Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Welcome to the new COTI server. We've moved the Citizens to a new server. Please let us know in the COTI Website issue forum if you find any problems.
We, the systems administration staff, apologize for this unexpected outage of the boards. We have resolved the root cause of the problem and there should be no further disruptions.
There's a few others that didn't make the list. I think one is a gas giant that orbits its sun every few days. And allegedly water worlds may be somewhat common. Cool stuff if we ever make it to the stars.
Looks to me like it started to form as a binary, but something disrupted its accretion (perhaps stellar ignition?) just below degeneracy starts fusion. (And wasn't 10 Jovian Masses the supposed upper limit for planets?
Looks to me like it started to form as a binary, but something disrupted its accretion (perhaps stellar ignition?) just below degeneracy starts fusion. (And wasn't 10 Jovian Masses the supposed upper limit for planets?
I believe 13 Jovian Masses is the upper-limit for Jovian Worlds vs the smallest Brown Dwarfs. But there seem to be some verified exceptions to this calculated value, so there is still uncertainty.
I believe 13 Jovian Masses is the upper-limit for Jovian Worlds vs the smallest Brown Dwarfs. But there seem to be some verified exceptions to this calculated value, so there is still uncertainty.
Yes, the upper limit is generally accepted to be around 13 Jupiter Masses for a substellar body in a star system, although that's not an ironclad definition. Generally speaking, though, if it orbits a star and it's too small to fuse deuterium, it's a planet.
If it's off wandering the galaxy on its own, however, then it's not a planet, even if it's too small to keep the pilot light on. The most accepted term for those objects right now is 'sub-brown dwarf' -- at least if it's non-terrestrial.