• Welcome to the new COTI server. We've moved the Citizens to a new server. Please let us know in the COTI Website issue forum if you find any problems.
  • We, the systems administration staff, apologize for this unexpected outage of the boards. We have resolved the root cause of the problem and there should be no further disruptions.

Imperial Heraldry

AlHazred

SOC-12
Knight
I've been giving a little thought to heraldry in the Third Imperium. Over thousands of years, the rules would likely have changed to some extent, but heraldry is also an extremely conservative field — even today there is a lot of pushback to the Canadian College of Heralds adding "copper" as a third metal, and I have seen salty comments about Eastern European heralds using sable (black) as a fur so they can put it over metals and colors.

In traditional heraldry, there are seven hues that have their own archaic, French-derived names, which are collectively called tinctures. There are two metals (gold/yellow [or] and silver/white [argent]) and five colours* (red [gules], blue [azure], black [sable], green [vert], and purple [purpure]). There's a few more, called stains, but they're really rare and there's a lot of conservative heralds who won't touch them, claiming they are too close to already existing tinctures. The most common stains are maroon [murrey], blood-red [sanguine], and orange [tenné].

An important point is that the achievement of arms is a verbal description: "argent, a tree vert" for example. Exactly how this is depicted varies from herald to herald; as with all graphic artists, they are given some artistic latitude. But the tincture can also vary — all the different shades of green are "vert" and so on. This is the argument against many of the stains — for instance, that murrey is too similar to the colour purpure, sanguine to the colour gules, and tenné to the metal or. As the whole point is for the arms to be distinctive, this is a valid criticism of new tinctures.

The primary rule of heraldry is the rule of tincture: you can't put a metal on a metal or a colour on a colour. This is because the main thrust of heraldry is to make a personal symbol that can be easily-distinguished at a distance. You have to register your arms with the College primarily so they can make sure it's not sufficiently-similar to be mistaken for someone else's; this applies on a national level, so that a German could have the same arms as an Englishman (different Colleges).

The Imperium has an Office of Heraldry (from T4 Pocket Empires and G:T Nobles) — it's part of the Department that handles trademarks, which is very appropriate, actually.

Anyway, the only canonical guidance I could find on the subject was in MT Imperial Encyclopedia. On page 29, it mentions that Porfiria, in 247, ordered that the Imperial Sunburst would have no official color, since some species have vision far enough off-spectrum to Humaniti that the color palette doesn't work. On reading this, I initially thought that meant she abolished the rule of tincture; but in thinking about it further, I could see the Office of Heraldry instead deciding that the heraldic tinctures can change, based on species. For a Vargr, perhaps gules and vert are different colours, as they are somewhat red-green colorblind. This widens the application of heraldry while maintaining conservative heraldic values.

The other thing I noticed is the following paragraph, which mentions that the different branches prefer specific colors of the Sunburst: red for the Scouts; yellow for the Imperial Navy; black for the the Imperial Army; and maroon for the Imperial Marine. This makes me think of gules, or, sable, and murrey, so I think murrey is probably a regular Imperial heraldic element.

The other thing I think would be added is a new metal. IMTU, that new metal is iridium. Unfortunately, iridium does not have a weird colour; it's basically a shade of dark orange silver-grey. Ashen-grey (called cendrée) is already a stain in some French heraldry, so there's already some historical authenticity for a grey. I add this to the Imperial heraldry IMTU.

Has anyone done anything else with Imperial heraldic rules? I imagine rockets (in French, fusée) becoming a common element.

* Note: I'm not British, but the US doesn't generally have its own heraldic traditions so I bow to the English rules and spelling.
 
Some time back, my wife asked me what the Heraldry of the Domain of Deneb was?
Insignia, colors. etc...
At the time, I told her it would be, as was Norris' Regina, based on the Unicorn - Per Canon

When research couldn't answer the question more completely, I emailed Marc Miller.
His answer was to come up with something appropriate myself and then update the Wiki

I honestly presumed the use of SCA Heraldry, with which I'd worked for some decades.
I updated Marc and the Wiki and moved on.

EDIT: I used the Imperial Starburst instead of the Unicorn, because that was too iconographic of Regina
 
Since the Imperium can't even get the right animal on the Scouts logo I am not convinced that significant improprieties did not occur that would totally disregard any conventional rules.
That's a great comparison! In my campaign I frequently refer to the Futurama Effect, where Fry goes to a museum where they have a display showing George Washington and Abraham Lincoln fighting the Nazis in WWII. Some people nowadays aren't aware that George and Abe weren't contemporaries; how much worse will it be in the 57th Century? Heraldry enthusiasts now argue endlessly about which is the proper set of rules. Germany uses a lot of grey (eisenfarbe, "iron-colored"); Hungary (IIRC) treats sable as a fur so it can go with colours or metals; Canada uses cuivre (copper) as a metal; the USA treats buff (a terrible yellowish tincture) as a metal, while Canada treats it as a colour.

You just know the Imperium has its own peculiarities. For game purposes, they should be fun. For plausibility, they should fit canon.
 
Mention of furs reminded me I didn't put them in my heraldry primer is the first post.

For those who don't want to look into it, briefly, furs are a tincture that can go on either a metal or a colour. English heraldry has two primary furs: ermine (representing the winner coat of that animal) and vair (repenting the belly fur of the red squirrel). Ermine has four variations in English heraldry, and vair has two.

In the Imperium, we have canonical reference to a number of unusual animals. I think a likely candidate to have contributed to Imperial heraldry is the Crested Jabberwock. Hunting them is popular in the Solomani Sphere, so it has historical cache. Maybe a rainbow color spectrum is called jaseroque, which is Jabberwock in French.

I wish I'd thought of that for Pride Month!
 
One thing to note is that Arms were historically a personal heritable possession, and thus belonged properly to a single individual, and originally for the reason that you mentioned above, namely so that an individual could be clearly and distinctively identified on the field. That's why you ended up with all of those quarterings and differences and marks of cadence.

I am personally of the opinion that "Arms" in the proper sense wouldn't be used in the Imperium, as it is a simple matter for a Seneschal or other Functionary with a Comm and Aide to query the identity of another individual's Comm/Aide or a database who is not hiding his identity, rendering the function of personal Arms both superfluous and cumbersome.

Rather, I would think something more similar to the system of Badges & Livery would be the basis for "Family" or "House" heraldry, with certain prescribed distinctions or "ornate" differences of the basic device reserved for members of particular relation to the Active Substantive Noble, and a particular mark of distinction for the titleholder. The basic livery symbol could even be worn by the courtiers and retainers.

It may be that the old French terms and style are still used, but the rules may be entirely changed to accommodate a Family and House possession as opposed to an individual.
 
I am personally of the opinion that "Arms" in the proper sense wouldn't be used in the Imperium, as it is a simple matter for a Seneschal or other Functionary with a Comm and Aide to query the identity of another individual's Comm/Aide or a database who is not hiding his identity, rendering the function of personal Arms both superfluous and cumbersome.
Well, if it's just a matter of identification, then it makes sense that nobody nowadays (when biometrics and facial recognition tech can easily identify anyone) has any heraldry, or spends a lot of money having it professionally done, and that there are no Colleges of Heralds anywhere. ;)

I mean, it's done now as a status symbol, a connection to a glorified past history. That's going to be just as desired in the Third Imperium as now, whether the "glorified past" is the Ziru Sirka, or the Rule of Man, or the Sylean Federation, or something else. They'll have symbols related to that on their heraldry. And it will absolutely relate to livery and badges displayed by retainers.

Not everyone will do that. A lot of people probably pay it passing notice. But there will be a persistent undercurrent of people hyperfocused on the symbols of status, and this is a clear one.
 
Well, if it's just a matter of identification, then it makes sense that nobody nowadays (when biometrics and facial recognition tech can easily identify anyone) has any heraldry, or spends a lot of money having it professionally done, and that there are no Colleges of Heralds anywhere. ;)

I mean, it's done now as a status symbol, a connection to a glorified past history. That's going to be just as desired in the Third Imperium as now, whether the "glorified past" is the Ziru Sirka, or the Rule of Man, or the Sylean Federation, or something else. They'll have symbols related to that on their heraldry. And it will absolutely relate to livery and badges displayed by retainers.

Not everyone will do that. A lot of people probably pay it passing notice. But there will be a persistent undercurrent of people hyperfocused on the symbols of status, and this is a clear one.

Oh I am not arguing the "Status Symbol" or "Pedigree" issue. I am simply suggesting that the way "Personal Arms" as a "Personal Achievement" were done historically (in light of the contact with many other cultures: Vilani, Sylean, Geonee, Suerrat, et al) would likely be implemented differently (and more practically) perhaps by utilizing and modifying the imagery & iconography of the Badges & Livery system of Families & Houses, rather than specifying a unique set of Arms for an individual, passed down to a single heir, and then "differencing" cadet lines, and then differencing, quartering (etc) the cadet lines of those lines as well, etc. (Remember that in the Imperium all descendants of a Noble are Noble - not just in the Spear-line, but the Cadet-lines as well - unlike the British system, but like most Continental systems of Aristocracy). Nobility can potentially descend for several generations before petering out into mere "Untitled Gentry" in all of the branches of the family.

A think a smarter system could/would be devised with all of the culture(s) available to draw from, one that utilizes the basic livery of the family based on its badges and iconography used by the House and its retainers as a whole, but then apply the more specialized and fancier Noble styling to the actual members of the family, with particular flourishes or designations that mark out the title-holder, heir, spouse, and other cadet senior/junior generation immediate members of the family. Lesser members (a couple generations removed or so, might have a distinct but less distinguished family badge or emblem).

And of course, none of that is to say that certain families of Solomani extraction would not still maintain an Ancient Achievement of Arms passed down for many generations simply because the Imperial system has a new Heraldic Order. Their Imperial Arms / Livery might in fact incorporate the Old Solomani Arms into the Imperial Livery in some way ("Ancient Pedigree of the Family, don't you know . . .").


My point is simply that I think the old "Individual Achievement of Arms" passed down to an individual heir as a possession would be improved upon, especially in light of the other influencing cultures (including Solomani - both European and non-European), Vilani, Sylean, etc.) that made up the nascent Imperial aristocracy.

YMMV of course.
 
Regulated, in the sense that you can claim specific devices or patterns that can be displayed, whether through family, profession, or achievement.

Or, a higher authority can grant you a device or pattern, that you would not be qualified for.
 
I've had this discussion elsewhere and elsewhen; of a certainty, "Da Roolz" will change based on cultural factors, and in the case of nonhumans, physiology might (will) come into play. What that particular thread decided was that the Rule of Tincture was really a way of saying "Any two adjacent regions of the picture resulting from the description must have high contrast". Thus, if the perception is that cramoisi and noir have high contrast, it becomes perfectly permissible to place bright red against black.

Another principle that was solidly followed in the early days of heraldry, but was somewhat abated as more people became entitled to bear a coat of arms, was best summed up in three words in modern English: big, bold, butch. This generally was interpreted to mean that objects or groups of objects should be as large as possible to fill the available space, and be easily recognizable without relying on fiddly details.

Heraldry is indeed in origin personal; but not only does it identify the rightful bearer, it also evolved into an identification of relationships - that is, the heir bore the same arms, but with a label across; the second son used a crescent instead of the label; the third used a molet (five-pointed star), and so on. Marriage between two armigers was indicated by placing both arms side-by-side on a single shield; the heir to both would divide teh shield in quarters, with the upper left and lower right (as you look at it) being Daddy, and the upper right and lower left being Mommy. "Quarterings" can get complex; the arms of Reginald Cecil Lybbe Powys-Lybbe incorporates no fewer than 64 distinct "quarters", and I remember encountering (in a book about heraldry) an example wherein were displayed 368 "quarters".

(Scots heraldry indicates cadency through a system of prescribed bordures.)

(Incidentally, the vocabulary of Anglo-Irish and Scots heraldry isn't derived from modern French; but from Norman French, a much older form. This is why red is Gules rather than rouge, cramoisi, or some other word for a bright shade of red.)
 
(Incidentally, the vocabulary of Anglo-Irish and Scots heraldry isn't derived from modern French; but from Norman French, a much older form. This is why red is Gules rather than rouge, cramoisi, or some other word for a bright shade of red.)
Yeah, the clerks who were recording things when heraldry started in England wrote in Norman French. You didn't write anything official in English! What kind of barbarian would do that?!?:D

Again, in heraldry, the achievement isn't the graphic — it's the description. So, unless the shape of the escutcheon is specified in the achievement, it could be absolutely anything. Historically, women who achieved arms were given a lozenge, while clergy used a shape called the cartouche, in both cases because a martial shield was considered inappropriate. As a result, I expect the merging of the Solomani heralds with the Vilani Amkadash Akir (“Keepers of the Sigils”) just resulted in different graphical elements with a few new inclusions.

Objects on the shield are called charges, and there's a bewildering variety, in a variety of categories. My feeling is the Vilani went more with abstract, traditional shapes, which could easily have been added by the Solomani to their heraldic rules. Many could already have been described by the language of heraldry.
 
Incidentally, everybody who achieves SOC A+ in Traveller gets inducted into one of the Orders of Imperial Knighthood; one of the "benefits" traditionally is that you may design an achievement. I imagine some people who get knighted already have a design in mind, while others might not bother doing their design for years. But that's your job security for heralds — all those guys getting "+1 SOC" and reaching A+!
 
the_flintstones_fred_barney_water_buffaloes_poster-r48081eae817344239fea461d64f428eb_wvk_8byvr_644.webp


One benefit is headgear.
 
Incidentally, everybody who achieves SOC A+ in Traveller gets inducted into one of the Orders of Imperial Knighthood; one of the "benefits" traditionally is that you may design an achievement. I imagine some people who get knighted already have a design in mind, while others might not bother doing their design for years. But that's your job security for heralds — all those guys getting "+1 SOC" and reaching A+!
Soc B is the knighthood; Soc A might be those who aren't knighted but are recognized as worthy of being armigers.
 
More correctly,
"Azure, a Roundel above a Crescent Pendent Or"

Mentioning "or" twice is incorrect, and all Ordinaries and tinctures should be capitalized :D
Even more correctly, ...a Bezant above a Crescent Or; each different roundel had its own name. "Pendant" is unnecessary; the crescent in the Water Buffalo orientation (points upward) is its default. Points to the viewer's left, "Increscent", points to the viewer's right, "Decrescent", points down, "Crescent inverted".

It should be noted that the terms dexter and sinister in heraldry refer to the bearer's right and left respectively; they reverse from the viewer's vantage - that is, the lions on His Britannic Majesty's arms are facing dexter, or to the viewer's left. For animals, the default orientation is always to dexter (the viewer's left); if facing to the viewer's right, it must be specifically noted so - "a lion counter-rampant" or "a lion rampant to sinister".

The Water Buffalos of The Flintstones weren't in any way associated with nobility or orders of knighthood; it was more intended as a spoof on the various ritual and fraternal lodges that arose from Masonry. Modern real-world equivalents are such groups as the Lions, Elks, Odd Fellows, (indirectly) Rotary, and so on.

I spent a lot of years as a herald in the SCA - Golden Tygre Pursuivant, Northpass, East, and Seahorse Pursuivant, Østgarðr, East.
 


Considering that Mason membership guaranteed professional success, and judicial immunity.

It's better than a knighthood.
Well, at one time, yes - although being known to be a Mason has been a good way to be on the outs with the [Catholic] Church since at least 1738, and possibly even before that (unofficially). I don't think they actively excommunicate (or declare Anathema) Masons any more, but Masons are prohibited from taking Communion (and this was reinforced by a Papal statement in 1983). I don't believe that the prohibition extends to fraternal lodges (like the Elks, Lions, or Odd Fellows), but it definitely applies to all Rites and ritual Lodges that call themselves Masons or Freemasons.

The relationship between various national Orthodox Churches and Masonry is ... unclear. Currently, the Russian Orthodox Church has a patriarchal encyclical against it, forbidding Communion to Masons; other national Orthodox Churches may or may not - several countries in Eastern Europe are largely Orthodox, and while the relationship between Masonry and Orthodoxy isn't well defined, it is acknowledged that Masonry played a significant role in their national independence movements, although there is some consideration that Masonry and [Orthodox] Christianity may be incompatible in the way that the Russian Patriarchate and the Pope have asserted. National politics plays a role in this; if the secular government of a state bans Masonry, the Orthodox Church of that state generally will follow.

The Anglican Synod of 1987 concluded that Masonry is "heretical and blasphemous".

I haven't been able to find out about the relationship between e.g. Coptic Christianity and Masonry.
 
Back
Top