Fun Stuff!
The Phaistos Disk -- if it isn't a forgery -- is an example of using Minoan seals (you know, the kind used to impress wet clay or wax with a symbol or coat of arms or whatnot) to write stuff. Not a printing press, but quite handy nevertheless. Solves the problem of people who learn to write after they're adults (after all, these folks didn't need to be primarily or even typically literate).
Of course, the Chinese had woodblock art, and woodblock characters for "printing" for a long time.
I don't know if the Shriekers' Sun Worshipper Empire had moveable type. The Great Retreat does. Both writing systems are logographic.
Not that they couldn't've standardized. But they didn't need to... they were craftsmen being paid for their craft -- like when an artisan is paid by a noble for a work of art, or like where public writings are like the Book of Kells - it has to be Truth and Beauty, mass-consumed, but not mass-produced.
You don't need metallurgy at all. You can carve woodblocks into moveable type. You can cast clay ones, too. (Carve negative into a waxed slate or board. Press clay into it, let dry. Remove clay, and fire, possibly glazing, scraping the glaze from the working face before glaze firing.)
It can be done entirely with stone/bone tools.
The Phaistos Disk -- if it isn't a forgery -- is an example of using Minoan seals (you know, the kind used to impress wet clay or wax with a symbol or coat of arms or whatnot) to write stuff. Not a printing press, but quite handy nevertheless. Solves the problem of people who learn to write after they're adults (after all, these folks didn't need to be primarily or even typically literate).
Of course, the Chinese had woodblock art, and woodblock characters for "printing" for a long time.
I don't know if the Shriekers' Sun Worshipper Empire had moveable type. The Great Retreat does. Both writing systems are logographic.
And no need for printing... not much need for writing in general either.The issue for Aztec/Nahuatl is that it is primarily logograms, with some phonograms in a syllabary, and some rebus writing as well.
And Mayan writing was done by artists... creative calligraphers. So they did artistic things with their writing system that doesn't work completely well with static forms - conflation, composition, fusion, fun stuff all.Mayan has a more refined syllabary... but...
The issue is similar to the Korean Hangul, except that instead of single sounds per component, it's single syllable per component. 76 syllables KNOWN, most with 3 forms, and those forms are usually (1) a full block form, (2) a half block form, and either (3a) a quarter block form or (3b) a 1/3 block form. A single word usually fills one block. Mayan also still has logograms.
Not that they couldn't've standardized. But they didn't need to... they were craftsmen being paid for their craft -- like when an artisan is paid by a noble for a work of art, or like where public writings are like the Book of Kells - it has to be Truth and Beauty, mass-consumed, but not mass-produced.