As I have not much idea about engines and poswer plants, wouldn't fuell cells make sense where fusion plants are not efficient (as small vehicles)? Traveller seems to point they are, but I don't know in real life...
In the real world, for terrestrial applications, the most descriptive term would be Fool Cells.
The reason for this isn't the cells themselves (those are relatively straightforward tech) ... the problem is the hydrogen (and the storage thereof).
In this case, I'll simply get out of the way and let the pictures do the work of thousands of words.
The problem with hydrogen (as a power source) is that it doesn't appear as "something that can be mined" in pockets of H
2 gas "conveniently lying around, ready to be pumped" from any natural sources. Hydrogen almost ALWAYS appears in molecular form bound to other elements (H
2O, CH
4, NH
3, etc. etc. etc. etc. etc.), meaning that in order to "get at" the H
2 you have to "crack" the molecules you're wanting to source it from ... which means energy input
just to make the hydrogen you want to use.
Then there's the Storage Problem™.
Hydrogen is the smallest "stuff" in the universe ... meaning is can permeate through ALMOST EVERYTHING made of other elements/molecules ... so it "leaks" out of storage REALLY EASILY.
Worse, hydrogen will react with almost all containment materials, with metals being prone to a phenomenon known as
Hydrogen Embrittlement ... which does not bode well for sustainability/longevity of containment systems (that need to be pressurized, go figure). When the molecules of your "container" are being "attacked" at the atomic level ... options are ...
limited ...
The problem is that a system that relies on hydrogen as an "energy storage medium" for energy transfer (short of fusion) is going to be inherently lossy and wasteful, whether you're talking combustion or electrolysis (fuel cell). You're simply better off "leaving" the electricity AS ELECTRICITY and storing it as electricity in batteries (electrochemical) and/or capacitors (electrostatic) and then using the electricity directly.
Fusion, of course, upends the table on all of that ... making hydrogen the "go to" fuel for power generation.
Once fusion becomes commonplace (TL=9+) and the hydrogen containment technologies get "perfected" (so your hydrogen fuel tanks don't "leak" constantly in self-destruct mode fashion), fuel cells can start to make a comeback for low power applications ... but even then, you're often times going to be better off (in endurance/kg and/or endurance/liter terms) just by using Batteries/Capacitors instead.
Unfortunately,
Traveller of the 1970s/80s was decidedly biased against battery tech power density+pricing, so if you use CT Striker and/or LBB8 for this judgement of comparison, you'll be getting a wildly lopsided result in favor of fuel cells almost every single time. To be fair, it's only in the last 5-10 years that significant resources have been poured into battery research in the real world, lowering prices for batteries down to around Cr10 per kWh ... and in the next few years could go as low as Cr2 per kWh with some technologies currently being researched and developed for mass production.
"Predictions are hard, especially about the future."
And if all of that isn't convincing enough ... try
This REALITY™ on for size ...