• Welcome to the new COTI server. We've moved the Citizens to a new server. Please let us know in the COTI Website issue forum if you find any problems.
  • We, the systems administration staff, apologize for this unexpected outage of the boards. We have resolved the root cause of the problem and there should be no further disruptions.

Imperial Heraldry

Been lurking here for a few days, and thought I'd post this 'extra-Imperial' heraldry/Coat-of-Arms, I ginned up in '21, for a 'patent of nobility' that an NPC received.View attachment 6556
Phlange 1414 Asura.
Lakenan: Per bend Gules* and potenty argent and azure; two rosed barbed of the first and seeded argent in bend sinistre and in canton a thistle of the first.

If you change the color of the upper-right background, it will work better and not violate the (traditional Anglo-Norman) rules, since the roses and the thistle are essentially the same color as the upper right background. The simplest change would be to make the upper-right background Yellow/Gold ("Or"), which corrects the problem for both the thistle and the rose. Other than that color issue, however, this is quite good as heraldry.

Lakenan Shield.png
Lakenan (revised): Per bend Or and potenty argent and azure; two roses barbed gules* seeded argent in bend sinistre and in canton a thistle gules*.

* Note that this color (which I've blazoned as gules (red) could be anywhere from gules (red) to purpure (purple) to sanguine (blood-red) or murrey (maroon); it's not quite a "standard" blazonable color/stain.
 
I've seen some portray a Bezant as a coin as opposed to a golden circle, hence my "Roundel". It's the artistic license of the herald!
Yes, but this gets into "fiddly details" that aren't actually included in the blazon; two heraldic artists may disagree on whether a "roundel Or" should be depicted with or without coin-like detail; this sort of thing was usually determined by visual context - e.g., if the prevailing "good taste" art style gets into lots of rococo detail, you want your bezants/roundels Or to be depicted as coins; if you're going for a Danish Modern look, simple yellow dots is the order of the day. Almost universally, where one herald writes "roundel Or", another will write "bezant", and they will both agree that it means the same thing (and similarly for the other roundel names).
 
Lakenan: Per bend Gules* and potenty argent and azure; two rosed barbed of the first and seeded argent in bend sinistre and in canton a thistle of the first.

If you change the color of the upper-right background, it will work better and not violate the (traditional Anglo-Norman) rules, since the roses and the thistle are essentially the same color as the upper right background. The simplest change would be to make the upper-right background Yellow/Gold ("Or"), which corrects the problem for both the thistle and the rose. Other than that color issue, however, this is quite good as heraldry.

View attachment 7216
Lakenan (revised): Per bend Or and potenty argent and azure; two roses barbed gules* seeded argent in bend sinistre and in canton a thistle gules*.

* Note that this color (which I've blazoned as gules (red) could be anywhere from gules (red) to purpure (purple) to sanguine (blood-red) or murrey (maroon); it's not quite a "standard" blazonable color/stain.
The extent of knowledge I have, is that heraldry exists. I'm rather pleased this follows the 'accepted' display parameters, considering I spent little more than an afternoon cobbling it together in 'PS'. Consider it 'adopted'. Thank you!
 
Canada is not the first to add copper; it was added as the metallic for a rose color in eastern europe in the 17th C.
Sky was used as a metal in 17th C eastern European heraldry, too. Represented by brushed aluminum foil.
Neither were common. See Fox-Davies The Art of Heraldry. The big one, not the abridged ones.
 
Yes, but this gets into "fiddly details" that aren't actually included in the blazon; two heraldic artists may disagree on whether a "roundel Or" should be depicted with or without coin-like detail; this sort of thing was usually determined by visual context - e.g., if the prevailing "good taste" art style gets into lots of rococo detail, you want your bezants/roundels Or to be depicted as coins; if you're going for a Danish Modern look, simple yellow dots is the order of the day. Almost universally, where one herald writes "roundel Or", another will write "bezant", and they will both agree that it means the same thing (and similarly for the other roundel names).
If blazoned as bezants instead of rondels, the details become non-optional; they both count the same for needed differences, but are distinct at the blazon.

Many "fiddly details" are in fact in the blazon. Fine outlines (fimbriation), whether or not the line is scalloped or engrailed (which side the points are on)...

SCA herald of many years. Also have actually read all of Fox-Davies's TAOH. And some of his smaller works.
 
This was all a thought exercise based on the idea that sometimes the College of Heralds would add new standards if they suddenly needed the capacity to double the number of achievements granted. What would they add? As far as charges go, those are already added on a regular basis (even if they do not necessarily catch on). But tinctures are added rarely, so they would need to be iconic. Furs might be easier to justify, what would the 3I College of Heralds choose to add? I've supplied some of my own ideas in the thread (jaseroque, iridium), I'm gathering a lot of people either haven't given it much thought or go on a case-by-case basis.

Ironically, my players all made characters basically on the opposite end of the social spectrum, so I didn't end up needing any of the stuff I came up with.
 
This was all a thought exercise based on the idea that sometimes the College of Heralds would add new standards if they suddenly needed the capacity to double the number of achievements granted. What would they add? As far as charges go, those are already added on a regular basis (even if they do not necessarily catch on). But tinctures are added rarely, so they would need to be iconic. Furs might be easier to justify, what would the 3I College of Heralds choose to add? I've supplied some of my own ideas in the thread (jaseroque, iridium), I'm gathering a lot of people either haven't given it much thought or go on a case-by-case basis.

Ironically, my players all made characters basically on the opposite end of the social spectrum, so I didn't end up needing any of the stuff I came up with.
For reference, what actually happens isn't generally more charges nor tinctures...
it's reducing required distance count and breaking apart distinct variations into discrete charges. Such as distinguishing annulets from bezants and the various furs variations from each other.
And dividing fields and adding more layers of charges. 3 layer devices were actively discouraged in the SCA

For example, Estencile and Ermine have been separated in the SCA: ermine is 3 dots around the lengthened point of an offset lozenge (quadrangle), while estencile is spaced the same, and only has the three-dot clusters, leaving the tail missing (in fur, it's a small arc of fur). Estencile is also clear of a semy of rondels - the pattern of estencile being clear of a evenly or specific patterned group of small circles. (Estencile is considered a fur, and thus neutral, for color/metal purposes, but a semy of anything but Estencile and Ermine tails is not.)

The historical use of skye was brushed aluminum, but also used for water as a metal.
Copper, where used, was drawn pink, linked to carnation as a color.
The SCA still avoids the stains (Murrey, Sanguine, Tenne) even tho' they are documented to late SCA period... largely because of headarchs at checking purpure vs murrey vs sanguine.

The biggest problem of SCA Heraldry is that it is only heritable in the narrowest sense: you can will your SCA armory to your heir, but they have no right to it unless designated by will.

One other thing that the SCA did to open heraldic space was stop checking against the UK and Commonwealth arms; it only for the briefest period checked against German and French... but still blocks "notable mundane arms"... such as fieldless, 5 annulets interlaced.

Do note also: Heraldry has, largely, been supplanted by Trademark. The SCA is required to observe certain trademarks in its heraldry: ① Argent, a cross couped gules. (Red Cross), ② Argent, a crescent gules. (Red Crescent) ③ Fieldless, 5 annulets involved in chain azure, Or, sable, vert, gules. (International Olympic Committee). Note that the description in the trademark is simply 5 annulets involved... which got litigated against AEG over the original L5R cardback. ④ Vert. (one of the historic flags for Libya) ⑤ Paly of 13 gules and argent, on a chief azure, a semy of thirteen mullets of five points, 7 and 6, argent. (United States Arms) ⑥ Barry of thirteen gules and argent, upon a canton azure a semy of 50 mullets argent. (US flag)
 
For reference, what actually happens isn't generally more charges nor tinctures...
it's reducing required distance count and breaking apart distinct variations into discrete charges.

Do note also: Heraldry has, largely, been supplanted by Trademark.
Sure. But we're talking thousands of years and hundreds of alien cultures. I was trying to speculate on possibilities.

Also, the Office of Heraldry is part of the the Imperial Bureau of Trademarks, so that tracks.
 
Back
Top