Garyius2003
SOC-13
Fast Backgound–presented as explanation, not as invite for real ife political debate:
Here in America we have been starting to defer our law making to federal agencies for whatever reason.
One of those laws that got deferred down is the rules for National Parks. The rules just changed, through a formal agency system, to allow holders of State Concealed Carry permits to carry their pistols in the park.
One of the rules for changing the rules is that environmental impacts must be studied, if there is a chance of an impact on the environment.
The course of the study once filed is that litigation will ensue for years, as each environmental group can argue about the scope of the study, the study methods, and the conclusions.
Some groups in American society don’t like guns, so they decided to block the new rule. Since there weren’t any good ways to do it, they were able to file a case before a liberal judge, and she ruled that a environment study needs to be done because the pistol may be used for defense against an animal which would change the environment.
Whatever your feelings on the core matter, her ruling is laughable on a logic and legal basis. By making the ruling, though, she gives the new president the chance to drop the new rule by not doing the study, and banning the pistols.
3I question:
In your 3I, is there room for this sort of gamesmenship? I play as an Empire of Men, rather than Laws, where the 3I is good for trade and defense and not caring much about the planets, so my 3I has never gotten to this level. The local (duke/count) may decide to overreact or keep studying something, or decide something one way or the other, but I have never tried to go for a full bore 1984 style ‘war is peace, A equals not A’ type of government. I did have a noble involved with a local government and megacorp to relocate an ethnic people and steal their land, but the noble and mega were involved in a criminal sense and would have been punished if caught.
I do feel strongly on one side of the underlying debate–but I also am impressed by the bold faced nature of the political trick and how it is working. I have been trying to think on how to use a system like the US for the 3I, but the only thing I can think of is a dark Imperium.
Does anyone have examples of a good or even gray 3I that uses this type of odd law making/governing?
Here in America we have been starting to defer our law making to federal agencies for whatever reason.
One of those laws that got deferred down is the rules for National Parks. The rules just changed, through a formal agency system, to allow holders of State Concealed Carry permits to carry their pistols in the park.
One of the rules for changing the rules is that environmental impacts must be studied, if there is a chance of an impact on the environment.
The course of the study once filed is that litigation will ensue for years, as each environmental group can argue about the scope of the study, the study methods, and the conclusions.
Some groups in American society don’t like guns, so they decided to block the new rule. Since there weren’t any good ways to do it, they were able to file a case before a liberal judge, and she ruled that a environment study needs to be done because the pistol may be used for defense against an animal which would change the environment.
Whatever your feelings on the core matter, her ruling is laughable on a logic and legal basis. By making the ruling, though, she gives the new president the chance to drop the new rule by not doing the study, and banning the pistols.
3I question:
In your 3I, is there room for this sort of gamesmenship? I play as an Empire of Men, rather than Laws, where the 3I is good for trade and defense and not caring much about the planets, so my 3I has never gotten to this level. The local (duke/count) may decide to overreact or keep studying something, or decide something one way or the other, but I have never tried to go for a full bore 1984 style ‘war is peace, A equals not A’ type of government. I did have a noble involved with a local government and megacorp to relocate an ethnic people and steal their land, but the noble and mega were involved in a criminal sense and would have been punished if caught.
I do feel strongly on one side of the underlying debate–but I also am impressed by the bold faced nature of the political trick and how it is working. I have been trying to think on how to use a system like the US for the 3I, but the only thing I can think of is a dark Imperium.
Does anyone have examples of a good or even gray 3I that uses this type of odd law making/governing?