Traveller Store CotI Features New Posts Mark Forums Read Register


Go Back TravellerRPG.com > Citizens of the Imperium > General Traveller Discussions > Imperial Research Station

Imperial Research Station A forum for discussing technology and related topics for use in the Traveller Universe

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 15th, 2007, 07:55 PM
Brian Blank's Avatar
Brian Blank Brian Blank is offline
Citizen: SOC-11
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Melbourne ,Florida
Posts: 96
Gallery : 1
Visit Brian Blank's Blog
Brian Blank Citizen
Default Solid or Metastable Metallic Hydrogen as fuel

I was reading an article on Jupiter and they were talking about Solid Hydrogen Ice and Metallic Hydrogen. I got to thinking, with the gravitics and materials technology of the Imperium why not use Solid Hydrogen or Metallic Hydrogen for Starships instead of LHyd. Fuel Tankage would be smaller and more room would be available for drives, cargo, weapons etc.

Here are a couple of links to what I'm talking about.

http://www.halfbakery.com/idea/Metallic_20Hydrogen

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metallic_hydrogen
__________________
Kinght of the Iridium Throne - Core 3103 Garen B439568E
Knight of llelish-llelish 2336 Arni B73A78A
Baron Dinomn-Spinward Marches 1912 Dinomn B6746329
Maquis Mater - Daibei 1819 E7663008
SEH Battle of Louzy 4518th Lift Infantry Regiment
TAS Member - Solomani Rim 0809 Azun B576ABCB

"Overkill is Underrated" - Col. John " Hannibal" Smith
" I aim to Misbehave" - Capt. Malcolm Reynolds
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old September 15th, 2007, 08:12 PM
spank spank is offline
Citizen: SOC-12
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 370
Gallery : 0
spank Citizen
Default Solid/slush hydrogen

I posted an idea about this a while ago, here is a link to the thread.

http://www.travellerrpg.com/CotI/Dis...ead.php?t=3402
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old September 15th, 2007, 09:41 PM
atpollard's Avatar
atpollard atpollard is offline
Citizen: SOC-14
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Port Richey
Posts: 9,413
Gallery : 43
Visit atpollard's Blog
atpollard Awesomeatpollard Awesomeatpollard Awesomeatpollard Awesomeatpollard Awesomeatpollard Awesomeatpollard Awesomeatpollard Awesomeatpollard Awesomeatpollard Awesomeatpollard Awesome
Default

Do not overlook the consequences that 1 hit to "fuel" and the ship vaporizes in a really big boom.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old September 15th, 2007, 10:02 PM
Brian Blank's Avatar
Brian Blank Brian Blank is offline
Citizen: SOC-11
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Melbourne ,Florida
Posts: 96
Gallery : 1
Visit Brian Blank's Blog
Brian Blank Citizen
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by atpollard View Post
Do not overlook the consequences that 1 hit to "fuel" and the ship vaporizes in a really big boom.
Quote:
Originally Posted by spank View Post
I posted an idea about this a while ago, here is a link to the thread.

http://www.travellerrpg.com/CotI/Dis...ead.php?t=3402
Thanks for the link, Spank. Nice to see I'm on the same wavelength with someone. I'd completly forgotten about Slush Tankage.

AT, not sure you wouldn't get the same thing with LHyd on a standard ship. One good hit to the tanks and ....BOOM !!

I'm thinking maybe Pellets or Slugs of fuel as well. We are already postulating that you can have fuel purifiers that can seperate and liquify hydrogen on 100ton ships at TL12-13. Who knows what is possible at higher Tech Levels
__________________
Kinght of the Iridium Throne - Core 3103 Garen B439568E
Knight of llelish-llelish 2336 Arni B73A78A
Baron Dinomn-Spinward Marches 1912 Dinomn B6746329
Maquis Mater - Daibei 1819 E7663008
SEH Battle of Louzy 4518th Lift Infantry Regiment
TAS Member - Solomani Rim 0809 Azun B576ABCB

"Overkill is Underrated" - Col. John " Hannibal" Smith
" I aim to Misbehave" - Capt. Malcolm Reynolds
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old September 19th, 2007, 09:39 AM
Zembar Zembar is offline
Citizen: SOC-3
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 10
Gallery : 0
Zembar Citizen
Default

Doesn't said "boom" require oxygen?

If the hydrogen is used for fusion, there shouldn't be any need for oxygen. Also, why would anyone store oxygen and hydrogen in the same place? Sound like a very very bad idea.

-- Zembar
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old September 19th, 2007, 01:56 PM
atpollard's Avatar
atpollard atpollard is offline
Citizen: SOC-14
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Port Richey
Posts: 9,413
Gallery : 43
Visit atpollard's Blog
atpollard Awesomeatpollard Awesomeatpollard Awesomeatpollard Awesomeatpollard Awesomeatpollard Awesomeatpollard Awesomeatpollard Awesomeatpollard Awesomeatpollard Awesomeatpollard Awesome
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zembar View Post
Doesn't said "boom" require oxygen?

I am not an expert on metalic hydrogen, but I was under the impression that it is only 'sort of' stable and could easily be coaxed to expand back to a liquid or gaseous state. The sudden and violent increase in volume and pressure is the source of the 'boom'.

What happens when you suddenly have 100 dtons of fuel in a 1 dton tank?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old September 19th, 2007, 05:22 PM
Zembar Zembar is offline
Citizen: SOC-3
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 10
Gallery : 0
Zembar Citizen
Default

Any container capable of maintaining the pressures and temperatures needed would probably take a few hits, but I see your point. Even if according to the wikipedia article, it's actually only about nine times more dense than "standard hydrogen", which is admittedly about as loosely defined as you can get. (since lhyd is very roughly 1/700 as dense as hydrogen at 0c/one atmosphere). 9dtons in a 1dton tank is just as bad.

On that note, wouldn't lhyd face the same problem?

To get back more on topic; when making a system using it, it would be neat to take into account the mentioned energy gained simply from converting the hydrogen to a liquid or gas. Perhaps making the PP process the fuel twice for energy.

-- Zembar
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old September 19th, 2007, 05:55 PM
far-trader far-trader is offline
Noble
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Regina Subsector aka SK, Canada ;-)
Posts: 13,724
Gallery : 12
Visit far-trader's Blog
far-trader Citizen
Default

I figure whatever new whiz-bang golly-gee fangled tech you want to introduce to the rules, is actually how the rules already work

So, you figure Lhyd can be stored more efficiently as a metastable metallic compound? Well of course it can. The Imperium has been doing it for thousands of years.

So, you think the process of converting the state of the Lhyd will produce energy? Sure, that's already factored into the fantastic efficiency of the Powerplant. Did you think the over 100% efficiency was magic?

Anyway, it's kind of a "what, me worry" attitude but it saves redesigning every frakkin ship in the 'verse and adjusting every rule that changes because of it. The dominoes are all lined up. If you change the fuel density, the whole game will start to unravel or need changing. Well, more so than it does already
__________________
Dan "far-trader" Burns

Original material in this post may be employed for personal non-profit use with the origin noted. Any other use is subject to permission from the author. Contact me through the private message feature of this board.

Fund Rare Bard Rants - Donate your unused rants today!

Musings of an old Trader... (my CotI Travellog) updated - May 3 2012
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old September 19th, 2007, 05:59 PM
far-trader far-trader is offline
Noble
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Regina Subsector aka SK, Canada ;-)
Posts: 13,724
Gallery : 12
Visit far-trader's Blog
far-trader Citizen
Default

Oh, and as for needing oxygen to burn/explode and there being none in space. Most ships are mostly oxygen All those non-fuel spaces are oxygen rich.

And no, I don't believe in the stupid "before battle ships routinely depressurize" hooey for a lot of reasons. But that's another topic I've addressed before
__________________
Dan "far-trader" Burns

Original material in this post may be employed for personal non-profit use with the origin noted. Any other use is subject to permission from the author. Contact me through the private message feature of this board.

Fund Rare Bard Rants - Donate your unused rants today!

Musings of an old Trader... (my CotI Travellog) updated - May 3 2012
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old September 20th, 2007, 12:39 AM
ChalkLine ChalkLine is offline
Citizen: SOC-11
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 97
Gallery : 0
ChalkLine Citizen
Default

Isn't Hydrogen a poor choice for fusion? It gives off a huge amount of neutrons, so you irradiate everything or carry around tons of shielding.

I've heard Helium3 is a better choice, although you can't crack it from water.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
fuel usage dm_dracos The Fleet 11 September 9th, 2006 03:10 AM
Hydrogen surfing vegascat Imperial Research Station 20 November 6th, 2003 05:23 AM
Jump engines fuel vs. Power plant fuel Bishop Odo The Fleet 16 January 7th, 2003 12:22 PM
Hydrogen ice bombs vegascat Ship's Locker 57 November 13th, 2002 10:59 AM

This website and its contents are copyright ©2010- Far Future Enterprises. All rights reserved. Traveller is a registered trademark of Far Future Enterprises .
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright (c) 2010-2013, Far Future Enterprises. All Rights Reserved.