• Welcome to the new COTI server. We've moved the Citizens to a new server. Please let us know in the COTI Website issue forum if you find any problems.
  • We, the systems administration staff, apologize for this unexpected outage of the boards. We have resolved the root cause of the problem and there should be no further disruptions.

Why I don't overly worry about system generation

What is the jump limit for a black hole? A black hole doesn't have a radius, it only has a mass, it is a point mass in space with a certain radius calledthe event horizon, but that is arbitrary, it isn't a physical surface.

Not quite, the event horizon is the boundary between out universe and the strange physics that goes on inside. Also black holes have several other properties beside mass.

A black hole event horizon is therefore a radius of sorts, it is the boundary past which nothing can escape. Personally I would use the ergosphere as the radius of the black hole for jump calculation purposes.

I may be wrong, but for something falling into the black hole, apart from tidal forces (spaghettification), doesn't theory say there is no way to tell where the event horizon is? Since, as I understand it, your velocity and acceleration affect the spacetime view according to relativity. So the horizon is, in one sense, at a specific point (or actually surface), but it's not like there are signposts to tell you that you are crossing into the weird space.
 
Why I don't overly worry about system generation

I do not overly worry about it, as if I do not like it, I simply change it to something that I do like. If working in SectorMaker, it is simply a matter of a few clicks, and voila, a brand new main planet for the system.
 
Nice!

I find scientists who understand the limits of science to be a lot more bearable than those who think they have things all figured out.

I often find that the scientists have some sense of the limits of science, where many others have almost no idea--whether they think science can do almost anything, or science can do very little.
 
and "hot Neptunes" https://phys.org/news/2020-10-atmosphere-hot-neptune-years-shouldnt.html

"For the first time, we measured the light coming from this planet that shouldn't exist," said Ian Crossfield, assistant professor of physics & astronomy at KU and lead author of the paper. "This planet is so intensely irradiated by its star that its temperature is over 3,000 degrees Fahrenheit and its atmosphere could have evaporated entirely. Yet, our Spitzer observations show us its atmosphere via the infrared light the planet emits."
 
Wired article about our solar system and that it, so far, appears totally different than others. But we're still in the stone age really for viewing other systems. So things will keep on changing
 
another article as to why I'll just make up my systems as needed for the story

Forbes article

from the article:
4,100. That’s how many kilometers Quaoar’s rings are from the dwarf planet’s core. That puts its rings at a distance of roughly 7.4 of the dwarf planet’s radii from its core—twice as far as the maximum distance, called a “Roche limit,” astronomers previously thought possible for a ring system to survive. Saturn’s rings, by contrast, are within three of the gas giant’s radii.
 
Astrophysical Journal planet catalog so we can read about all the planets. And things that "shouldn't work".

"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy" applies to astronomy as well.

Summary article here (Gizmodo)
 
because we keep finding new things that should not happen by current models. So I just use one that I like and that's good enough for fun & games.

https://www.sciencealert.com/new-ev...s-formed-too-fast-for-our-cosmological-models
I've always been about finding new reasons for systems being the way they are in the game and how to use that to generate scenarios. I love systems with really outlying values like insanely high law levels or absurd governments and the like.
 
Back
Top