MT Player's Manual free at DTRPG

[SanDragon]

In any case, they still print nicely. I bought the Referee's Manual and printed out the ship design tables (guess that makes me a gearhead) to redesign a ship at Tech-15. Apparently, If I'm reading my resources right, Darrian can't build it.

 

[SanDragon]

In any case, they still print nicely. I bought the Referee's Manual and printed out the ship design tables (guess that makes me a gearhead) to redesign a ship at Tech-15. Apparently, If I'm reading my resources right, Darrian can't build it.

 

[SanDragon]

In any case, they still print nicely. I bought the Referee's Manual and printed out the ship design tables (guess that makes me a gearhead) to redesign a ship at Tech-15. Apparently, If I'm reading my resources right, Darrian can't build it.

 

[vutpakdi]

I'm more concerned about the sloppy scanning with pages askew (T4's Naval Architect Manual).

Ron

 

[vutpakdi]

I'm more concerned about the sloppy scanning with pages askew (T4's Naval Architect Manual).

Ron

 

[vutpakdi]

I'm more concerned about the sloppy scanning with pages askew (T4's Naval Architect Manual).

Ron

 

[aramis]

I'm most annoyed by the out-of-sequence pages.

 

[aramis]

I'm most annoyed by the out-of-sequence pages.

 

[aramis]

I'm most annoyed by the out-of-sequence pages.

 

[hunter]

Originally posted by Ron Vutpakdi:
I'm more concerned about the sloppy scanning with pages askew (T4's Naval Architect Manual).

Ron

I've seen this a bit in the 2300 book but it is not too bad. Still quite usable. How bad is it in that one?

Hunter

 

[hunter]

Originally posted by Ron Vutpakdi:
I'm more concerned about the sloppy scanning with pages askew (T4's Naval Architect Manual).

Ron

I've seen this a bit in the 2300 book but it is not too bad. Still quite usable. How bad is it in that one?

Hunter

 

[hunter]

Originally posted by Ron Vutpakdi:
I'm more concerned about the sloppy scanning with pages askew (T4's Naval Architect Manual).

Ron

I've seen this a bit in the 2300 book but it is not too bad. Still quite usable. How bad is it in that one?

Hunter

 

[hunter]

Originally posted by Aramis:
I'm most annoyed by the out-of-sequence pages.

Contact DTRPG and let them know. They will fix the PDF and get a new version posted (and I imagine will allow you to download the corrected file).

Hunter

 

[hunter]

Originally posted by Aramis:
I'm most annoyed by the out-of-sequence pages.

Contact DTRPG and let them know. They will fix the PDF and get a new version posted (and I imagine will allow you to download the corrected file).

Hunter

 

[hunter]

Originally posted by Aramis:
I'm most annoyed by the out-of-sequence pages.

Contact DTRPG and let them know. They will fix the PDF and get a new version posted (and I imagine will allow you to download the corrected file).

Hunter

 

[vutpakdi]

Originally posted by hunter:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Ron Vutpakdi:
I'm more concerned about the sloppy scanning with pages askew (T4's Naval Architect Manual).

I've seen this a bit in the 2300 book but it is not too bad. Still quite usable. How bad is it in that one?
</font>[/QUOTE]Oh, the T4 Naval Architect's Manual is still usable, particularly for what I wanted it for (ideas for things to include in my deckplans). The sloppy scanning is mostly annoying because it's on quite a few pages. The angle isn't more than 5-10 deg on any page that I've seen (I haven't gone through the entire book page by page). Quite usable, but disappointingly sloppy and unprofessional looking.

Ron

 

[vutpakdi]

Originally posted by hunter:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Ron Vutpakdi:
I'm more concerned about the sloppy scanning with pages askew (T4's Naval Architect Manual).

I've seen this a bit in the 2300 book but it is not too bad. Still quite usable. How bad is it in that one?
</font>[/QUOTE]Oh, the T4 Naval Architect's Manual is still usable, particularly for what I wanted it for (ideas for things to include in my deckplans). The sloppy scanning is mostly annoying because it's on quite a few pages. The angle isn't more than 5-10 deg on any page that I've seen (I haven't gone through the entire book page by page). Quite usable, but disappointingly sloppy and unprofessional looking.

Ron

 

[vutpakdi]

Originally posted by hunter:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Ron Vutpakdi:
I'm more concerned about the sloppy scanning with pages askew (T4's Naval Architect Manual).

I've seen this a bit in the 2300 book but it is not too bad. Still quite usable. How bad is it in that one?
</font>[/QUOTE]Oh, the T4 Naval Architect's Manual is still usable, particularly for what I wanted it for (ideas for things to include in my deckplans). The sloppy scanning is mostly annoying because it's on quite a few pages. The angle isn't more than 5-10 deg on any page that I've seen (I haven't gone through the entire book page by page). Quite usable, but disappointingly sloppy and unprofessional looking.

Ron

 

[aramis]

Assuming a copy was sacrificed for the scanning, then there is 0 reason for the sloppy scans.

if they didn't sacrifice it (ie, chop the binding off), then it can be fairly hard to get straigh scans.

 

[aramis]

Assuming a copy was sacrificed for the scanning, then there is 0 reason for the sloppy scans.

if they didn't sacrifice it (ie, chop the binding off), then it can be fairly hard to get straigh scans.