2320AD claims (p. 310) that
"There is a subtle time distortion involved with the stutterwarp drive operation, such that clocks on the vessels are out by approximately 1 second per light year once they’ve finished their voyage, compared to local clocks using Sirius as an astronomical reference point. No one knows the cause of the apparent time-dilation, but apart from having to reset
timepieces it doesn’t cause any problems."Hmm, what's the deal with this? First, I doubt any anomalies with the stutterwarp wouldn't be heavily investigated - any apparent oddness might be the key to a better drive or understanding physics better. Second, why Sirius as reference point? The sun is a far more natural one.
That there might be time dilations with stutterwarp use is not strange: given that "instantaneous" and "simultaneous" doesn't have any meaning in relativity it may just be that each jump moves the ship (relative to the original reference frame) not just a distance but a tiny amount forward in time; this is just as likely as it not doing it - and for a passing observer at another speed the jumps will look simultaneous or have another time difference. It is just that relative to the local velocity field they have a small time component.
[ Any FTL drive is a potential time machine after all. The second could just as well have been lost as gained. As I handle it, micro-experiments have confirmed that one can indeed do time travel with stutterwarps, it is just that the Novikov quantum self-consistency principle holds so paradoxes are not possible. To send an entire ship back in time requires relativistic speeds, something that has not been achieved in 2320 - and the Novikov principle suggests that it would be pretty pointless. ]
Setting up interstellar time is an interesting challenge. The trick is to use the speed of light, since it is the same for everybody, regardless of how fast they (or their solar system) are moving. Ignoring general relativity, a simple method would be to send a radio signal from Earth to all other systems. If the signal is sent at January 1 2300 00:00 GMT and you know you are exactly ten lightyears away when it reaches you, then it must be January 1 2310 GMT (OK, I'm ignoring leapyears, leap seconds and the other awful mess of actual timekeeping). So finding exact positions of every system and world together with a few timing signals to set local atomic clocks (with adjustments for gravitational time dilation, relative motion and other messy factors) would enable to set up a universal human time (Temps Atomique Interstellar, run by the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM)). Using the signals from millisecond pulsars allows independent verification that everything is consistent to a high precision. The local TAI time can then be used to set the local universal coordinated time system, from which local timezones can be derived.
To sum up, I think the extra second is likely not mysterious at all, and I don't think Sirius has anything to do with it.
Added later: here is a paper showing just how complex timekeeping is across an interplanetary network.
"There is a subtle time distortion involved with the stutterwarp drive operation, such that clocks on the vessels are out by approximately 1 second per light year once they’ve finished their voyage, compared to local clocks using Sirius as an astronomical reference point. No one knows the cause of the apparent time-dilation, but apart from having to reset
timepieces it doesn’t cause any problems."
That there might be time dilations with stutterwarp use is not strange: given that "instantaneous" and "simultaneous" doesn't have any meaning in relativity it may just be that each jump moves the ship (relative to the original reference frame) not just a distance but a tiny amount forward in time; this is just as likely as it not doing it - and for a passing observer at another speed the jumps will look simultaneous or have another time difference. It is just that relative to the local velocity field they have a small time component.
[ Any FTL drive is a potential time machine after all. The second could just as well have been lost as gained. As I handle it, micro-experiments have confirmed that one can indeed do time travel with stutterwarps, it is just that the Novikov quantum self-consistency principle holds so paradoxes are not possible. To send an entire ship back in time requires relativistic speeds, something that has not been achieved in 2320 - and the Novikov principle suggests that it would be pretty pointless. ]
Setting up interstellar time is an interesting challenge. The trick is to use the speed of light, since it is the same for everybody, regardless of how fast they (or their solar system) are moving. Ignoring general relativity, a simple method would be to send a radio signal from Earth to all other systems. If the signal is sent at January 1 2300 00:00 GMT and you know you are exactly ten lightyears away when it reaches you, then it must be January 1 2310 GMT (OK, I'm ignoring leapyears, leap seconds and the other awful mess of actual timekeeping). So finding exact positions of every system and world together with a few timing signals to set local atomic clocks (with adjustments for gravitational time dilation, relative motion and other messy factors) would enable to set up a universal human time (Temps Atomique Interstellar, run by the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM)). Using the signals from millisecond pulsars allows independent verification that everything is consistent to a high precision. The local TAI time can then be used to set the local universal coordinated time system, from which local timezones can be derived.
To sum up, I think the extra second is likely not mysterious at all, and I don't think Sirius has anything to do with it.
Added later: here is a paper showing just how complex timekeeping is across an interplanetary network.
Last edited: