• Welcome to the new COTI server. We've moved the Citizens to a new server. Please let us know in the COTI Website issue forum if you find any problems.
  • We, the systems administration staff, apologize for this unexpected outage of the boards. We have resolved the root cause of the problem and there should be no further disruptions.

T 5 Has arrived!!!!

Not forcing anything on anyone,

Thank you.

On second thought...

wait for the freakin release already!

...that kinda sounds like yelling.

And if you don't like it, leave...

It is a free forum, after all.
Let me get this straight...

You object to me choosing not to join the playtest forum. Instead, you ask me to join the playtest forum so that I may then choose to leave the playtest forum.

That doesn't make any sense.

Why don't I skip both you and the forum, and ask Don directly.

Don, what gives?
 
Well, See if this helps any

OK, no spoiler details from me and I have not received my preliminary copy yet but I have seen the 'play test' docs.

I loved Traveller (Classic) because you could do anything. For those of us with over active imaginations, it was the sky was the limit.
Then we had questions about various things, mainly we wanted details, details and more details. Well, along came other versions and they gave us details.
Some of us swear by CT or MgT or T4 or TNE because of these details.

So, now for T5.
My take over reading T5 rules, is the sky is the limit for what you want to do.
There are more suggestions for making the OTU and game play work for you.
There are more what ifs that IF the GM wants to they can add, ignore or change AND none are required to play.
There are several detailed game mechanics if you are a gearhead, world builder, Empire builder, character builder or just a very active player.
But all the above can be done quickly and with out lots of detail if you wish.
I would not say that T5 is complexly flexible (I can think of a few games that are that generic) but it is open enough to allow a GM to create what they want and need.

Why buy T5 over Mgt? I can not answer that. That is a personal choice on what you want to spend.
Why buy T5 at all? See above, but I would strongly suggest that anyone who would like an open, yet defined universe look at it.

How can it be open and defined. Because outside a few things that are Traveller (R) OTU the sky is the limit. OTU characteristics are 1 Week Jump time, character generation (one of the first of its kind), real world science in the forumlas (which you can ignore if you want) and Huge section of the galaxy defined and layout, but what is just beyond all those is totally open.

Dave Chase
 
Or my respsonse to this question, why should I preorder T5

(and I am answering another question about why should I buy T5 since I have MgT)

I do understand the concern about spending money for a product that will come out say 1 or 2 years later. Seems like a waste to most.
But, I my self have been looking forward to an 'updated' Traveller. Mgt has done a nice job of getting the excitement back into the Traveller (R) game. Thanks Mongoose.

But here is also how I consider it for spending $35 on a product in production.
I like Marc's work and know that he can produce, so I consider it an investment in a product that I know I will get some day. Wish it was sooner than later, but getting it is the important thing to me.

Paying in advance has given me (and others) the chance to be involved with the development of the Traveller (T5) game. It is like being a playtester but you have to pay to have the priviledge. How is that different? Well, anyone can be a playtester if accepted by a company, here you are 'quaranteed' to be a playtester if you pay. And any playtester has NDA requirements placed on them. Just goes with the territory.

Personally, I just got involved with the project in the last few months. I have listened to others talk about being involved and thought about it over the last year. So, I saved up money here and there until I felt that I could drop it on a future product. I would have looked/bought T5 if it came out so why not buy it a head of time and be involved along the way.

As for not being able to talk about it, IMO, I think that the public interest part just got away from Marc and company. I don't think that they realized that there were so many people in the wings watching. With the hunderds of people that preordered, I personally think they did not realize that so many others would be that 'interested' in it (T5).

I know that Marc (and company) are discussing what they should allow to be talked about by others. I know that they are also discussing how much of peptalk/promotions should be given out to the public.

I have some other titbits that I am considering talking about why I like T5. Some are for the same reasons that a lot of you like MgT. There are also some reasons that don't exist (yet?) in MgT.

So, the question for most that are reading this is
I have bought MgT, so why should I buy T5?

My response (at this time) is, it is the updated Traveller version by the creator. MgT is a great updated to today's standards of a great game. Marc's T5 is updated by the original guy with new twists, details and sky's the limit concepts. MgT borrowed/used some of these ideas in their updated version which I was very please to see that Marc and Mongoose worked together to do so.

So, IMO, I think that if you like MgT's new updated format and details, you will also like T5's new and updated concept of the Traveller game.

Once difference also to consider,
Mongoose is planning on releasing lots of Traveller related or updated Traveller material. Marc is planning (from what I can figure) to keep working on the mechanics, universe and concept of Traveller. So, I believe that both versions of Traveller (R) will work together. Marc's T5 will just have a few (or many) more options for the GM to work with, IMO.

Thank you for your time

Dave Chase
 
Wow, what a pickle...

The fundemental problem I see happening here is that we have TWO forums about T5, one public and one private, with many members with access to both which is utterly incompatible with being asked to keep the CD contents confidential. Either something is for public comsumption or it is not - it cannot exist in both states; yet that is exactly the position we're all caught in. Though not by design nor malicious intent, T5 is meant to be like Schroedinger's Cat BEFORE the box is opened - namely somehow both alive and dead. I for one cannot image how this can be resolved and humbly submit that no one can - it is inherently impossible. So, what we are left is that we must muddle through this as best we can and respect Marc and Don's wishes to best of our ability. I know this is not very satisfying and know that I NOT a big fan of awkward situations, but what can be done?

And that's just the situation here on COTI. Factor in what's going on with the Mongoose website and it become really impossible. If MGT didn't exist, part of this bind would've been eased. Of course, that leads me to puzzle over the wisdom of granting Mongoose the Traveller license when T5 was in the offing. Isn't that essentially creating your own competitor? And a competitor that has beaten you to the market no less. Ouch.

No matter to me, I will happily place both MGT and T5 next to my copies of CT, MT, TNE, T4, GT and T20 (and in fact have already done so with MGT) because for me it's about "all things Traveller".

But still... what a pickle we're in! Sheesh.
 
LJ, you're right on the muddle, except at the end of the day it really isn't that big of a deal.

I mean, T5 really is just for a couple hundred crazy people like us ourselves, so it's not as if a potential blockbuster is being hamstrung by bad timing or strategy. There are precious few people who will buy a 1000-page PDF in 2008. It's simply that once the thing is out, in whatever form, people tend to want to, you know, talk about it.
 
Well, I've been trying to monitor all three sites, and make some progress on the assigned task Marc left me...

Basically, no one who paid for the CD has signed an NDA -- but Marc has publicly requested that they not make any public comments for now.

Marc's basic plan was:

1. ship the CDs.
2. spend time with the grandkids.

He's doing #2 right now, and so as much as I'd like a little more wiggle room, I'm NOT going to post stuff without his approval.

And I'm very thrilled that the forum members and T5 pre-order owners have (so far) honored Marc's request.
 
Well, I've been trying to monitor all three sites, and make some progress on the assigned task Marc left me...

Basically, no one who paid for the CD has signed an NDA -- but Marc has publicly requested that they not make any public comments for now.

Marc's basic plan was:

1. ship the CDs.
2. spend time with the grandkids.

He's doing #2 right now, and so as much as I'd like a little more wiggle room, I'm NOT going to post stuff without his approval.

And I'm very thrilled that the forum members and T5 pre-order owners have (so far) honored Marc's request.

So, I won't ask you to be patient -- but you will have to wait.
 
Kind of awesome really
you guys did good:.)

Really excited to think that T5 is winging its way across the Atlantic
I am sooo looking forward to reading it

especially the "Absent Friends" bit, I just think it's very nice that
Marc is giving time to talk about all those great folks that were involved
way back when and are no longer here

Alan Hume
 
I can't say I'm that knowledgeable of the RPG industry, but watching the development of T5 is like watching the Keystone Cops. I can't imagine anything more amateur.

T5 in development for years.
Various invited playtesters leave disgruntled because Marc refuses to listen to their comments.
T5 announced year on year as being imminent, but never gets published.
T5 announced as being sold as a beta CD-ROM so that others can do Marc's work in getting it into shape so it can be sold again as a book. (Marc wins award for most innovative business model for 2007).
T5 CD-ROM announced as ready for release. (Much fanfare and releasing of pigeons).
T5 not quite ready for release, but gets delayed just a bit longer, honest, just a few months.
Hold on a minute, actually T5 is so far away from release that the alpha version needs to be sold to people who then do Marc's work in getting it into shape as a beta.
A year latter, T5 beta is now ready for sale.
Hang on a minute, it's still a beta (in fact some even speak of it as still an alpha), so those who have purchased it are asked not to speak about it.
In total, an alpha that has been worked on by paying customers is released as a beta that's intended to be worked on yet more by paying customers so that some time later a book can be published and sold again. But in the meantime, no-one can talk about it. (Marc wins most innovative business model for 2008).
And as icing on the cake, the announcement of T5 on the FEE web page has a typo.

I know, I know, I know, I don't have to buy T5. True, I'm not going to touch it with a barge pole. And I know others are entitled to throw their money and their time where they want to. I'm just commenting on the farcical and amateur way the whole thing has/is being handled.
 
I can't say I'm that knowledgeable of the RPG industry, but watching the development of T5 is like watching the Keystone Cops. I can't imagine anything more amateur.

I can. It's watching people who have never tried to design anything in the industry accuse the man behind Traveller of some wild stuff (down to plagarism).

T5 in development for years.

Can't disagree there at all. Marc and I first discussed T5 in 1997.

Various invited playtesters leave disgruntled because Marc refuses to listen to their comments.

If this is in regards to the first "playtest", the old archives on the web I've seen tell a somewhat different tale. Admittedly, one side has taken its case to the internet, and attacked Marc every chance. And Marc's side has not said anything at all -- so most folks have only one side to go on. What I have seen is that while Rob tried to get things refocused on the old forum during that playtest, others took their case off those forums to every other Traveller site possible. Marc then gave them the heave because by giving Rob so much grief, what was the point? So their multi-pronged attack became a self-fulfilling prophecy, and they have their personal reputations invested in that. I'm not sure what it's like to live in that kind of a world, where everything is a grand conspiracy against you, but I wouldn't want to be there.

T5 announced year on year as being imminent, but never gets published.

Hmm... can't disagree there either. It's why I made Marc promise never to mention another date.

T5 announced as being sold as a beta CD-ROM so that others can do Marc's work in getting it into shape so it can be sold again as a book. (Marc wins award for most innovative business model for 2007).

Wow... that's the most one-sided piece of garbage ever. And I know -- because I deliberately setup the alpha to insure this accusation would not stick.

You see, behind those closed doors, we let people toss issues at Marc, but I was insistent that mechanic solutions NOT be passed. I wanted every solution, every added detail, to come from Marc.

If someone involved in the T5 Development Forum really believes your statement, I'd like them to say so. Until one of them does, this accusation is completely bogus.

T5 CD-ROM announced as ready for release. (Much fanfare and releasing of pigeons).

See above, with the dates.

T5 not quite ready for release, but gets delayed just a bit longer, honest, just a few months.

Wow, you're doubling up. I'd agree with you again, but I really only think you should list that once.

Hold on a minute, actually T5 is so far away from release that the alpha version needs to be sold to people who then do Marc's work in getting it into shape as a beta.

Marc changed things late last year. And until we opened the forums in April, no one was looking at T5 but the Circle. And the rest of this is the "people do Marc's work for him" garbage I addressed above, and that's just garbage. Again, if someone active on the T5 development forum wants to make this accusation, I'm ready to hear it -- but I don't think they can. And anyone else doesn't know anything about the process, so their claims are not relevant.

A year later, T5 beta is now ready for sale.

Actually, it's been for sale for a while. And I fixed your spelling. It just was shipped.

Hang on a minute, it's still a beta (in fact some even speak of it as still an alpha), so those who have purchased it are asked not to speak about it.

Again, here's where folks not in the development forum won't understand. Alpha to me means there's no playable game. Beta, that's playable. We're definitely at beta. Anyone who's got the CD and says alpha, contact me and let me know how you define alpha and beta releases. And as far as not speaking about it, Marc doesn't want us to lose our focus by having to respond to outside discussions -- we really could stop making any progress at all -- and there are many who would love to see that happen. Go above where I talked about the many who are invested in seeing T5 fail. And it's gotten pretty obvious with this post that you must be one of those. I just don't get that mindset.

In total, an alpha that has been worked on by paying customers is released as a beta that's intended to be worked on yet more by paying customers so that some time later a book can be published and sold again. But in the meantime, no-one can talk about it. (Marc wins most innovative business model for 2008).

I've already ripped this apart. It's a great accusation until you're dealing with anyone who participated in the T5 development forums.

And as icing on the cake, the announcement of T5 on the FEE web page has a typo.

And you had a typo I fixed in your post. And perhaps you should look at the FFE page, instead of that one you paid for. Two typos now.

I know, I know, I know, I don't have to buy T5. True, I'm not going to touch it with a barge pole. And I know others are entitled to throw their money and their time where they want to. I'm just commenting on the farcical and amateur way the whole thing has/is being handled.

And I'm responding on the sad way Marc and T5 are being attacked. It's amazing how many people NEED T5 to fail to vindicate their worldview. That just amazes me. You don't have to search very far with Google to find Marc being called the meanest things over T5. Did it hurt you guys that much to wake up one morning and see someone happy that they have the T5 preliminary edition CD?

And because Marc's asked them not to talk about it, and because they are actually honoring that request even though there's nothing he could do if they did, and they haven't signed NDAs -- they really own those CDs, you guys have nothing you can attack. So it's trot out the same old time-worn garbage?

The real fact is that T5 made it to CD without you (meaning "you" as a group, not personal). And that hurts. It hurts you, it hurts those who have turned hating Marc into a personal hobby. In truth -- you guys put yourselves on the sidelines. Any single one of you guys could have, at any point, stepped up and gotten involved. But you took the idea that Marc might have a vision of a game that was different from yours as an insult, and you let your animosity about that disagreement turn love of a game into hatred of its owner and designer.

So you will never buy T5. So you will never buy another book with Marc's name on the cover. Marc moved on, and you didn't. And over 650 others believed enough in Marc to put money down on it. Around 400 of them got access to the forums. A small portion of that 400 was very active in reviewing the drafts and raising issues. Hopefully more of them will get active as we continue development. Marc and T5 have moved on, and those who wanted to see him fail have not.

The delays, the dates, the bad drafts, the wild accusations -- I'm very sure we haven't seen the last of this stuff posted. If you have to do that to feel relevant, have fun. It's Christmastime, the T5 prelim CD has shipped, and nothing Marc, Rob or I, or any of the circle members, or the forum members, or the T5 purchasers will post will change your minds about it. Because you were invested in a failure that didn't happen.

I just don't understand that mindset at all.
 
Last edited:
Stainless, you forgot my April Fool's Joke that T5 was released on April Fool's Day.

:rofl:

By the way, DonM, I'll be buying the prelliminary T5 as soon as I get some extra money after the holidays. Beta or not, Congrats on the release!
 
I will stand corrected about the NDA comment I made elsewhere; so this just a voluntary thing of not telling? Ok...I still don' get it but if it's voluntary, that's cool.

Myself, I have gone from not caring about T5 to wishing I could get a copy to see what its all about...but I don't preorder anything, ever. Just my personal policy.

If I sent Marc the $35 would I still get a CD, minus all the goodies you got for pre-paying?

Allen
 
Various invited playtesters leave disgruntled because Marc refuses to listen to their comments.

Common misconception. Many feel that if their suggestions are not implemented or how they think things should be done are, Marc isn't listening. What they fail to realize is that they aren't there to help design the game. They are their to help refine what has been written.

T5 announced as being sold as a beta CD-ROM so that others can do Marc's work in getting it into shape so it can be sold again as a book. (Marc wins award for most innovative business model for 2007).

and

Hold on a minute, actually T5 is so far away from release that the alpha version needs to be sold to people who then do Marc's work in getting it into shape as a beta.

Doing Marc's work? What, spotting typos and mechanics issues? You do know what playtesting is for right?

Hang on a minute, it's still a beta (in fact some even speak of it as still an alpha), so those who have purchased it are asked not to speak about it.

For the moment. He'd prefer it get out to the people that order it first. Why is this an issue for you?

As for beta, so is practically every 1st edition ever released. Marc's just being honest about the fact and not forcing anyone to buy a printed book that is rife with problems.

In total, an alpha that has been worked on by paying customers is released as a beta that's intended to be worked on yet more by paying customers so that some time later a book can be published and sold again. But in the meantime, no-one can talk about it. (Marc wins most innovative business model for 2008).

Again, what is this work that the customers are doing that Marc should be?

And as icing on the cake, the announcement of T5 on the FEE web page has a typo.

Oh my. Have you bothered to email him and let him know?
 
Common misconception. Many feel that if their suggestions are not implemented or how they think things should be done are, Marc isn't listening. What they fail to realize is that they aren't there to help design the game. They are their to help refine what has been written.

As one who was there I'd say it was "some" not "many", and some of us were more upset at the fact that simple questions on how to proceed and exactly what was wanted weren't answered. It was not a playtest, I'm not sure exactly what it was, more of a sounding board maybe for Marc to throw out ideas for reaction. He got that, much of it negative, but usually with good reasoning and suggestions. What else could he expect from what was given without instruction when it was clearly not playtest material? A little interaction and direction early on in that could have avoid a lot if not all the grief that came out of it. But, water under the bridge and all...

...spotting typos and mechanics issues? You do know what playtesting is for right?

Even what little I saw of round two of T5 "playtesting" didn't look much like this. In fact I seem to recall Marc specifically saying at one point (or was that in the first run?) that he was not interested in typo fixing.

If this is the state of the current (round 3?) CD pre-order playtest (and what I've heard seems to support that) then it's good. Progress is being made and that pleases me. Especially the reports of some 600 involved (even if that stretches credulity, pre-orders sure, even signed on the secret board, but active playtesters... )
 
Don't expect to get mine til the New Year,which is good because it means less
chance of it getting lost in the Christmas post (Like my WW2 fighter planes:.(
 
Back
Top