For me, it's all of the above. I can live with the maps. But what I can't stand is the often randomly generated garbage that is simultaneously too detailed - if I'm writing with an eye to publication, I must use this source - and not detailed enough or detailed with silly data - yet another A212A20 2 orbiting a M0V, M2V, M9V trinary system and in the life zone too? (ok, that one is made up, but there are too many that are just as bad.)Originally posted by T. Foster:
Why does everybody hate this book so much? Just because the maps are so ugly? Because it gives too much information? Or not enough? .
Interesting. Personally the Shadows part of that double I love, as a classic enigmatic alien ruin. Pairing it with Mission on Mithril(?) is from the starter set, IIRC. The Mithril adventure I always thought a bit thin, but for doubles I found that acceptable. Secrets of the Ancients on the other hand is really rather too linear and lacking in drama for me. Which, given it's a sequel to Twilight's Peak, is a great shame: the latter for all its flaws can work very well.Originally posted by David Thomas:
Atlas of the Imperium had its faults, but I have a violent dislike for some of the adventures, particularly Double Adventure Mithril/Shadows, Research Station Gamma, and Secret of the Ancients.
The Chamax double adventure is bug-stomping heaven, though.
David