• Welcome to the new COTI server. We've moved the Citizens to a new server. Please let us know in the COTI Website issue forum if you find any problems.
  • We, the systems administration staff, apologize for this unexpected outage of the boards. We have resolved the root cause of the problem and there should be no further disruptions.

coal

Originally posted by Andy Fralix:
Brings up an interesting point. If we know it has been done before, surely we can find out how to do it again. Don't remember who wrote the story, but in the SiFi world there is a short story about a future society re-building Earth after some man-made disaster wipes out civilization.
Andy,

Half the Battle. Harry Turtledove wrote it well before he became another victim of Bloated Serial Novelist Disease, aka King-Clancy-Michener Syndrome.

A post-Collapse kingdom in SoCal finds enough hints to 'rediscover' the gatling gun, win a war, and realize that knowing something is possible is 'half the battle' . Less than a decade later they have alcohol fueled aircraft. A generation later they have orbital shuttles and less than a generation after that they have warp drive thanks to a chance 'discovery' of a 'tech manual' from the 'Federation of Planets'.


Have fun,
Bill
 
Reminds me of one of those "huh?" moments: in Star Trek, the Previous Vessels Called Enterprise displays they often have include the NASA Shuttle. But that was named after the Trek ship. So the Star Trek TV show must exist in the Star Trek universe...
 
Originally posted by epicenter00:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Andrew Boulton:
I read an interesting article recently. If we ever get blasted back to the stone age, we're buggered. Most fiction assumes we'd drag ourselves back up without too much trouble, but in fact it would be very hard because we've used up all the easily-accessible metals and fossil fuels.
I've heard this particular arguement over and over again, and I've believed it for various points in my life (when you play Twilight: 2000 a lot, you run into this particular topic a lot more than the average person). However, I think in many ways this would be countered by exploiting marginal resource beds. A rebuilding society, at least in the early stages, is not going to need the vast quantities of resources that modern Western society requires. I think exploitation of trash dumps, reworking existing metals, and marginal resource bed exploitation would be enough to reach a critical mass to start exploitation of "deep mines" and such.

For instance, we don't really think of places like Greece or middle/southern Italy as strong areas for iron production, but historically, they yielded enough iron and such to make weapons and tools. Nobody mines in these places today because the density of iron ore isn't enough - there's other places where it's a lot easier to exploit, but that doesn't mean the iron there just vanishes like some Sid Meier videogame. There's still quite a bit there and it can still be exploited. It's just not enough warrant the kind of mining in scale that modern mining requires to turn a profit, but certainly enough to exploit if the desire and need was there and the needs were not too demanding.
</font>[/QUOTE]For a more recent example look up "Emergency Mines" (Notbergbau) in germany post WWI and WWII.

Basically: The german deep mines where bombed and or flodded but coal was needed. So instead of tackeling the huge coal shoals at 500+ m, the people began mining the "Bentingsbank" Shoal at around 30m like it was done in the 1700rds. Some of these where done officially, others where illegal mines often using "all muscles" equipment.

Or look up chinas illegal coal mines, basically 19th century tech and 19th century deathrates.


As for uses of coal:

+ You can process it into fuels (Leuna-Method, used in WWII)

+ It is used in some filtration systems (Aktivkohle - http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aktivkohle ) (Sorry, I don't know the english term)

+ IIRC industrial diamons are based on this stuff


As for using it in power plants: Modern units are among the cleanest fossile power plants. And coal is generally more common than oil.

As for central heating: I have not used a coal chute in a decade. And we are still heating with coal. Modern bunkerage systems and automatic burners have a service quality close to a modern oil burner
 
Originally posted by Kurega Gikur:
Add to this that many new engineers don’t know how to design off of the computer (at least here in the US). My father-in-law complains about this occasionally. Before anyone gets their knickers in a twist the implication is not that modern engineers are stupid but that many current technologies are based on other technologies and skills that are not easily reproducible.
This is true of map-making as well - the university I attended dropped drawing maps by hand from its introductory cartography course two years after I graduated, moving everything to GIS instead.

I understand the reason for the change, but I'm glad I learned it the traditional way first.
 
In my mind the big thing that would hold any society back from technological recovery is the political system. A repressive regime can stifle innovation, nuke the economy, and foster internal violence.

No government would be just as bad. Small clans of people holding on for dear life would be spending their time just surviving.

Enough people left unsupervised seems to result in violence.
Yes I think Hobbs was right (in parts)
 
A society where the government is too supportive of the citizens or where the citizens are too well-cushioned is also a problem for recovery. Can you imagine if LA were cut off from the rest of the world, lost its tech, and had to recover? Nobody would be eating their dogs, because they wouldn't know how to kill or cook them anyway.
file_28.gif
 
Fritz,

In all honestly LA wouldn’t survive a prolonged cable TV outage much less a collapse of civilization.

Once the plastic surgeons fled town there would be no economy left and the actors would revert to their natural gelatinous state.
 
Something brought to mind by this topic is: how many planets in the OTU actually have indigenous life forms? Is there any canon reference to this? Going by published sources, quite a few places seem to have some level of local ecology. If, on the other hand, the majority of inhabited worlds are terraformed in some way, coal, oil and natural gas could be an extremely rare commodity.
 
An interesting note about the amount of time people would be spending 'surviving':

It is very, VERY Dependent on the environment and climate. In some places on this planet, people who live a lifestyle where they just do enough to survive, only have to do about 8 hours of work a WEEK, each. That's it. The rest of the time they tell stories and play games with little pebbles and make sand mosaics and stuff. Granted, that sort of lifestyle would require an idyllic environemnt and abundant food, water, shelter, etc. And, in such a situation, a population wouldn't be under a lot of pressure to advance technologically.
 
^You’re right, nomads don’t generally produce many starships.

Firearms change everything. Combine that with any kind of agriculture and population and you will have bloody conflict.
 
Originally posted by Kurega Gikur:
^.... Before anyone gets their knickers in a twist the implication is not that modern engineers are stupid but that many current technologies are based on other technologies and skills that are not easily reproducible.
...
As a former machinist, I have woundered how the first lathe was made to cut threads. Today, you just go to your lathe (and milling machines,etc.) and machine the parts to make a lathe, but how was the first one made?

I guess we would have to learn how to walk all over again.
 
As a former machinist, I have woundered how the first lathe was made to cut threads. Today, you just go to your lathe (and milling machines,etc.) and machine the parts to make a lathe, but how was the first one made?

I guess we would have to learn how to walk all over again.
The first lathes were made of wood and used a simple bow mechanism (akin to the method of lighting a fire). It wan't till the 15th century where flywheels and treddles were used. As to manufacture, a skilled woodworker could carve one out.
 
Back
Top