MegaTraveller Discuss of the MegaTraveller ruleset and the Rebellion Milieu |

March 2nd, 2007, 02:01 PM
|
 |
Absent Friend
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Saint Joseph
Posts: 3,314
Gallery :
0
|
|
The second volume is correct, I thought I'd fixed that. Sigh...
The frozen watch is broken into the same crew sections as the crew is, hence 75x4. A standard frozen watch would be one crew section (75); however, the original Regal design from TCS has a complete replacement crew, so in reality, there are four crew sections waiting to be unthawed.
And the total crew is really 313; I've made a few slight changes here and there (and replaced the small staterooms with real staterooms since there is room).
So, let me see if I can post version 2.01 tonight...
__________________
"I like Scouts, Scouts like me, we're just one big fam.... ARGGH!"
Don the Big Purple Traveller Dinosaur
Moderator of the ct-starships mailing list
Official Traveller Errata Collector (CT/MT/TNE/T4/T20/MGT/T5)
Official Archivist of Digest Group Publications
T5 Forum Hall Monitor and FFE Minion
|

March 2nd, 2007, 02:50 PM
|
Citizen: SOC-1
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Sheffield, UK
Posts: 4
Gallery :
0
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by DonM:
The frozen watch is broken into the same crew sections as the crew is, hence 75x4. A standard frozen watch would be one crew section (75); however, the original Regal design from TCS has a complete replacement crew, so in reality, there are four crew sections waiting to be unthawed.
|
Sorry, but this is still confusing me a little. The formula in Referee's Manual pg. 82 states that Frozen Watch is Total Crew, divided by Hull Displacement Tonnage divided by 1000. So in the case of the Regal, that would give a Frozen Watch of 4, which is the second stage in your calculation. I would have expected this to be the final Frozen Watch value, but you then multiply this by 75 to get a total Frozen Watch of 300.
Is this purely a design decision to fit with the original Regal, or is there something I am missing here ?
|

March 2nd, 2007, 02:50 PM
|
Citizen: SOC-1
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Sheffield, UK
Posts: 4
Gallery :
0
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by DonM:
The frozen watch is broken into the same crew sections as the crew is, hence 75x4. A standard frozen watch would be one crew section (75); however, the original Regal design from TCS has a complete replacement crew, so in reality, there are four crew sections waiting to be unthawed.
|
Sorry, but this is still confusing me a little. The formula in Referee's Manual pg. 82 states that Frozen Watch is Total Crew, divided by Hull Displacement Tonnage divided by 1000. So in the case of the Regal, that would give a Frozen Watch of 4, which is the second stage in your calculation. I would have expected this to be the final Frozen Watch value, but you then multiply this by 75 to get a total Frozen Watch of 300.
Is this purely a design decision to fit with the original Regal, or is there something I am missing here ?
|

March 2nd, 2007, 02:50 PM
|
Citizen: SOC-1
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Sheffield, UK
Posts: 4
Gallery :
0
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by DonM:
The frozen watch is broken into the same crew sections as the crew is, hence 75x4. A standard frozen watch would be one crew section (75); however, the original Regal design from TCS has a complete replacement crew, so in reality, there are four crew sections waiting to be unthawed.
|
Sorry, but this is still confusing me a little. The formula in Referee's Manual pg. 82 states that Frozen Watch is Total Crew, divided by Hull Displacement Tonnage divided by 1000. So in the case of the Regal, that would give a Frozen Watch of 4, which is the second stage in your calculation. I would have expected this to be the final Frozen Watch value, but you then multiply this by 75 to get a total Frozen Watch of 300.
Is this purely a design decision to fit with the original Regal, or is there something I am missing here ?
|

March 2nd, 2007, 10:10 PM
|
 |
Absent Friend
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Saint Joseph
Posts: 3,314
Gallery :
0
|
|
It's purely a design decision to fit with the original Regal. And it's not a great design to begin with.
I'm simply trying to fix the best example we have.
And v2.01 is now posted...
__________________
"I like Scouts, Scouts like me, we're just one big fam.... ARGGH!"
Don the Big Purple Traveller Dinosaur
Moderator of the ct-starships mailing list
Official Traveller Errata Collector (CT/MT/TNE/T4/T20/MGT/T5)
Official Archivist of Digest Group Publications
T5 Forum Hall Monitor and FFE Minion
|

March 2nd, 2007, 10:10 PM
|
 |
Absent Friend
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Saint Joseph
Posts: 3,314
Gallery :
0
|
|
It's purely a design decision to fit with the original Regal. And it's not a great design to begin with.
I'm simply trying to fix the best example we have.
And v2.01 is now posted...
__________________
"I like Scouts, Scouts like me, we're just one big fam.... ARGGH!"
Don the Big Purple Traveller Dinosaur
Moderator of the ct-starships mailing list
Official Traveller Errata Collector (CT/MT/TNE/T4/T20/MGT/T5)
Official Archivist of Digest Group Publications
T5 Forum Hall Monitor and FFE Minion
|

March 2nd, 2007, 10:10 PM
|
 |
Absent Friend
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Saint Joseph
Posts: 3,314
Gallery :
0
|
|
It's purely a design decision to fit with the original Regal. And it's not a great design to begin with.
I'm simply trying to fix the best example we have.
And v2.01 is now posted...
__________________
"I like Scouts, Scouts like me, we're just one big fam.... ARGGH!"
Don the Big Purple Traveller Dinosaur
Moderator of the ct-starships mailing list
Official Traveller Errata Collector (CT/MT/TNE/T4/T20/MGT/T5)
Official Archivist of Digest Group Publications
T5 Forum Hall Monitor and FFE Minion
|

March 14th, 2008, 10:11 AM
|
 |
Absent Friend
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Saint Joseph
Posts: 3,314
Gallery :
0
|
|
Posted version 2.02 of the Starship Design Example. Thanks for the errata catches!
__________________
"I like Scouts, Scouts like me, we're just one big fam.... ARGGH!"
Don the Big Purple Traveller Dinosaur
Moderator of the ct-starships mailing list
Official Traveller Errata Collector (CT/MT/TNE/T4/T20/MGT/T5)
Official Archivist of Digest Group Publications
T5 Forum Hall Monitor and FFE Minion
|

March 14th, 2008, 08:19 PM
|
 |
Citizen: SOC-12
|
|
|
|
New version of Errata Up
Don has posted version 2.14 of MT errata on his website.
|

March 17th, 2008, 09:31 AM
|
|
Dom whats up with the multiple posts?
__________________
Have Gun (and Coffee Juice). Will Travel.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|