Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Welcome to the new COTI server. We've moved the Citizens to a new server. Please let us know in the COTI Website issue forum if you find any problems.
We, the systems administration staff, apologize for this unexpected outage of the boards. We have resolved the root cause of the problem and there should be no further disruptions.
Maybe the hydrographics and atmosphere codes got swapped around? Some of Mark Humphreys' sectors also have typos where government and law level codes got swapped around, so I suspect something similar in this case.
Maybe the hydrographics and atmosphere codes got swapped around? Some of Mark Humphreys' sectors also have typos where government and law level codes got swapped around, so I suspect something similar in this case.
There was a brief period when Hydrographic codes higher than A were available in, IIRC, a T5 draft. They were meant to represent rocky core water balls and coreless water balls, aka Panthallasic worlds. The idea did not survive the draft period.
There was a brief period when Hydrographic codes higher than A were available in, IIRC, a T5 draft. They were meant to represent rocky core water balls and coreless water balls, aka Panthallasic worlds. The idea did not survive the draft period.
When I generated some my earlier sectors (esp. this one), I got some of the UWPs with swapped digits, so it is all my doing, rather than using draft T5. It looks like they have been corrected by inexorabletash already.
All of the stuff I generated was random (other than the location of two systems mentioned in GURPS / CT K'kree aliens. So should they be replaced by place holders, like the newer K'kree sectors being worked on -- and indeed the same for the Hiver sectors that I generated ?
All of the stuff I generated was random (other than the location of two systems mentioned in GURPS / CT K'kree aliens. So should they be replaced by place holders, like the newer K'kree sectors being worked on -- and indeed the same for the Hiver sectors that I generated ?
Not necessarily, as long as the data errors are fixed and worlds are manually checked in order to make sure everything makes sense. Jim Kundert's K'kree sectors only have placeholder worlds because they are still works-in-progress - they are not meant to permanently be that way.
Indeed. Nothing wrong with random at this stage, as long as it is the correctly applied random. The K'kree actually pay attention to the physical characteristics of a world when generating the population, which makes their UWP process different. You actually used that process, so barring corrections there is no need to regress to partial placeholders.