Traveller Store CotI Features New Posts Mark Forums Read Register

Go Back > Citizens of the Imperium > Other Versions of Traveller > Traveller: The New Era

Traveller: The New Era Discussion on Traveller: The New Era

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old July 21st, 2010, 11:16 PM
Twist Twist is offline
Citizen: SOC-1
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3
Gallery : 0
Twist Citizen
Default Travel to 100 Diameters

I was looking at the time to travel to 100 planetary diameters chart in the TNE book, and it says it takes about 10 hours to travel to 100 diameters on a size 8 world (earth size), at a 1 g-hour burn.

Using ˝ gt2 to a distance of 100 diameters (12800 * 1000 * 100/4.9) ^.5 / 3600. I get like 4.5 hrs. Even if I assume they only accelerate half way there and decelerate the other half (the book says they accelerate the whole way) I get like 6.35 hrs. Maybe they were taking into the account the gravity of the world, but I though contra gravity was supposed to nullify that. So what am I missing.

Also does anyone else think it's weird trading ship would waste all that space on maneuver fuel when they can go to and from a rather large world with just 20 G-Turns. It seems to me, there would either be a thriving tug business, or there would be a common meeting place 100+ diameters out and solar sail barges or robotic barges operating at low g or some such would take the cargo the rest of the way (especially the low priority cargo)? I just can't see a merchant vessel spending 17-30% of his volume on maneuver drives. Anyway guess that's 2 questions.
Reply With Quote
Old July 21st, 2010, 11:52 PM
aramis's Avatar
aramis aramis is offline
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Anchorage, AK, USofA
Posts: 29,248
Gallery : 53
Visit aramis's Blog
aramis has disabled reputation
Send a message via ICQ to aramis Send a message via AIM to aramis Send a message via Yahoo to aramis

The TNE isn't doing a continuous burn; it's doing a 35 min or so initial burn, and a 25 min or so decell burn, and coasting the in between.

the D=0.5AT2, reparsed for T=√(2D/A) is for a continuous burn the whole trip.

That's the difference. Coasting for 7 hours at 18km/s
~ Aramis /trav
Smith & Wesson: The Original Point and Click interface!

Archduke of Sylea (CORE 2118)
Duke of the Third Imperium (SPIN 0534)
Count Terra (SOLO 1827)
Count Gorod (REFT 1302)
Count of the Third Imperium (SPIN 2232)
Viscount of Adabicci (SPIN 1824)
Marquis of the Solomani Rim (SOLO 0606)
Marquis of the Third Imperium (SPIN 2410)
Baron of the Third Imperium (SPIN 2231)
Knight of the Iridium Throne (CORE 1434)
Sir William Hostman (OLDE 0512)
Sir William Hostman (DAGU 0622)
Knight of Deneb (REFT 2239)
Knight of Deneb (Spin 2532)
SEH w/Diamonds for Extreme Heroism - Battle of Boughene
MCG - Battle of Boughene
TAS: William Hostman (CORR 2506)
TAS: Bearer (DAIB 1326)
IMTU ct+ tm++ tne tg-- tt+ tmo+ t4- t20+ to ru+ ge+ 3i+ c+ jt au ls pi+ ta he+ st+
Wil Hostman 0602 C539857-9 S A724
OTU: 95% 3i an+ au+ br- cpu± dt± f+ fs++ ge± ih- inf± j± jf+ jm+ jt+ ls- n= nc+ pi+ pp-- tp+ tr+ tv- vi-- xb+-
Unless there is bold red text, presume my posts to be my personal material only.
Reply With Quote
Old July 22nd, 2010, 02:55 AM
MR TEK's Avatar
MR TEK MR TEK is offline
Citizen: SOC-12
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 303
Gallery : 0
MR TEK Citizen
Default Falling into the (gravity) well...

Personally I always thought there would be a "commercial" high port past the 100D limit. At least the big routed freighters jump close to that platform, so time on their own fuel would be minuets at both ends.
By cutting at least 1/2 day travel time, and at least that much fuel and life support, they can shave the margins that much closer.

Of course I always envisioned that imperial guaranteed shipping rate only applied to the big scheduled commercial haulers, and gypsies of all sorts could charge a higher rate for transport.

That would explain why the 1 mil dt commercial haulers that HAVE TO BE THERE for commerce to be of any volume to occur have never been seen or discussed. The big haulers never come in-system far enough for any but the mega-corp crews to see.

Of course the other side is that there is a steady stream of in system haulers that shuttle back and forth to that far port, but cargo transiting the system really only stays in system for exactly the length of time it takes to refuel.

There are of course other economic repercussions, but I expect only the mega-corps have the resources, and permits to build and traffic through the far ports, so the only effect on players should be to explain why the megas can make a living and the independents have to work so hard to get by.

Assuming the express boats stop way out there, that also cuts half a day per jump from the express boat routes.

So a system with much commerce has a far port where the equivalent of long haul trucks stop long enough to fuel and transfer fuel, and the rest of us indies and feeder lines fall into the high port and have to climb back out to jump.

Last edited by MR TEK; July 22nd, 2010 at 02:58 AM..
Reply With Quote
Old July 22nd, 2010, 02:06 PM
Twist Twist is offline
Citizen: SOC-1
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3
Gallery : 0
Twist Citizen

I see what I did wrong, the burn is only for an hour.
Total time – t
Burn time – tb
Coast time – tc

If you ignore the distance traveled while accelerating the formula would be
t = 100D/a(tb). If you calculate that you get the number in the book.

So now were talking 2 G-turns out and 2 G-turns in. Now I'm really not sure why they are carrying all that maneuver fuel. The Free trader carries 280Kl of Jump fuel and 700 Kl of maneuver fuel. A G-turn for it is 12.5 Kl. So you could carry 8 G-turns for 100 Kl. What is the rest of the fuel for? Fighting pirates? You can't out-run or out-gun them anyway, so why not jump away, it's less fuel (I never really understood the pirate thing anyway, but thats another conversation). So 2 complete Jumps with 4 G-turns each and 20% extra jump fuel is only 685 Kl. I may change the fuel thing back to CT in my TNE campaign. Why would anyone ever fight a battle unless they wanted too, it takes less fuel to jump away; so either you dead in space, or you jump away.

But to get back to the formula, if you don't ignore the distance traveled while accelerating:

If the distance to travel is more than what is accomplished during the burn, the formula is the distance traveled during the burn = ˝at^2 and the distance traveled after the burn 100D – ˝at^2. The time traveled during the burn is of course an hour, and the time after the burn is
(100D – ˝a(tb)^2) / (a(tb)) = tc.
100D/a(tb) – ˝tb = tc
100*12800*1000 / (9.8*3600) –.5*3600 = tc (in sec)
100*12800*1000 / (9.8*3600*3600) - .5 = tc (in hrs)
128000/(9.8*36*36) - .5
tc = 9.58
tb + tc = 10.58

The errata says 10.14, which I think was an attempt to count the time accelerating. Course I may have done that part wrong.
Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
100 diameters limit Andrew Boulton The Fleet 3 June 4th, 2010 07:49 PM
Can a ship exit jump space inside 100 diameters? magmagmag The Fleet 13 July 14th, 2008 02:04 PM
FTL Travel VS Time Travel Chuck Anumia The Lone Star 18 March 17th, 2005 02:07 AM
100 Diameters of Stars??? Badbru Imperial Interstellar Scout Service 10 May 10th, 2004 08:02 PM
10 or 100 Diameters of a Black Hole? RainOfSteel The Fleet 15 October 17th, 2003 03:07 PM

This website and its contents are copyright ©2010- Far Future Enterprises. All rights reserved. Traveller is a registered trademark of Far Future Enterprises .
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright (c) 2010-2013, Far Future Enterprises. All Rights Reserved.