• Welcome to the new COTI server. We've moved the Citizens to a new server. Please let us know in the COTI Website issue forum if you find any problems.
  • We, the systems administration staff, apologize for this unexpected outage of the boards. We have resolved the root cause of the problem and there should be no further disruptions.

Modifying surplus ships.

The questions you keep trying to deflect with are easily answered, and irrelevant to installing fuel purification plants.
No, the questions, and your answers, were deliberate and on point. They clearly illustrates why the discussion goes nowhere: We are not talking about the same thing, the same rules.

You are, as far as I can tell, talking about the rules you play by, that can change by example.
I talk about the rules written in the books, that can't change (except by explicit errata of the rule itself).

Hence, the discussion is moot.
 
No, the questions, were deliberate atempts by you to change the subject, and not stay on point. They clearly illustrate why the discussion goes nowhere—You cannot answer the basic question. What prohibits you from installing a fuel purification plant?

You are, as far as I can tell, deliberately avoiding answering the question. Because you can't. Because the rules do not prohibit it.

And instead of admitting that, you deliberately an maliciously ignore the question, bring up other issues, and use mendacious language, such as calling the writers of the game "super referees".

They are not "super referees, they are the people who wrote the rules. They write compilations of data derived from Traveller rules, and they write the errata. Calling them "super referees" instead of the writes of the game can only be an attempt to keep from admitting there are no rules prohibiting installing fuel purifiers in book 2 ships.


For all your talk of rules written in books you can't cite a single rule prohibiting it. Hence, the discussion is moot.
No, the questions, and your answers, were deliberate and on point. They clearly illustrates why the discussion goes nowhere: We are not talking about the same thing, the same rules.

You are, as far as I can tell, talking about the rules you play by, that can change by example.
I talk about the rules written in the books, that can't change (except by explicit errata of the rule itself).

Hence, the discussion is moot.
 
No, the questions, were deliberate atempts by you to change the subject, and not stay on point.
NO. Don't presume to say what I meant.

This clearly shows what I mean:
The question that you studiously ignore is if your logic applies to the XBoat, the Gazelle and the Annic Nova:
...
It is RAW to carry less than 4 weeks of power plant fuel?
It is acceptable to carry less than 4 week fuel—X-boats.

RAW is, as it always was:
LBB2'81, p15:
Skärmavbild 2025-09-14 kl. 10.12.19.png
It has not been changed, no errata has been issued.

A RAW LBB2 ship has 10Pn fuel tankage, or else it is house-ruled. Nothing wrong with that, of course, it's just not RAW.



They clearly illustrate why the discussion goes nowhere—You cannot answer the basic question.
I have, multiple times.

What prohibits you from installing a fuel purification plant?
E.g.:
LBB2 has no system or rules for ornithopters, collectors, nor fuel processing plants.
If it has any of these components, it's no longer a plain LBB2 ship.

You build those ships by waving the magic wand of Rule 0.

If you install a component from different design system, it's not a RAW LBB2 ship, it's house-ruled.
If you install a component in the engineering section, where by RAW it can't be, it's not a RAW LBB2 ship, it's house-ruled.
Nothing wrong with that, of course, it's just not RAW.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top