Space Grain Train
I did some rough math on an idea I had for this... if we have consistent grain crops on world A and consistent customers on world X, and a super-tech preservative (stasis?), we could take a very long term view.
We could avoid the use of Jump drives and go with "Not as fast as light" drives for hauling cargo. The NAFAL example in the T5 BBB shows a 0.2G NAFAL drive. I wanted to understand how long it would take to get the quadrotriticale from A to X with NAFAL. Let's say they are Jump 2, 3.26*2ly away.
51 weeks of acceleration
30844800 seconds in 51 weeks
0.2 fraction of G from the NAFAL example
9.8 m/s/s value of G
1.96 m/s/s computed acceleration
60455808 m/s, from v=at , velocity after 51 weeks of constant acceleration
60455.808 k/s conversion to kilometers/second
299792 k/s ( c) value of speed of light
0.201659177 %c attained after 51 weeks
3.26 parsecs per light year
2 parsecs distance
6.52 ly
32.3317792726 years to move the grain
51 weeks to speed up (nearly a year)
51 weeks to slow down (again nearly a year)
31.something years to deliver grain, counting some of the time under drive power to reduce the total 32.3 years at max velocity.
So, with my tongue firmly in my cheek, it is possible to get 31 year old grain (something less than 520 tons of grain (i.e. 240 dTons for fuel in and outbound for a 1000 dTon ship = total 480 tons of fuel , 1000-480 = 520 tons for other things and cargo) on a space grain train... maybe they launch a ship 6 times a year and hope for arrival. They'd need 186 ships to keep the train going, and twice that for the returns, and maybe a few more for spares.
For an empire that exists 1100+ years, who cares about 31 years?:file_21:
PS I'll finish out the NAFAL cargo ship and then build an equivalent-tonnage jump drive ship and play the efficiency game if requested. I can't tell from just the fuel displacement if the NAFAL or jump drive ship will win, so I left this as a sort of a farce.
I did some rough math on an idea I had for this... if we have consistent grain crops on world A and consistent customers on world X, and a super-tech preservative (stasis?), we could take a very long term view.
We could avoid the use of Jump drives and go with "Not as fast as light" drives for hauling cargo. The NAFAL example in the T5 BBB shows a 0.2G NAFAL drive. I wanted to understand how long it would take to get the quadrotriticale from A to X with NAFAL. Let's say they are Jump 2, 3.26*2ly away.
51 weeks of acceleration
30844800 seconds in 51 weeks
0.2 fraction of G from the NAFAL example
9.8 m/s/s value of G
1.96 m/s/s computed acceleration
60455808 m/s, from v=at , velocity after 51 weeks of constant acceleration
60455.808 k/s conversion to kilometers/second
299792 k/s ( c) value of speed of light
0.201659177 %c attained after 51 weeks
3.26 parsecs per light year
2 parsecs distance
6.52 ly
32.3317792726 years to move the grain
51 weeks to speed up (nearly a year)
51 weeks to slow down (again nearly a year)
31.something years to deliver grain, counting some of the time under drive power to reduce the total 32.3 years at max velocity.
So, with my tongue firmly in my cheek, it is possible to get 31 year old grain (something less than 520 tons of grain (i.e. 240 dTons for fuel in and outbound for a 1000 dTon ship = total 480 tons of fuel , 1000-480 = 520 tons for other things and cargo) on a space grain train... maybe they launch a ship 6 times a year and hope for arrival. They'd need 186 ships to keep the train going, and twice that for the returns, and maybe a few more for spares.
For an empire that exists 1100+ years, who cares about 31 years?:file_21:
PS I'll finish out the NAFAL cargo ship and then build an equivalent-tonnage jump drive ship and play the efficiency game if requested. I can't tell from just the fuel displacement if the NAFAL or jump drive ship will win, so I left this as a sort of a farce.
Last edited: