lightsenshi
SOC-12
Call me evil, but my current campaign has the PCs in a jump 6 armored courier.  A 250 ton armored courier.  With a smart @$$ computer that cheats at cards.   
		
		
	
	
		 
	   
		 
	   
		 
	
				
			 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	What system are you using to get a good jump 6 ship?Originally posted by lightsenshi:
Call me evil, but my current campaign has the PCs in a jump 6 armored courier. A 250 ton armored courier. With a smart @$$ computer that cheats at cards.


What system are you using to get a good jump 6 ship?Originally posted by George Boyett:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by lightsenshi:
Call me evil, but my current campaign has the PCs in a jump 6 armored courier. A 250 ton armored courier. With a smart @$$ computer that cheats at cards.


 
 
What system are you using to get a good jump 6 ship?Originally posted by lightsenshi:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by George Boyett:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by lightsenshi:
Call me evil, but my current campaign has the PCs in a jump 6 armored courier. A 250 ton armored courier. With a smart @$$ computer that cheats at cards.


 
   </font>[/QUOTE]Ah that tight huh?
 </font>[/QUOTE]Ah that tight huh?   
  Yes, I'll get around to posting it someday soon.Originally posted by George Boyett:
Ah that tight huh?
 
	I've looked through my copy of Behind the Claw & couldn't find this ship.Where is it in the book?Originally posted by Jame:
, are a 300dt "General Purpose" ship in SJG's _Behind the Claw_, .
-----------------------------------------------Originally posted by Jame:
The 300dton ship mentioned in GT:BTC is in the Tremous Dex entry on page 64. There are no statistics, just a brief write-up.

Oh,ok. I thought I was going crazy or something.Well give me a reason to go through & reread it.Originally posted by Jame:
Warriorknight, all I can tell you is "it's in the subsector descriptions." I can't tell you more without looking it up, and I can't look it up right now. A page reference is in the works, but not yet (and come to think of it, there were no stats for it, just a sentence describing it).

