I have some frustration around control panels in the T5 ship builder. The rules state that every mechanism requires one control panel per 35 tons (or part thereof) which implies that a 50 bay weapon would require two control panels and two total consoles (in order to avoid multitasking penalties).
However, the Kinunir example (pg. 49 book 2 T5.10) shows three panels total for two 50 ton bays with four tons of console. Going by the rest of the example this is probably two spacious consoles like with everything else in the ship. That would imply that bay weapon tonnage is aggregated for the purposes of "mechanism" and that one of the Kinunir's bays is used with multitasking when firing. Meanwhile, every turret has its own single control panel and console, which goes against that interpretation.
How have people squared this? Which rule is used? Does a single 100 ton bay require three control panels and three consoles or three controls panels and one console?
My inclination is to treat multitasking as per-mechanism rather than per control panel but for very large ships that might run into obvious staffing inconsistencies with, say, a 300 ton drive. Or not. Either way, I can't seem to find a good answer to the disconnect between the rules and the example.
However, the Kinunir example (pg. 49 book 2 T5.10) shows three panels total for two 50 ton bays with four tons of console. Going by the rest of the example this is probably two spacious consoles like with everything else in the ship. That would imply that bay weapon tonnage is aggregated for the purposes of "mechanism" and that one of the Kinunir's bays is used with multitasking when firing. Meanwhile, every turret has its own single control panel and console, which goes against that interpretation.
How have people squared this? Which rule is used? Does a single 100 ton bay require three control panels and three consoles or three controls panels and one console?
My inclination is to treat multitasking as per-mechanism rather than per control panel but for very large ships that might run into obvious staffing inconsistencies with, say, a 300 ton drive. Or not. Either way, I can't seem to find a good answer to the disconnect between the rules and the example.