Traveller Store CotI Features New Posts Mark Forums Read Register

Go Back > Citizens of the Imperium > General Traveller Discussions > Imperial Research Station

Imperial Research Station A forum for discussing technology and related topics for use in the Traveller Universe

Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old February 18th, 2019, 11:20 AM
kilemall kilemall is offline
Citizen: SOC-14
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 4,785
Gallery : 0
kilemall Respected Citizenkilemall Respected Citizenkilemall Respected Citizenkilemall Respected Citizenkilemall Respected Citizenkilemall Respected Citizen

1970s machines, whether the very first personal computers or mainframes, took a few minutes to load programs especially if they were on some sort of tape media. Booting up also took a few minutes, and might be as slow as running through a card deck.

The swapping between active and 'storage' programs should be considered instant as that's really more like mulitple programs, all loaded per se but many 'swapped out' in virtual memory, ready to run the instant it's given enough resources to actually execute.

Of course this is about what the CT system was modeled on. I'd assume this is avionics or better grade machines (better be for millions of credits and risking the whole ship), so they likely have an instant-on capability, extensive self-diagnostics running on startup and doing internal resource swaps on error/damage detection.

Which gets to another point as to why they could be bulky and/or spread out, their damage resiliency.

By CT ship damage standards, the ship computer can largely shrug off damage that would cripple a Type A engineering section. By 7 hits it is a very flaky machine, but still serviceable whereas a smaller ACS would be dead in space and the larger ones painfully damaged.

HG doesn't really capture that, but the computers still take beatings that leaves weapons damaged and drives crippled.

So, a LOT of redundancy, distributed failover nodes, backup consoles etc. that take damage- and take space.

Also was reading an editorial from Grognard where Wiseman was answering the critics of the Big Machine by saying the large computer spec was also intended to cover crewing space for controlling the machine. So, that too, and the larger models may have 2 crew stations.

The 1990s mainframes I worked often did, and I saw earlier generation machines that had the computer equivalent of a flight engineer station, with direct external controls on the functioning of the machine. Even today mainframes will typically have hardware and a console that controls how the system boots with what resources separate from the control/execution main console.
YUMV- Your Universe May Vary.
YOMD- Your Opinion May Differ.
Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Computers/Cyberpunk 'Problem' in Traveller. Ref00000 In My Traveller Universe 99 May 12th, 2014 06:55 PM
Computers!!!! shadowdragon The Fleet 47 April 14th, 2008 10:58 AM
Designed computers Vs. Ships Computers Norinn T20 - Traveller for the D20 System 1 May 31st, 2004 12:05 AM
Computers TNE/CT Villien Traveller: The New Era 16 October 22nd, 2003 02:02 PM

This website and its contents are copyright ©2010- Far Future Enterprises. All rights reserved. Traveller is a registered trademark of Far Future Enterprises .
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright (c) 2010-2013, Far Future Enterprises. All Rights Reserved.