there's no requirement to participate in any thread... unless you're a player in a PBP... and that's twixt you and the GM.However, I will recuse myself from the argument, as having nothing good to say about AI, I will say nothing at all.
there's no requirement to participate in any thread... unless you're a player in a PBP... and that's twixt you and the GM.However, I will recuse myself from the argument, as having nothing good to say about AI, I will say nothing at all.
That change came about with the monetization rules change in YT. One country in particular was gaming the system on short form video and farming google for cash.There's clearly some YT algorithm thing forcing all of videos to be around 20m long.
Thankfully, I can just hand the page off to the AI to summarize its transcript.
The way I think about this is more in terms of ... Star Trek ... or Dune.At the 2 extremes I see Star Trek's utopia of a post-scarcity society, or a more Judge Dread reality where a few at the top have everything, and everyone else has nothing. It will be in the middle somewhere of those extremes. I'm Team Star Trek BTW, but I also sort of understand human nature, so I have concerns.
The way I think about this is more in terms of ... Star Trek ... or Dune.
And currently, the path we are on in trending more on the trajectory towards ... DUNE.
As far as warnings from SciFi, I honestly think that The Orville (of all things) handled it best.
There has long been a "chicken vs egg" question regarding the cause & effect of replicator (type) technologies, like we see in Star Trek.
The answer from The Orville is not the usual one ... and not just because of the Prime Directive style angle on the argument (and context in which it is made in the S3E10 episode, Future Unknown in which the scene happens).
- Does the replicator (elimination of scarcity) produce the utopian society?
- Does the utopian society produce the replicator?
The Orville makes the case that "replicator tech levels" are a BYPRODUCT of a society that has reached utopia. You have to have the utopia FIRST before the culture can responsibly handle the transition into a post-scarcity world view. If the culture hasn't "developed enough" to handle the transition ... the results could potentially be extinction level for civilization.
Point being, you don't just need "the tools" of technology ... you need to have the WISDOM to use those "tools" of technology RESPONSIBLY.
And in the Real World™ ... that wisdom is sure looking like the rarest of resources out of all of them, while greed (is good?) and rampant one-upmanship (dressed up as "competition") rules the day.
Like the saying goes ... common sense sure is in short supply these days ...![]()
they already are. someone created an AI only social network to see what would happen. See https://www.moltbook.com/You could allow the bots to argue with each other.
![]()
Except, that still would use up enormous computing resources, with consequences for the power grid and water availability.
There is a line about that in Starship Troopers, one of the teachers moral philosophy lectures on survival no less.Speaking of dead:
In May 2026, Osbourne's wife and son announced plans for an artificial intelligence-powered avatar of him, which could appear in concerts, films and adverts.[299]
You could have avatars of the deceased arguing with each other.
This seems like the core of the discussion on the thread. It's easier to misuse technology than it is to survive misused technology.The way I think about this is more in terms of ... Star Trek ... or Dune.
And currently, the path we are on in trending more on the trajectory towards ... DUNE.
As far as warnings from SciFi, I honestly think that The Orville (of all things) handled it best.
There has long been a "chicken vs egg" question regarding the cause & effect of replicator (type) technologies, like we see in Star Trek.
The answer from The Orville is not the usual one ... and not just because of the Prime Directive style angle on the argument (and context in which it is made in the S3E10 episode, Future Unknown in which the scene happens).
- Does the replicator (elimination of scarcity) produce the utopian society?
- Does the utopian society produce the replicator?
The Orville makes the case that "replicator tech levels" are a BYPRODUCT of a society that has reached utopia. You have to have the utopia FIRST before the culture can responsibly handle the transition into a post-scarcity world view. If the culture hasn't "developed enough" to handle the transition ... the results could potentially be extinction level for civilization.
Point being, you don't just need "the tools" of technology ... you need to have the WISDOM to use those "tools" of technology RESPONSIBLY.
And in the Real World™ ... that wisdom is sure looking like the rarest of resources out of all of them, while greed (is good?) and rampant one-upmanship (dressed up as "competition") rules the day.
Like the saying goes ... common sense sure is in short supply these days ...![]()
Hammers are wonderful tools.It's easier to misuse technology than it is to survive misused technology.
Did you get to the end of the Internet?Dead Internet Theory has been around for awhile now.
If you've read any of Julian May's Pliocene or Milieu books, there's a concept of algetics - that pain can be a teacher.This thread has reached a point for me where reading it is Painfulness = Informative = Interesting.
Wasn't there a batch of aliens in (2300, I think?) that got smarter when you (or their leaders) hit them?Did you get to the end of the Internet?
If you've read any of Julian May's Pliocene or Milieu books, there's a concept of algesics - that pain can be a teacher.
The Kafers get smarter when their equivalent of adrenaline surges. Thus if they perceive a threat, they get smart - hit them, point a gun at them, be an alien in their presence, it all works. And the more it happens, the higher their 'resting' intelligence, so their society encourages a high level of (non-lethal) interpersonal violence. Also, to learn something they need to be aroused, so leaders and teacher hit their charges before giving instruction or orders.Wasn't there a batch of aliens in (2300, I think?) that got smarter when you (or their leaders) hit them?
Did you get to the end of the Internet?
If you've read any of Julian May's Pliocene or Milieu books, there's a concept of algesics - that pain can be a teacher.
Just trying to imagine the elementary school teachers "beating the stupid" out of their students.And the more it happens, the higher their 'resting' intelligence, so their society encourages a high level of (non-lethal) interpersonal violence. Also, to learn something they need to be aroused, so leaders and teacher hit their charges before giving instruction or orders.
Pain tells you that you are still alive, and maybe you are doing something wrong.Did you get to the end of the Internet?
If you've read any of Julian May's Pliocene or Milieu books, there's a concept of algesics - that pain can be a teacher.
That's known as "Positive Reinforcement". /sJust trying to imagine the elementary school teachers "beating the stupid" out of their students.
algetics (al-JEH-tix).
1. The study of pain, especially as it applies to the achievement of metapsychic operancy.
2. The punishment circuits of the docilator (q.v.).
For fun and games, imagine being a captive of the Kafers. For no reason, every time they want you to do something they beat you before they even tell you what they want, let alone waiting to see if you disobey. Every time.Just trying to imagine the elementary school teachers "beating the stupid" out of their students.