Well, I am not so sure. Especially if we are talking about aboard a generation ship. There will be a tendancy aboard ship, due to the nature of the environment, both external as well as the artifical one created by the ship, to maintain training and maintenence. It is a matter of life and death, for the entire crew if the ship gets maintained.Originally posted by Tom Kalbfus:
I agree. Its a bit much to expect any society to last 13,200 years.
This would depend on the amount of maintenence the ship requires as well as how well a system has to be understood in order to repair it. Higer levels of maintenence and more detailed knowledge of the ship should prevent such social decay. The more automation the ship employs, the more likely this decent over the eons.Another possibility is that the inhabitants of the starship are reduced to savagery and tribalism.
Actually what I'm talking about is leaving human civilization behind. The builders of the ship had fears that human civilization was going to destroy itself. If human civilization didn't destroy itself then the ship would arrive at its destination with humans waiting for them, but the point was this ship is an insurance policy in case the builder's fears were realized. If the human race did destroy itself, then this ship is a chance to restart humanity anew on a different planet. One of the possible ways that they think humanity may destroy itself was from an over reliance on technology in their daily lives. Humanity was going to atrophy to death or so they feared, so to combat this they decided to separate the technology (robots) from the humans on the ship, and this brings me to the next point.You are talking about wiping out human civilization and starting over from scratch. And by introducing predators to keep down the human population, you are denying these folks all the tools we have developed over the centuries to deal with that threat. You are in essense condemning untold generations to a life of fear and misery.
The ship is fully automated, it has robots to repair itself and other robots. These robots stay out of the inhabited area unless they absolutely have to go there to perform ship maintenance. There is another habitate with no humans in it, only wild beasts and robot zookeepers. The animals are cloned from frozen tissue brought along on the ship for each animal type, this is to maintain genetic varity so that the animal populations don't inbreed. The resources of the starship are limited, if the humans hunted down all the predators and killed them, it would upset the ecological balance, so this second habitat has no humans in it, it is here that the adult animals are able to raise their young without human interference. When certain numbers of preditory beasts fall below a certain threshold then animals are transfered from one habitat to another. In the "Zoo" as the ship builders refered to it, predator animals typically outnumber prey animals. The robots provide sythetic meat for the predators to keep them alive and multiplying as a faster rate than the humans are killing them in the other habitat. If some humans get smart enough to find their way into the zoo, well all those predators can make their lives quite interesting until the robots catch them.Things break. Moving parts wear out, electronic parts break down, burn up, and fail. The ship will require maintenence from time to time, and that means a high tech understanding of how the ship works. So you are going to need some cadre of people to act "as God" and take care of the ship. Without it, the mission is a failure and the people end up dead.
Okay here is where you lose me. Things do not always fail in predictable ways. Sensors are limited, and that is why I have a job. To fix thing that cannot always be fixed automatically, or figured out by robots.Originally posted by Tom Kalbfus:
The ship is fully automated, it has robots to repair itself and other robots.
Umm.. no, that won't work. Go through Asimov's stories in "I, Robot" again. He goes all sorts of variations in the "3 Laws Safe". Ambiguity in target does not make the target inhuman. Such actions will result in harm to humans, and as such violate the first law of robotics.One possible complication would be if the androids are accused of "witchcraft" and burned at the stake. the robots can't defend themselves as they have "Three Laws" programming in them that prevents them from harming humans, it allows them to release predators into the human habitat because they don't know for sure that a specific animal will kill a specific human and they don't watch, all they know is that predators are good for humanity in general in such a way that exercise is good for a human individual.
Its not a matter of tech; its a matter of economics. The limiting factor is the exhaust velocity of state of the art rockets. If the exhaust velocity is 200 km/sec then the total change of velocity of a starship whose reaction mass takes up 50% in the Starship's initial mass is 200 km/sec. This is the cheapest form of transportation. A more expensive way to go would be laser sail. A giant laser accelerates a laser sail to 20% of the speed of light or 60,000 km/sec. Such a light sail separates into two parts, an outer ring that it 1000 km in diameter and an inner ring 100 km in diameter. A giant laser focuses on the 1000 km sail and accelerates the ship to 60,000 km/sec and then the ship cruises for 22 years and the the laser sail separates into an outer ring 1000 km in diameter with a hole in the center 100 km wide and the smaller 100 km wide sail. The 1000 km outer ring reflects the laser light projected from the Solar System to the smaller 100 km wide laser sail and slows it down. the total mass of the star ship is only 1000 tons for the payload and 1000 tons for the sail, but the expensive part is purchasing the services of a 1000 km wide laser sail and focusing lens for the duration of the mission. Not many can afford to travel to the stars this way so the payload constists of robots and a factory which can produce more of them out of local materials once the payload lands on the planet. The robots then produce more robots until there is enough robots in the labor force to begin terraforming the planet. Robots are more cost effective that way for the price of bringing them there. The humans take much longer to reproduce than robots, so they take the slow starship. Since it takes 10,000 years to get there, the robots make effective use of their time in terraforming the planet. The planet typically would not otherwise support humans except under domed settlement and if they are rushing a great expense to live under a dome on an uninhabitable planet, they might as well spend that time onboard a generation starship as it will take 10,000 years to properly terraform the planet in question to Earthlike conditions anyway. The worldship is huge on the order of billions of tons, and it is in the form of a cylinder 100 km wide and 500 km long, it rotates to simulate Earthlike gravity on its inner surface and the is a tall mountain range bisecting the cylinder into two segments each 250 km long. One segment houses the humans and on the other side of the mountain range is the "Zoo" where wild animals are raised by the robots. The only way to get to the Zoo from the habitiate is to either climb over the mountains or go through one of the tunnels underneath the mountains. The mountains are very high, about as tall as mount Everest.If the tech does not exist for the humans to cross x amount of space in less than 10,000 years, why does that tech exist to allow the robots to cross the same distance with enough time to spare to spend even a small fraction of that 10,00 years terraforming the world? If the robots are allowed that long to territory, then the world is
Why have we sent robotic probes to the outer planets but haven't yet sent a live astronaut farther than the moon? Because life support is far larger and more complicated than simple power supply and radiation shielding for a computer and various electronic and mechanical systems on the probes.Originally posted by Mr TeK:
If the tech does not exist for the humans to cross x amount of space in less than 10,000 years, why does that tech exist to allow the robots to cross the same distance with enough time to spare to spend even a small fraction of that 10,00 years terraforming the world?
For a 100 ton ship, the fuel required for a jump-2 drive is 20 tons; the cost of this jump drive is therefore MCr4. A jump-6 drive for this craft would cost MCr12.Originally posted by robject:
Howdy there,
How many folks out there have tried writing their own starship design rules, or tweaking an existing ruleset into unrecognizability?
I'd like to hear the collected wisdom from these people; what they wanted, what they tried, and what they learned in the process.
My current musings are about jump drives: we know that the real penalty in having a jump drive is in price and fuel requirements -- which is fine by me. I was wondering if it would simplify ship design if the jump drive itself were not especially large. For instance, suppose there is only one jump drive size, and cost is some base amount plus 10% of the fuel requirements (for 'jumpgrid calibration' or something):
</font><blockquote>code:</font><hr /><pre style="font-size:x-small; font-family: monospace;"> Tons Jump Rating Base Price (MCr)
10 1 1
10 2 2
10 3 3
10 4 4
10 5 5
10 6 6</pre>