Traveller Store CotI Features New Posts Mark Forums Read Register


Go Back TravellerRPG.com > Citizens of the Imperium > General Traveller Discussions > In My Traveller Universe

In My Traveller Universe Detail what parts of Traveller you do (or don't) use in your campaign.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 6th, 2010, 05:20 PM
Tellon Tellon is offline
Citizen: SOC-12
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Twin Cities
Posts: 296
Gallery : 0
Tellon Citizen
Send a message via AIM to Tellon Send a message via Yahoo to Tellon
Default Ion/MPD/NTR Thrusters question ..

Now with HT and the chart for the basically correct level of thrust for LF and SF rockets --

same generally with the Resistoject., Archjet, Ion and MPD --

BUT

FOr low tech societies -- say Sol III circa 2010 -- they are making those thrusters even better as time goes on.

The Russians have been working on and perfecting Hall type (ion drives) since the 60's, while the US worked on grid style Ion drives -- so 2 styles that come up with the same thing ... and worked on for basically 50 years.

So the ESA and Russia is still working on MPD's and making thrusters like VASIMIR viable for interplanetary exploration -- say to Venus or Mars --

So -- like any good Thruster chart -- when I look at the thrusters -- I can readily see that Resistojet and Archjet are strictly for station-keeping (Micro-Newtons of thrust) instead of Newtons (as the unit) like we see in Chem-rockets. BUT we are seeing no increases and advancements in technology in HT? ..

So instance -- say Fusion Rockets are just too heavy with machinery and thrust requiremenst to make them viable in TL 8 and so sattillites are using more and more MPD's and Ion/archjets for propulsion -- as even NTR's are making news again..

hmmm -- kinda like our situation now on this rock we all call home .. lol

So then we see the tables in HT -- look over Ion drives -- and their use for the last 50 years and know the Russian/US developments have made them better -- so we should see some nice new Ion drives in TL 8 and even 9

Same thing with MPD -- it too should be advanced with a TL 9 advancement -- So for low-tech societies -- say TL 7 - 9, there are lots of tweaks one should see -- but I guess it was missed for some odd reason ...

And you migth say -- NTR? -- are you serious? .. of course -- they have been still considered, designed, talked of for space-testing -- as we know of Gas-Core NTR's (we can even read about the variuous versions on Wkipedia)

--

Now when I look at ISP's and thrust vs F.cons -- there are several factors why people know and shake their heads at why the Thrusters in TNE are broken and why people fall back "somewhat" onto the TT figures in HT

so do I fure a Fusion rocket will be made and successful tested in the nest 90 years (the era we call TL 9) .. yes -- But since this is technically TL 9 era -- we still dont have a Fusion rocket -- so we have to fall back on older tech that has been worked on quite successfuly for decades now .. lol

--

So question: What if any "improvements" have you guys made on the Ion & MPD drives & NTR drives that we see on HT and in peoples tweaks and sadly not in TNE ...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Alternate Thrusters/Maneuver Drives & Antigravity John Snead Imperial Research Station 7 February 14th, 2010 05:02 PM
Selfcontained Thrusters in FF&S1 Zparkz Traveller: The New Era 2 December 12th, 2004 07:09 PM

This website and its contents are copyright ©2010-2013 Far Future Enterprises. All rights reserved. Traveller is a registered trademark of Far Future Enterprises .
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright (c) 2010-2013, Far Future Enterprises. All Rights Reserved.