Why only 150m? The WWII German weapon was grouping six inches at 1000m.Originally posted by Rover:
Well we're on the supbect, IMTU I was thinking of Beefing up the LAG to support weapon status and boosting the range to 150m. Basically it is a 20mm man portable cannon.
Any thoughts.
ACQ handles this nicely. It's got rules for creating beaten zones from suppressive fire.Originally posted by Zutroi:
The biggest shortage I've run across in canon cannon (so to speak) is the ability to properly do supression fire at high tech. There's just no equivalent to the BAR or the M-60.
Get the Striker rules. Republished in the BFB for Games. It has weapon design systems for everything from 20mm cannon and autocannon to 180cm really big guns plus gauss gun, lasers, plasma and fusion guns.Originally posted by Jame:
Alright, so there are no canon versions of heavy weapons. So let's hear some ideas on various weapons such as the M-60 or the Phalanx Autocannon, on up to the main gun of a tank.
Remember, I'm looking for mere projectile weapons, 'cause I'm soon to create an energy weapons topic here in the Ship's Locker!
Can there be anything cooler than real life. I suggest you do a web search on the OCSW (Objective Crew Served Weapon). 25mm smart explosive rounds that can be programed to explode over and around a target in increments of 1 meter and with an effective range out to 2000 meters.Originally posted by Jame:
What variations of heavy, as in squad and platoon support, weapons are there? FGMPs and PGMPs can't be it! (Plasma weapons are delicious, but I'd like to make another post out of them.)![]()
I've never seen the point of the LAG. It really is a poor weapon when compared to RL equivalents (Anti material weapons). The grenade launcher on the OICW far outclasses it.Originally posted by Rover:
Well we're on the supbect, IMTU I was thinking of Beefing up the LAG to support weapon status and boosting the range to 150m. Basically it is a 20mm man portable cannon.
Me neither. Well, it is a 1970s design, years bfore the Barrett M82, never mind fun toys like the Steyr IWS2000.Originally posted by Corejob:
I've never seen the point of the LAG. It really is a poor weapon when compared to RL equivalents (Anti material weapons). The grenade launcher on the OICW far outclasses it.
OCSW with tripod and fire control system weighs about the same as a FN-MAG machine gun with tripod. Besides the 25mm XM307 there is a 12.7mm (50 caliber) version called the XM312.Originally posted by Jame:
*Looks at Corejob's descriptions of OCSW and LOSAT* EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEvil Smile![]()