSun | Wroclaw | B6A5AC8-C | Fl Hi | 4 | B9C +2 | 8E8G | - | - | - | 404 | 0 | Ow | 40,000,000,000 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | 234,000,000,000 |
I have the data from the travellermap parsed, I can run a comparison or an analysis for you if that would be useful to your work on these sectors. I do not have AOTI parsed, relying on the travellermap. As I said, I gave up on 990 data when there appeared to be no correlation to 1105 data, and decided to retro modify the 1105 data.
Thank you for your work on this, I like the way you build on what’s there.
[SPOILER="vis-à-vis"] French for face-to-face, an expression my college advisor and mentor used frequently. Coincidentally his name is Mark Miller.[/SPOILER]