Traveller Store CotI Features New Posts Mark Forums Read Register


Go Back TravellerRPG.com > Citizens of the Imperium > Twilight:2000 > TWILIGHT: 2000 1E/2E

TWILIGHT: 2000 1E/2E Discussion of the Twilight: 2000 from GDW.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 21st, 2002, 12:58 PM
trader jim's Avatar
trader jim trader jim is offline
Citizen: SOC-14
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Pacific Coast, California
Posts: 3,448
Gallery : 0
trader jim Citizen
Question

what is the twilight 2000 combat system like??
is it RPG or miniatures or bothe or what?? the system sounds interesting - although maby out of date but still usable.
__________________
Whatta you mean, my accounts empty??
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old August 23rd, 2002, 11:49 AM
Uncle Bob Uncle Bob is offline
Citizen: SOC-14
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,914
Gallery : 0
Uncle Bob Citizen
Post

It has been ten years since I played it, and I can't find my books, so don't hold me to details, but...

I never used it with miniatures, but strictly as a roleplaying system. In fact, after the collapse of the Soviet Block Murph used the rules for a home brew espionage/Cthulu game we called "Twilight 1990".

Murph eventually switched to Cyberpunk rules, but I still consider (the original, not the later House) TW2000 rules to be the finest contemporary combat system on the market. As for being dated, some small changes would have to be made to the weapons lists (Russian thermobaric weapons, AT-4s instead of LAWs, no CAWS (*sniff*), etc) but less than you'd think. Very hard to munchkin, too.

Of course, being contemporary military combat there are guns, guns, guns, and more GUNS. [img]graemlins/file_22.gif[/img]
__________________
Rule #35 - "That which does not kill you has made a tactical error" From The Seven Habits of Highly Effective Pirates
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old August 23rd, 2002, 12:49 PM
vegascat's Avatar
vegascat vegascat is offline
Citizen: SOC-13
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 938
Gallery : 0
vegascat Citizen
Post

I did a couple of years of T2000 as a GM. The combat system was quite detailed, but led to Rambo syndrome. I had guys hit 10 or more time each still effective by the rules. Of course some did die, but not too many.
Game ended by a Darwin suicide. They tried to hijack a fuel convoy to get gas for their M1. They hid in a ditch beside a road ready for the convoy. A guy opened fire with a LAW at the lead APC. Missed so bad he hit the tanker right beside the ditch, bursting it. No one survived the flaming fuel that filled the ditch as they tried to get out. [img]graemlins/toast.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/toast.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/toast.gif[/img]
As I recall, it was a percentile based system. don't have the books with me, or I would check for you.
Vehicle damage system was great, weapons were quite detailed and armor worked to. Other than the Rambo Syndrome, it was a usable system.
__________________
The two things we all have in common, we are born of woman, and we will all inevitably die.
Some will have the honor to stand on the line falling while protecting kin and country instead of passing in bed, a pain riddled decayed old husk.
To dare is to live. To dare great things is to be remembered. In the end, Murphy will rule.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old August 23rd, 2002, 12:55 PM
vegascat's Avatar
vegascat vegascat is offline
Citizen: SOC-13
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 938
Gallery : 0
vegascat Citizen
Post

To answer your question, it is a RPG combat system that can use minatures. To use it for a minatures battle, you would find it excessively detailed in the damage tables. The Rambo syndrome again kicks in. When you hit, you rolled damage, number of die depending on the weapon. The armor subtracted from the damage, then each vehicle system hit subtracted some more. You could easily hit a tank, penatrate, and not hurt anyone inside, other than fragging the radio and other nonessentials. It was a bit unrealistic that way.
__________________
The two things we all have in common, we are born of woman, and we will all inevitably die.
Some will have the honor to stand on the line falling while protecting kin and country instead of passing in bed, a pain riddled decayed old husk.
To dare is to live. To dare great things is to be remembered. In the end, Murphy will rule.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old August 23rd, 2002, 02:00 PM
Herodotus Herodotus is offline
Citizen: SOC-8
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Minot, ND, USA
Posts: 37
Gallery : 0
Herodotus Citizen
Post

If you've ever palyed Traveller, The New Era You've used the same combat system as Twilight: 2000 . It was the rule system that GDW had been using as their house rules at the end.
I did come up with a way to reduce the "Rambo effect". I changed the damage dice form six siders to ten siders. I also made the dice rolls "Open ended". By that I mean, if any of the dice that were rolled where a 10, you got to reroll that (or those) die (dice) again and add them to the total damage. If any of the rerolled dice where tens, you got to roll them again! And so one, and so on. It still takes many more hits then is resonable to kill someone, but it cuts down on the mad charges on the heavy machinegun positions. For a more realistic campagin I cut down the number of hit points of a given wound level.
__________________
Friends may come, and friends may go, but enemies accumulate
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old August 23rd, 2002, 07:58 PM
Uncle Bob Uncle Bob is offline
Citizen: SOC-14
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,914
Gallery : 0
Uncle Bob Citizen
Post

Twilight 2000 2nd edition was the first set of rules corrupted into the awful "house system." I know a lot of players think that was the Twilight 2000.

Under 1st Edition rules we didn't have a problem with the Rambo syndrome. Did anyone else?
__________________
Rule #35 - "That which does not kill you has made a tactical error" From The Seven Habits of Highly Effective Pirates
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old August 23rd, 2002, 08:30 PM
Herodotus Herodotus is offline
Citizen: SOC-8
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Minot, ND, USA
Posts: 37
Gallery : 0
Herodotus Citizen
Post

Actually I did play the first addition rules. I much prefured their vehical rules to the second edition. But the first adition where just about as vunerable to the "Rambo Effect" if you ran them as writen. Character's could take a huge number of hits before it really started to slow them down. I did modafie them so that your hit points for an area were all your hit points for that area. Also the "three shot" ammo rules were annoying. You are in a low ammo supply environment, yet you can't take a shot that uses less than three rounds of ammo? A good sniper would just cringe at that rule.
I actually prefured the second addition rules for most things. I like games where stats make a real difference. In the first rules, due to the way characters were created, the worse the stats, the better the character.
I think I would have liked to see something half way between the first and second addition rules
__________________
Friends may come, and friends may go, but enemies accumulate
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old August 24th, 2002, 12:23 PM
Herodotus Herodotus is offline
Citizen: SOC-8
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Minot, ND, USA
Posts: 37
Gallery : 0
Herodotus Citizen
Talking

You'll have to pardon the spelling and grammar in the previous post. My spelling and grammar are poor, at best. under normal circumstances. I tried to write that last post while being involved in two different chats on-line and talking to someone in the room with me, all at the same time. Not a good idea for me . I actually hit "Add Reply" instead of "Preview Post". Also not a good thing for me to do [img]smile.gif[/img] .

I would also like to mention that I liked the history for the setting in the first edition much better than any of the versions they came out with in later editions. I actually kept the orginal story regardless of which version of T2K I was running . Unfortunetly, someone walked off with my first edition or T2K and I no longer have that. If any one knows where I could find a copy of the history for first edition I would be very greatful! [img]graemlins/omega.gif[/img]
__________________
Friends may come, and friends may go, but enemies accumulate
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old August 24th, 2002, 03:44 PM
Uncle Bob Uncle Bob is offline
Citizen: SOC-14
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,914
Gallery : 0
Uncle Bob Citizen
Post

The three-round fire rules bothered me at first, but some combat veterans eventually convinced me that it came pretty close to how fire-arms combat actually happens. Even if you are worrying about ammo you'll keep squeezing if you have a target.

There does need to be a seperate set of sniper rules, but it makes far more sense to make the basic rules cover the other 90% of combat and combatants.

I need to dig out my rules and notes and see why didn't have Rambo problems. However, most small arms wounds are not immediately lethal or even disabling. This is a lesson every deer hunter learns and the US Army is relearning in Afghanistan. Of course, if you let them shoot holes in you you may die tommorrow or next week, and you certainly won't be any good to the party.
__________________
Rule #35 - "That which does not kill you has made a tactical error" From The Seven Habits of Highly Effective Pirates
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old August 27th, 2002, 08:41 PM
Clay r bush Clay r bush is offline
Citizen: SOC-4
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Limon, CO
Posts: 7
Gallery : 0
Clay r bush Citizen
Post

Re: Rambo effect
[img]smile.gif[/img]
DARK CONSPIRACY carried forward the house system. The second, post-GDW edition revised the hit point formulas. It roughly halved the number of hit points

I used this modification when I ran several adventures at GenCons. I ran several mercenary T2K adventures set in the real world, without a WWIII. I also ran a series of STARGATE adventures, and a handful of actual DARK CONSPIRACY adventures. The modification did improve the game.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

This website and its contents are copyright ©2010- Far Future Enterprises. All rights reserved. Traveller is a registered trademark of Far Future Enterprises .
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright (c) 2010-2013, Far Future Enterprises. All Rights Reserved.