A while back, like in the early 1990s, I attended a dinner meeting where the speaker basically spent roughly an hour explaining how U.S. companies could get around the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act in dealing with countries where bribery was a way of life. He did have one problem with one of his examples, where the company, which was a very large one, committed to build a hospital under a no-bid contract, where the government official involved had his family get the contracted, at a somewhat inflated price. Once the company was locked in on this, the official then awarded the contract to a non-US company. Needless to say, the U.S. company was a bit upset, and were even more upset when the official told them that the other company, not troubled by such a thing as a Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, had simply made a large deposit in a Swiss bank account that he had. The company was not in a position to do anything, as if they went after the government official in the home country, they would immediately implicate themselves in a Foreign Corrupt Practices action in this country.
The morale of the story is, make sure that when you bribe someone, he stays bribed.
Then there is the account of the Japanese naval attache to Chili who paid the Chilean Naval Minister $50,000 in gold to send a Chilean merchant ship to Japan loaded with nitrates, this after Pearl Harbor, and dare the U.S. Navy to sink the ship. Needless to say, no ship was sent, and the complaints of the Japanese naval attache in the intercept were quite pitiful. There was nothing he could do, as if he complained, the Naval Minister would accuse him of fabricating the story to discredit the Naval Minister, and order the attache home. The English author that I was working with on this and I thought that this was quite funny.
Morale of the story, is the guy bribed actually going to do what he was bribed to do?