• Welcome to the new COTI server. We've moved the Citizens to a new server. Please let us know in the COTI Website issue forum if you find any problems.
  • We, the systems administration staff, apologize for this unexpected outage of the boards. We have resolved the root cause of the problem and there should be no further disruptions.

The other star Vikings

If any of you have read my story 'Here be Dragons', you know I made up a mercenary organization for the Sword worlders. The Viking legion. I need to make up a symbol for them. I was hoping to avoid anything silly. So no helmets with horns or wings. Anyone have any suggestions? They are a TL 12 mix of starmercs and ground units.
 
Ouroboros

Similar to the Dragon, try Jormundgandr, the World Serpent. It is often represented many ways. One symbol that stands out to me is the ouroboros, the serpent that creates a circle coming to touch or bite its own tail. The World Serpent features prominently in Norse Mythology and should fit in with the Aesirists of the Sword Worlds Confederation. During Ragnarok, Thor battles the World Serpent. He kills the serpent but dies from its multiple venomous bites. Thor 0, Jormundganr 0.

From the archives of Net-7 News, this is the Pakkrat.
 
This may be too "Eastern"...did the Vikings have Houses like the Japanese? A banner with the family symbol like a chrysanthemum...
 
This may be too "Eastern"...did the Vikings have Houses like the Japanese? A banner with the family symbol like a chrysanthemum...
No. The Norse were not feudal. "Viking" is not a culture, it implies an ad hoc raiding or trading party.

Midgárðsormr (aka Jormundgandr) is a monster, an enemy of the Norse gods, and hence the Norse. Probably not a good symbol...

At a guess the leader's name (e.g. Hammer's Slammers) might be a good name for a Viking organisation. Alliteration was common, so perhaps something like Björn's Berserks or Thorbjörn's Thunder. You should probably use the leader's first name; the Norse didn't use family names, only patrynoms: Björnsson (or Björnsdottir for females) literally means that your father was named Björn ("Bear"). Famous people had added names like Harald Blåtand ("Bluetooth" = bad teeth) or Sigurd Jorsalafar (traveller to Jerusalem).

Perhaps warlike animals like wolf, bear, or lynx might make a good symbols.
 
[FONT=arial,helvetica]
AnotherDilbert said:
At a guess the leader's name (e.g. Hammer's Slammers) might be a good name for a Viking organisation. Alliteration was common, so perhaps something like Björn's Berserks or Thorbjörn's Thunder. You should probably use the leader's first name; the Norse didn't use family names, only patrynoms: Björnsson (or Björnsdottir for females) literally means that your father was named Björn ("Bear"). Famous people had added names like Harald Blåtand ("Bluetooth" = bad teeth) or Sigurd Jorsalafar (traveller to Jerusalem).

Perhaps warlike animals like wolf, bear, or lynx might make a good symbols.

Another thing Germanics (both Scandinavian and Anglo-Saxon) were fond of were riddles and plays on words. For example, the name of hero "Beowulf" literally means "Bee-Wolf", which was a riddle for "Bear", as it is an allusion to the fact that bears love honey.
[/FONT]
 
No. The Norse were not feudal. "Viking" is not a culture, it implies an ad hoc raiding or trading party.

The Norse system was close enough to Feudal that many historians DO consider it such... but it had some democratic elements, which lead others not to.

A lot depends upon how one defines Feudal.

If it's "A system where those in charge swear personal service and protection of an overlord in exchange for being put in charge, and the ruler swears reciprocal service and protection to the person and their family" - which is the essence of the Oath of Fealty - then, yes, the Norse were effectively feudal - the king swore to the Allþing. The Jarls to the king.

If one focuses on Subinfeudation as the key feature, again, the Norse can be seen as such. The Cynig had the right to create Jarls , and the Jarls the Ceorls .
The Ceorls could call upon the Cynig, as men of his man, the Jarl. (And the Jarls occasionally switched which king they were held to for a variety of reasons.) Ceorls sometimes deposed their Jarls, too.

English Feudalism arises from Angle and Saxon proto-feudal systems (which meet both definitions above, and which is functionally still the system for the 12th C Norse Vikingr). If the English by the 12th C were feudal, then so were the Norse.

The issue that causes some not to see Norse as Feudal is that inheritance was not automatic. It's the same issue with Traveller nobility - until the Þhing/Moot meets and confirms the Cynig/Emperor. And the Archdukes in Traveller can create subinfeudated Baronets and Knights, just like the power to make Ceorls was nominally the Norse Cynyg's but in practice was the Jarls'.
 
The Norse were not a single polity, nor had they exactly the same legal system, even if they resembled each other. The political systems in Scandinavia shifted quite a lot from 700 - 1200. The political systems in Sweden, Denmark, Norway, and Iceland separated into distinctly different systems. Only Denmark developed a rather feudal system with time.

Calling it a feudal system is vast stretch. There were no nobles, no fiefs, and no serfs. Slavery was certainly practiced. It was very different from contemporary continental systems, or the Norman English system.

There is a severe lack of reliable written sources for almost the entire period, given the lack of centralised governments or archives, and later the church's hostility towards anything written in runes, so giving exact details about the political systems of the Norse is speculative at best.
 
[FONT=arial,helvetica]Another thing Germanics (both Scandinavian and Anglo-Saxon) were fond of were riddles and plays on words. For example, the name of hero "Beowulf" literally means "Bee-Wolf", which was a riddle for "Bear", as it is an allusion to the fact that bears love honey. [/FONT]
Known as a kenning, e.g.
Food of the raven = dead,
Giver of gold = king.
 
You are bringing up good points. But I'm not really worried about names. The unit I've got in mind is more like the german condor legion from the Spanish civil war. "Volunteers" are assigned to "mercenary" units to get combat and operational training. And to test out new weapons and vehicles. According to the 1105 data, the worlds of the SWC that are still independent in 1202 were TL 10 and 11. According to the Regency source book they are become TL 12 and 13. They are going to need to learn how to use their new gear. These are not raiders in circa 1202, not 'proper' vikings. At least not yet. I'm planning of having them meet up with RC star vikings.

SWC: "How dare you call yourselves Star Vikings!"
RC: "What are you talking about?"
SWC: "WE'RE the real Star Vikings!"
RC: "Uh, ok?" Turns to nearby Regency officer and whispers "What is he talking about?"
Reg:Rolls eyes "Oh no, here we go again! Crazy swordies!"
 
Also keep in mind that since I'm talking about Sword worlders, they will have things about their Scandinavian ancestors wrong. According to both the GIRPS and Mongoose books about the Sword worlds "These values took their roots from a romanticised re-telling of the Gram’s history as much as from an even more romanticized version of the Viking Age on Old Terra." After all, if we can't agree on the details of what happened 1300 years ago on our own world, imagine what it will be like in another 3000 years, a thousand light years away.

"Some centuries past the Sword worlders had gone through a 'Viking' revival. They had tried to remake their society based on a highly romanticized vision of their ancient Scandinavian forebears. When Caroline was younger she had been a huge history buff and she had read some copies of the surviving history texts about the original Vikings. She had realized that they had gotten some of the major details of the real Vikings badly wrong. By modern standards most of the Scandinavians that had actually gone 'a Viking' would be classified as having serious mental illnesses. But, during the dark ages, what later generations would consider insane, were merely survival traits. Even admirable, heroic.
One of the other things that had stood out to Caroline in her studies was that those ancient peoples tended to see the humor in life. They lived, for the most part, short brutal lives. Yet they tried to, as much as possible, enjoy life. Somehow the sword worlders had missed that part. Her people tended to be grim, stoic, humorless even." Quote from "Here be dragons"
 
Back
Top