Thnaks Bill,
Good sources of info. As you discuss it further I'm liking the picture the science as we know it paints. The collisional heating brings prospecting back to the picture of Belt mining. The big ones like Vesta etc. (besides being prime base/habiatat sites) will be mined out early, so the initial comapny/group that settles will do well. It sounds like the follow-on belters will be looking for that lucky strike (a hunk of differentiated material from maybe a broken up larger asteroid).
I like the many parallels that can be drawn between belt mining and 19th century mining when the undifferentiated nature of asteroids comes into play.
I agree, density and differntaition are two different things. Just brought it up because of the Mathilde data you referenced. Likewise composition (as determined by spectroscopy) and differentiation are different things. In addition, spectroscopy from a distance is only going to give you an indication of "surface" composition. So in the end, there is going to still be the need for a lot of going and looking work. The use of small robot probes makes sense (along with probe jumping, probe spyware (have the other guys probe tell you what it found etc.)).
Have to read E2-4601's stuff, it looks very good.
Good sources of info. As you discuss it further I'm liking the picture the science as we know it paints. The collisional heating brings prospecting back to the picture of Belt mining. The big ones like Vesta etc. (besides being prime base/habiatat sites) will be mined out early, so the initial comapny/group that settles will do well. It sounds like the follow-on belters will be looking for that lucky strike (a hunk of differentiated material from maybe a broken up larger asteroid).
I like the many parallels that can be drawn between belt mining and 19th century mining when the undifferentiated nature of asteroids comes into play.
I agree, density and differntaition are two different things. Just brought it up because of the Mathilde data you referenced. Likewise composition (as determined by spectroscopy) and differentiation are different things. In addition, spectroscopy from a distance is only going to give you an indication of "surface" composition. So in the end, there is going to still be the need for a lot of going and looking work. The use of small robot probes makes sense (along with probe jumping, probe spyware (have the other guys probe tell you what it found etc.)).
Have to read E2-4601's stuff, it looks very good.