Traveller Store CotI Features New Posts Mark Forums Read Register

Go Back > Citizens of the Imperium > General Traveller Discussions > Imperial Interstellar Scout Service

Imperial Interstellar Scout Service Details of the worlds of the Imperium (and beyond).

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old August 14th, 2017, 07:42 PM
robject's Avatar
robject robject is online now
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 13,591
Gallery : 9
Visit robject's Blog
robject has disabled reputation
Default Gvegh "Bare-Bones" Partial Grammar

This is a hypothetical grammar of the Vargr language "Gvegh" using ideas teased out of one half-page of DGP's Vilani & Vargr, plus filler based loosely on some of Alien Module 3's grammar of Arrghoun. I'll keep this page updated as I update the grammar.

This is not intended to be a comprehensive grammar. It is intended to be a partial grammar for the purposes of putting some simple sentences together in a reasonably consistent and understandable way.


It's SVO. How boring... but then, Vargr were intended to be an "introductory" alien race, aren't they?


"Adjectival" includes verbs being used as noun modifiers... I guess.

"TAGH" marks the beginning of an indirect object (and I suppose it could also be used to start a relative clause... wouldn't that be fun. But I won't spend time thinking about that right now).


Verbs are inflected for simple tense, negation, tense+aspect, and person (1,2,3, singular and plural). Simple tense (past, future) is a prefix. Negation, person and tense-aspect (perfective, imperfective, continuous, progressive) are suffixes.

The two different sets of tense affixes are a minor convenience: use the simple tense prefixes, unless you need a nuance. If you're trying to express something beyond "was" and "will", then use the tense+aspect suffixes.

The simple tense and person are indicators that Gvegh is related in some way to the archaic Arrghoun language. I'm not going to make Arrghoun a direct ancestor, however, regardless of what TD3 says.


Simple Past: sok-
Simple Future: khuz-

Negation: -aekh. Example: kva, allow; kvaekh, not allow.

Present Perfect: -okh
Past Perfect: -(n)ae
Present Imperfect: -(s)aez
Past Imperfect: -(s)aen
Continuous: -ruz
Progressive: -kfaz

1s: -tul
1p: -dhuez
2s: -thos
2p: -dos
3s: -thes
3p: -des

Examples using llanan, devour:

sokllananaekhtul. sok-llanan-aekh-tul. I did not devour [it].
llananaenduez. llanan-aen-duez. We had been devouring [it].

Verb enclitics express mood.

Conditional: khaz
Imperative: tsoe
Inferential: kfaz
Interrogative who: khou
Interrogative what: noek
Interrogative when: gon
Interrogative where: gha
Interrogative why: llez
Interrogative how: guek
Optative: saez
Tentative: ruz


Plurals are marked with a suffix -z (-rz with vowel-final nouns).

Possession is implied by placing the owned noun in front of the owning noun; if the ownership is a formal claim of authority (like an obligation or legal), the suffix -eg is added to the owning noun.

Abstract nouns can be made from verbs using the suffix -khin. Example: zou, to cultivate, zoukhin, culture. They can also be made via the suffix -adz. Example: kaenguerr, to be superior (verb); kaenguerradz, superiority (abstract noun). Usage of one over the other appears to be based on preference.

ku- is a collectivizer. Example: kuvargr, a pack of Vargr.

Reduplication abstracts a noun: "_X_ _X_" = "Any given _X_".


Oe We
Ue You-singular
Sue You-plural
A They-singular
Sa They-plural
Goll It-singular
Sagoll It-plural
Zoez That-previously-mentioned (see TAGH section)


Adverbs come before the verb. Adverbs can be created from verbs with the suffix -veng.


Adjectives come before the noun, as in English. Also like English, there's no agreement in number with the noun.

-a can be used when using a noun to modify another noun. Example: zersakh, rock; zersakha vargr, rock-like Vargr.


I think Tagh is the Gvegh word that marks the beginning of an auxiliary phrase, sort of how "that" is used sometimes in English. Indirect objects can be hung directly off of it, as can subordinate or relative clauses... but I don't have rules on how these clauses refer back to nouns in the sentence.

...except one: Zoez, which is a pronoun referring back to the object of the previous phrase.


Aekh            adj     Absence of -
Dzedzghoughz    n       Teeth
Gha?                    Where?
Ghakse          n       Toy
Gon?                    When?
Guek?                   How?
Gvegh           n       Gvegh language
Gvegh gvegh     n       Spoken words
Kaenguerr       v       to be Superior
Kaenguerradz    n       Racial superiority
Kfaeg           n       Gvegh person
Kfaegzoukhin    n       Gvegh cultural sphere; Charisma
Khou?                   Who?
Kuvargr         n       A pack of Vargr
Kva             v       to Allow
LLanan          v       to Devour
LLez?                   Why?
Noek?                   What?
Orez                   Four
Ou                     Five
Sa                     Two
Thes                   One
Thursuth        n       Death
Tourz           n       Sector
Uerul           n       Small one
Urs             n       Ear
Vak                    Three
Vargr           n       Vargr
Zersakh         n       Rock
Zhos            v       to Respect
Zhosveng        adv     Respectfully
Zou             v       to Cultivate; Nurture
Imperiallines magazine
My Helpful Stuff for Traveller5
IMTU tc+ t5++ 3i(+) au ls+ / OTU 44% an+ dt+ ge- j- jf+ n- pi+ pp+ tr+ tv- uwp+ xb+
Tools Link

Last edited by robject; August 16th, 2017 at 09:49 AM..
Reply With Quote

To see more of this thread, please login or register.


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Towards a Gvegh Grammar robject Imperial Interstellar Scout Service 9 August 15th, 2017 10:10 PM
Short story "Bones and Mortar" gammamutant The Cleon Memorial Library 10 February 5th, 2016 05:52 PM
Adapting "Pocket Empires" for "2300 AD" marginaleye 2300AD & 2320 19 December 4th, 2010 01:49 PM
Pentagon Plots Digital "Crystal Ball" to "See the Future" in Battle Andrew Boulton Imperial Research Station 27 December 30th, 2007 05:07 PM
"Rim of Fire" & "Interstellar Wars" for GT wanted! anders lager Duty Free Shop 1 October 11th, 2007 08:12 AM

This website and its contents are copyright ©2010-2013 Far Future Enterprises. All rights reserved. Traveller is a registered trademark of Far Future Enterprises .
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright (c) 2010-2013, Far Future Enterprises. All Rights Reserved.