• Welcome to the new COTI server. We've moved the Citizens to a new server. Please let us know in the COTI Website issue forum if you find any problems.
  • We, the systems administration staff, apologize for this unexpected outage of the boards. We have resolved the root cause of the problem and there should be no further disruptions.

Applying Fame to Interstellar Corporations

robject

SOC-14 10K
Admin Award
Marquis
A long while back I had been thinking about interstellar corporations. I had some back-and-forth discussions with Hans about (for example) how much business Oberlindes did, and how many ships it had before and after the Fifth Frontier War.

Both of those "statistics" could be abstracted into Fame. This is wondering aloud, but it seems very useful for first-order of approximation - which is all you usually need for this sort of thing.

Plus, by boiling it all down to a Fame metric, we also get a Target Number, handy for "dealing with" large corporations on a local level.

So instead of trying to figure out how many ships Oberlindes/Al Morai/etc has, then trying to figure out how much money Oberlindes/Al Morai/etc makes per <period of time on particular routes>, just map their interstellar reach to Fame.

Oberlindes is an interface/subsector line. I place its Fame as "Subsector" = 19.
Al Morai is a Sector Line, so Fame = 20.
Tukera has Imperial reach, so Fame = 24.
Akerut, a subsidiary of Tukera, has Sector scope, so Fame = 20.


One observation I make is that there's not much of a difference between Fame 19 and Fame 20 as a Target Number.

I could interpret that in one of two ways. One, Fame needs a value inserted between. Or two, there's not much operationally different between a subsector line and a sector line, even if there may be an order-of-magnitude difference in value or size.


Another nice thing about using Fame in this way is that I don't have to think about numbers of ships and megacredits earned. The single asset that bundles up a company's economic leverage is Fame, and the company can be compared to other companies with that value.
 
Last edited:
If I were to suggest an errata for Fame, it would be to give interstellar corporations a little more wiggle room here.

I'd remove "Inner System" and shift things up one.
I'd change "Two Systems" to "A Few Systems".
Then after "Subsector" I'd insert "Two Subsectors".

Maybe.
 
Now how to rationalize Fame applying to large corps.

Oberlindes is a 19.
Akerut is a 20.
Al Moral is a 20.
Tukera is a 24.[FONT=arial,helvetica]

[/FONT]A "17" ("Two Systems" = 2 worlds) has to have a few ships (two to five, say). This is exactly the definition of a Fledgling line.

So say an "18" ("Many Systems" = 12 plus or minus) needs ten ships at least.

A "19" ("Subsector" = 40 worlds) needs many tens of ships.

A "20" ("Sector" = 500 worlds) would need many hundreds of ships. Call it some number less than a thousand ships.

A "21" ("Domain" = 2,000 worlds) and a "22" (Domains) would need thousands of ships.

A "23" ("Many Domains") and "24" (Empire) would need tens of thousands of ships.

This doesn't cleanly map to an order of magnitude. The equation is a little messy.

But "number of worlds served" does map nicely to "number of ships" in a very approximate way.
 
If I were to suggest an errata for Fame, it would be to give interstellar corporations a little more wiggle room here.

I'd remove "Inner System" and shift things up one.
I'd change "Two Systems" to "A Few Systems".
Then after "Subsector" I'd insert "Two Subsectors".

Maybe.

What about, instead of two subsectors, a quadrant. Four subsectors.

I recall that being the next level of mapping, but have no idea of how canonical it is.
 
What about, instead of two subsectors, a quadrant. Four subsectors.

I recall that being the next level of mapping, but have no idea of how canonical it is.


IIRC, the TNE:1248 & Gateway to Destiny material by MJD used both Octants (2 Subsectors) and Quadrants (4 Subsectors) as subdivisions of Sectors.
 
I believe they were only on the TNE:1248 material.

Must have skimmed over it then, since I do have 1248: Out of the Darkness.


Actually, my mistake. I checked and octants are in MgT Core Book 3 - Scouts, p.97:

MgT Core Book 3 - Scouts, p.97:
Quadrants and Octants are semi-official charting designations comprising
(respectively) four and two subsectors, used by trade and popular media,
and the names given often vary from the standard subsectors defined in
the IGS Precise Ephemeris.
 
If there's nothing hard & fast in canon could the divisions be local conventions rather than formal TI or equivalent geographical or organisational entities?
 
Back
Top