Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Welcome to the new COTI server. We've moved the Citizens to a new server. Please let us know in the COTI Website issue forum if you find any problems.
We, the systems administration staff, apologize for this unexpected outage of the boards. We have resolved the root cause of the problem and there should be no further disruptions.
At some point, when robots are fighting robots, what will be the point? I read something somewhere recently that seems somewhat relevant now; the author basically stated that the development of "warbots" may actually increase the use of violence as a tool of statecraft since Pentagon officials won't have to contend with the sight of flag drapped caskets being shown on CNN. Although I'm all for saving human and specifically soldiers' lives, I do see his point.
The "cleaner", and more "sanitized" you make war, the less hellish it becomes... and thus incites less public opposition.
The more disconnected the public becomes from the soldiers doing the fighting, the more disinterested the public becomes in both the military and the wars being fought.
If war can be shifted to nearly entirely machine vs machine, with few or no human casualties, then the public won't care whether a war is being waged or not (except as it affects their tax levels & consumer goods availability).
Therefore, war would become the normal means of settling disputes, replacing diplomacy entirely.