Icosahedron
SOC-14 1K
Excuse the multiple warnings, but this thread is built on eggshells - please tread very carefully.
I've outlined the purpose, limits and ideals of the thread here:
http://www.travellerrpg.com/CotI/Discuss/showthread.php?t=20127
Please read this before continuing and only join in if you can resist the temptation to stray into political discussion. Academic history only, please.
I don't want my thread to be responsible for someone getting a warning or worse.
The idea for this alternate timeline was stimulated by a recent UK documentary about King Edward VIII.
My goal is similar to certain word puzzles, I want to go from a point in the real past to a point in the fictional alternative future, with the smallest number of changes along the way - and a minimum suspension of disbelief.
My alternative history begins with the 'butterfly event' that for whatever reason, Edward never met Wallis Simpson.
It needs to end with a 'Dark Empire' spanning many starsystems.
My initial suggestions:
If Edward never met Wallis, then the principal 'cause' of his abdication is removed, and hence his abdication is significantly less likely. Game result: Edward does not abdicate.
Edward was very popular with the people of Britain, but unpopular with the government thanks to his political leanings. If there was no change of monarch, and the monarch was supported by the people, there may have been a change of government instead. Game result: Britain's politics moves away from conflict with Germany.
As a result of this political swing (thanks in no small way to the popularity of the king and his outspoken support of Germany and Hitler) Oswald Moseley may stand in the 1940 General Election (or perhaps an early election would be forced). Game result: Moseley stands in an early election in the late '30s and gains a marginal (though no less effective) victory, which may or may not be via coalition with the non-interventionist Labour Party.
Note how I have described the historical political situation in a detached manner without expressing any opinions. That is how I believe we can discuss history without discussing politics.
So 20th Century historians, can belief be suspended so far? If not, what is wrong? Is there a simpler route to the required Anglo-German alliance that forms the proto Dark Empire?
Just historical facts please, no opinions. If your evidence is in any way political, give me a link to check out rather than arguing your point here. This is for your safety as well as mine.
Let's show the mods we can discuss (alternative) history responsibly.
I've outlined the purpose, limits and ideals of the thread here:
http://www.travellerrpg.com/CotI/Discuss/showthread.php?t=20127
Please read this before continuing and only join in if you can resist the temptation to stray into political discussion. Academic history only, please.

I don't want my thread to be responsible for someone getting a warning or worse.
The idea for this alternate timeline was stimulated by a recent UK documentary about King Edward VIII.
My goal is similar to certain word puzzles, I want to go from a point in the real past to a point in the fictional alternative future, with the smallest number of changes along the way - and a minimum suspension of disbelief.
My alternative history begins with the 'butterfly event' that for whatever reason, Edward never met Wallis Simpson.
It needs to end with a 'Dark Empire' spanning many starsystems.
My initial suggestions:
If Edward never met Wallis, then the principal 'cause' of his abdication is removed, and hence his abdication is significantly less likely. Game result: Edward does not abdicate.
Edward was very popular with the people of Britain, but unpopular with the government thanks to his political leanings. If there was no change of monarch, and the monarch was supported by the people, there may have been a change of government instead. Game result: Britain's politics moves away from conflict with Germany.
As a result of this political swing (thanks in no small way to the popularity of the king and his outspoken support of Germany and Hitler) Oswald Moseley may stand in the 1940 General Election (or perhaps an early election would be forced). Game result: Moseley stands in an early election in the late '30s and gains a marginal (though no less effective) victory, which may or may not be via coalition with the non-interventionist Labour Party.
Note how I have described the historical political situation in a detached manner without expressing any opinions. That is how I believe we can discuss history without discussing politics.
So 20th Century historians, can belief be suspended so far? If not, what is wrong? Is there a simpler route to the required Anglo-German alliance that forms the proto Dark Empire?
Just historical facts please, no opinions. If your evidence is in any way political, give me a link to check out rather than arguing your point here. This is for your safety as well as mine.

Let's show the mods we can discuss (alternative) history responsibly.
