• Welcome to the new COTI server. We've moved the Citizens to a new server. Please let us know in the COTI Website issue forum if you find any problems.
  • We, the systems administration staff, apologize for this unexpected outage of the boards. We have resolved the root cause of the problem and there should be no further disruptions.

Contragrav

Libris

SOC-12
In FFS2 contragrav seems a bit underpowered when it comes to lateral thrust. The maximum acceleration appears to be about 0.16g if I'm reading page 65 correctly :confused: . As currently written, Thrusters are way more powerful and with thrust equal to 400kN per cubic metre are not far off the lift capabilities of contragrav. I think a correction is required and some geek speak required to explain why contragrav is used and not thrusters. I think it is necessary to divide a contragrav unit into two components, a thrust component and a lift component.

I am seriously contemplating rewriting FFS2 (simply for my own amusement) with errata included and various house rules incorporated. Then again... ;)
 
In FFS2 contragrav seems a bit underpowered when it comes to lateral thrust. The maximum acceleration appears to be about 0.16g if I'm reading page 65 correctly :confused: . As currently written, Thrusters are way more powerful and with thrust equal to 400kN per cubic metre are not far off the lift capabilities of contragrav. I think a correction is required and some geek speak required to explain why contragrav is used and not thrusters. I think it is necessary to divide a contragrav unit into two components, a thrust component and a lift component.

I am seriously contemplating rewriting FFS2 (simply for my own amusement) with errata included and various house rules incorporated. Then again... ;)
 
I haven't read the rules in a while, but wasn't contra-grav "only" for negating the gravitational pull of the world? The thrust was supposed to come from an additional agency IIRC.
 
I haven't read the rules in a while, but wasn't contra-grav "only" for negating the gravitational pull of the world? The thrust was supposed to come from an additional agency IIRC.
 
Yes, but CT defined an air-raft as using contragrav lift and propulsion so FFS2 does the same; just not very well.
 
Yes, but CT defined an air-raft as using contragrav lift and propulsion so FFS2 does the same; just not very well.
 
Presumably contragrav is directional, and 0.16G might be reasonable for thrusting nearly perpendicular to the ambient gravitational field.
 
Presumably contragrav is directional, and 0.16G might be reasonable for thrusting nearly perpendicular to the ambient gravitational field.
 
Back
Top