Commander Truestar
SOC-13
A few things to think about.
One: Per T5.10 BBB 3, page 90, a Thin surface atmosphere extends from whatever mean ground level is up to 500 meters, so 1600 feet or so. It should be noted that the same page has a Standard Atmosphere extending up to only 1000 meters, so that Denver would be a Thin atmosphere city by T5.10. Personally, I would go with 2000 meters for Standard to change to Thin, but that is what the rules say. So no need for pressurized living quarters unless at higher elevations.
That's a good point I had not considered!
Checking a chart, Cusco, Peru is at 11,152ft (3399 m)
When I visited there in 2018, I did not realize it but I was ignoring a health issue I had. We "thought" it had been a failure to adjust to the altitude, but it turned out I had double pneumonia! We didn't find that out until I returned to the US a week later. (We think I contracted pneumonia in Ecuador the week before)
But, given that, my wife had no issues breathing and I was able to be active so long as I stopped and took breaks to catch my breathing up. We also had the "space balls" experience of stopping at shops to buy me "canned oxygen"...hehehe
That said, at sea level, the pneumonia did not seem to affect me except during extreme exercise. But it did have more of an effect in Cusco, Peru. Judging by those real-world events, I could even suggest "Thin" would be comparative to altitude: 10,000 ft+
That said, "sealed" structures would not be needed until 15,000 ft+ based on that experience.
Second: Just about all of the water is going to be in a BIG ice cap on the Dark Side of the planet. Any water which comes from the habitable zone into the Sun Side is not going to stay.
I absolutely agree with that.
My current mental map of the world shows the following:
1) A massive ice-shield broken by up-thrust geologic structures(mountains and "surface plates") covering the dark side of the world
2) Where the ice shield reaches around towards the habitable zone, it melts into elongated "seas" which are connected to each other by thready rivers. Water from those seas would then flow into and across the habitable zone. Those rivers would either pool in lakes(large or small) or flow into the ever increasing heat of the bright side.
3) Not far outside of the habitable zone, rivers that reach that far will fade into alluvial fans where the water evaporates away completely.
The air coming from the habitable zone is going to be cooler than the air on the Sun Side, and therefore is going to warm up, and pick up more humidity along with the warming, so you are going to have desert conditions very quickly on the Sun Side. Think Southern California. For any agriculture on the Sun Side, you are going to have to pipe massive quantities in from the Dark Side, after first melting it.
My mental view of this is based on experiences in Iceland in 1998, when we went to see eruptions from a vent under the Vatnajokull ice sheet. If you don't like the weather in Iceland, wait five minutes....literally. The Gulf stream meets arctic currents meet right over Iceland and the weather can change 10+ times in under an hour! During a walk outside Reykjavík, we experienced three separate rain storms and two snow storms between periods of "clear skies"
To the south, there are huge volcanic wastes and other spaces which were water-starved despite their proximity to the Atlantic ocean. I am also considering some environmental "shifts" based on situations like Chili's "Atacama Desert", which is water-starved because of the location's proximity to the Andes mountains along with its position in the Earth's wind currents.
As you said, cooler surface winds would be ripping from the cold side to the hot, but those steadier winds will be countered by higher altitude hot air currents. I expect there will be lots of friction and volatility in the interphase layers, and there will be "sudden domes" of hot air pushing out of the bright side too.
Third: The planet's circumference is going to be at least 12,500 miles, with a habitable zone of uncertain width. If it is say, an average of 100 miles wide, that gives an inhabitable surface area of 1,250,000 square miles, of about 1/3 of the United States. I suspect that some of the area can be used for agricultural purposes, and the planet will likely be able to feed itself depending on the topography. You will not have any seasons, and those areas with direct daylight will have it continuously, which does drastically increase the growth rate.
Agreed.
This also supports my suggestion that conditions on the world edge towards "overpopulated" where the world is settled. Not like "Dr. Dredd" urban blocks, but the less you have, the less space you have to fit into...
Thank you for making me think of things, and in directions, I had not considered!