• Welcome to the new COTI server. We've moved the Citizens to a new server. Please let us know in the COTI Website issue forum if you find any problems.
  • We, the systems administration staff, apologize for this unexpected outage of the boards. We have resolved the root cause of the problem and there should be no further disruptions.

Jump drive efficiency and over-mass

dalthor

SOC-12
Sitting here thinking about my Nexus-class ship design update cycle, and got to thinking about jump drive efficiency and hull size when over-tonnage is involved.

For example, in an 800 ton hull, with Ultimate Jump-1 drive (130% efficiency), you could have as much as 240 tons excess, and still achieve jump. (800 x 1.3 = 1040)

This could cause me to seriously reconsider ship design - spend more money, smaller drive in larger hull, more available cargo space. Would the profit margin over the life of the ship cover that extra cost??

Am I correct in this? :oo:

For that matter, is the tech level efficiency chart on page 338 accurate, or should I use the chart on page 500 for some of this, as mentioned in the errata for other systems?

Dalthor
 
I have not worked out the math as of yet but I would expect the overage would pay for itself over the life of the ship or earlier depending on the cargo.
and unless it has been errata'd (don't see that) go ahead and assume 338 is accurate. (remember IMTU as always anyway )
 
Back
Top