• Welcome to the new COTI server. We've moved the Citizens to a new server. Please let us know in the COTI Website issue forum if you find any problems.
  • We, the systems administration staff, apologize for this unexpected outage of the boards. We have resolved the root cause of the problem and there should be no further disruptions.

Starports Error?

Icosahedron

SOC-14 1K
Hi,
I've been playing Traveller for nearly thirty years and I've just bought my first GT book - Starports.
I have a query. On page 58 is the Port Modifier Table. It produces a port modifier that increases as you go down the table - ie the port modifier increases as the UWTN decreases.
This creates a situation in which the port gets smaller as the world trade gets larger.
Is this an error, am I doing something wrong, or is there a rationale that explains this?

Why should an increase in trade reduce the size of a starport?

I discovered this when I was building a starport and decided to see what difference an increase of TL would make to the size and throughput of the port on my Pop 7 world, but I found that when I increased TL from 11 to 12, it also changed the WTN from 4.5 to 5 and because of the negative effect of the port modifier table, the TL gains were cancelled out! (4.5+0.5 became 5.0+0.0) Surely this is not right?
 
It's the miniaturisation. The goods get smaller as the tech level goes up, so you obviously don't need as much space.

<tongue firmly in cheek> :D
 
Maybe the port is bursting at the seams and thus bottlenecks trade? IIRC, the WTN scale is exponential, with a unit difference being an order of magnitude bigger or smaller.

Thus, half a unit (the 0.5 increment you talked about) would be a 10^0.5 ~= 3.2x increase in trade through the port, assuming no bottleneck.
 
At least there is no errata on the sjgames website. Maybe asking the question there (one of the authors of Starports is a regular reader/writer) would help
 
Thanks guys.
One of the Starports authors found my query here and sent me a PM.
GLM's bottleneck answer is on the right lines, it seems.
A class IV port helps to uplift a WTN 4.5 world, but has no effect (or at least, not tripling) on a WTN 5.0 world.
 
It's not a bottleneck issue per se either. It's mostly a resolution problem. A class IV port on a UWTN 5 world has more traffic than a class IV port on a UWTN 4.5 world, it just doesn't have quite enough extra traffic to qualify for a full +0.5 (i.e. WTN goes from 4.8 to 5.2 or some such).
 
Back
Top