Traveller Store CotI Features New Posts Mark Forums Read Register


Go Back TravellerRPG.com > Citizens of the Imperium > General Traveller Discussions > In the OTU

In the OTU In the Official Traveller Universe. Any milieux that's been published in any edition. Not for discussion of rules except in reference to how they reflect the OTU

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 8th, 2018, 01:16 AM
Whipsnade's Avatar
Whipsnade Whipsnade is offline
Citizen: SOC-14
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Dover, New Hampshire, USA
Posts: 5,916
Gallery : 5
Visit Whipsnade's Blog
Whipsnade Citizen+Whipsnade Citizen+Whipsnade Citizen+
Default Abandoned Routes: X-boats in wartime

A nice chat with Grav Moped over in the Ghost Ship thread helped me dredge up some old ideas regarding the x-boat network.

Because the routes the 'boats fly aren't physical objects like rails or roads, they can be adjusted, created, or abandoned with relative ease by shifting tenders or calculating different jump courses. Why the system flies the routes we're shown is a long standing and, in my opinion, insolvable problem. However, this isn't about "explaining" why sub-optimal routes exist or why the Imperium won't change them. This is about all the shenanigans that can happen when the Imperium is forced to change routes and the adventuring possibilities which can arise.

Many events can cause the Imperium to shift routes, but wars and rebellions can force a lot of shifts in a short period of time. A rumor in A:1 Kinunir mentions unrest on Feri in threatening "imperial communications" between Regina and Efate but the fleet position maps for the 5th Frontier War found in SMC suggest all sorts of other possibilities and locations. Most of the routes in Jewell and coreward half of Regina subsector should have been significantly disrupted given the paths of the Zhodani and Vargr fleets and the systems they seized. So many stations and routes should have been disrupted there that I'm not going to use the Jewell/Regina region as an example. Instead, let's look at how the Vilis/Lanth region was effected by the Gram Fleet's offensive and the Consulate's Abyss Campaign.
__________________
"The beauty of CT LBB1-3 is that the ref is free to make such decisions for themselves." - Mike Wightman
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old September 8th, 2018, 01:18 AM
Whipsnade's Avatar
Whipsnade Whipsnade is offline
Citizen: SOC-14
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Dover, New Hampshire, USA
Posts: 5,916
Gallery : 5
Visit Whipsnade's Blog
Whipsnade Citizen+Whipsnade Citizen+Whipsnade Citizen+
Default

Two x-boat routes cross the Lanth/Vilis region where those two campaigns took place. One runs along the border following an Extolay - Denotam - Frenzie - Garda Vilis route. The other a runs few parsecs to trailing on a Dinomn - Ghandi - Lanth - D'Ganzio - Ivendo route. Just prior to the 5FW, the systems along coreward end of the Extolay to Garda Vilis route are defended by the Imperial 1st Fleet while the 23rd Fleet defends that route's rimward systems. The Dinomn to Ivendo route is defended at distance by the 212th round Rhylanor and the 213th in the Lunion region.

When the war starts on 187-1107, the Dinomn to Ivendo route is quickly lost. The Gram Fleet slips past the 213th's right flank and advances into the 23rd's rear. Lanth is under attack by 204-1107, by 001-1108 Lanth and 5 nearby systems are occupied, and by 180-1108 D'Ganzio is also occupied. Lanth will remain occupied until 096-1109 and, according to SMC's position maps, D'Ganzio is occupied until as late as 001-1109.

Along the border, the Extolay to Garda Vilis route remains in operation until the Consulate's 40th Fleet takes Denotam sometime between 180-1108 and 001-1109. A later date seems probable because Ghandi is under attack by the same fleet on 021-1109. (The dates in SMC are muddled a bit with some of the text not quite agreeing with both other parts of the text and the maps. I went with the "worst case" analysis for this example.) Denotam is reoccupied by the 23rd Fleet by 180-1109, but Ghandi remains occupied as late as 001-1110.

Our Extolay to Garda Vilis x-boat route is disrupted at most for a year; 180-1108 to the same date in 1109. The Dinomn to Ivendo route is disrupted for much longer from 204-1107 when Lanth is under attack until when Ghandi is reoccupied sometime between 001 and 120-1110. What's going to happen when those disruptions occur?
__________________
"The beauty of CT LBB1-3 is that the ref is free to make such decisions for themselves." - Mike Wightman
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old September 8th, 2018, 01:19 AM
Whipsnade's Avatar
Whipsnade Whipsnade is offline
Citizen: SOC-14
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Dover, New Hampshire, USA
Posts: 5,916
Gallery : 5
Visit Whipsnade's Blog
Whipsnade Citizen+Whipsnade Citizen+Whipsnade Citizen+
Default

When the invaders arrive, it's bugout time. Depending on the size of the invading force, the local Imperial commanders may order the stations to keep "last message out" 'boat on hand or request space to evacuate personnel. Apart from that, the tenders and other assets working each link in the system are going to prep and dispatch every 'boat they can as quickly as they can. The usual one boat per day per link schedule is out the window. 'Boats will jump as soon as they can be refueled and resupplied. They're going to send out as much data, personnel, and equipment aboard those 'boats as possible too.

Fuel stocks will be the controlling factor. We've often talked about how the canonical tender's small fuel tankage means it needs almost daily refueling itself to support the one boat per day operational tempo. There are good arguments to suggest that each link station usually has a tank farm of sorts on hand. The capacity and number of those tank farms may even be increased in time of war. Whatever fuel is on hand, however, will determine how many 'boats the station can save.

Just where to send the 'boats is another decision to make. Because they have no maneuver drive, sending a 'boat to system where no one is waiting for it is gambling with the lives of those aboard. 'Boats are going to be sent to other systems where x-boat stations are already in place. Failing that, they're going to be sent to systems with enough ship traffic or other assets to make a rescue likely. Failing that, they're not going to sent at all. Fuel is part of this destination decsion too. Look at Lanth for example.

Ghandi is 4 parsecs away while D'Ganzio is only two. Lanth can send two 'boats to D'Ganzio for the fuel "price" of sending one 'boat to Ghandi. In the event of an evacuation, the tender and assets working the Lanth-Ghandi link aren't going to send 'boats back to Ghandi when they can use the same fuel to send more boats to D'Ganzio. The tenders working off Lanth are lucky however. The tenders working off Denotam also have two destinations, but each are 4 parsecs away.

Time is another part of the equation. How long will the tenders working each link station have? How quickly can or will the invaders move against them? Can the defenders spare assets to protect them? With a 'boat arriving every day, will the station be able to keep operating long enough to save one, two, three, or more? The answer to all those questions will depend on the specific details associated with the specific invasion of each specific system. The Gram Fleet assaulting Lanth and it's naval base might decide not to divert any assets to "sweep up" the system's link stations until after the main battles off the mainworld have been decided while the over-strength Consulate 40th Fleet making it's sickle stroke towards Rhylanor to win the war might have enough assets to target Ghandi's link stations immediately.

The position of each link station within their host system will also play a role. Each station is well beyond any 100D stellar jump limit and away from any potential jump shadows. That means each station is "close" to jump space. Tenders have minimal weapons, scout/couriers boast one turret, and the 'boats have no weapons at all. An enemy warship needn't be very big to drop out of jump 3,000km away and order a link station to cease operations.
__________________
"The beauty of CT LBB1-3 is that the ref is free to make such decisions for themselves." - Mike Wightman

Last edited by Whipsnade; September 8th, 2018 at 01:49 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old September 8th, 2018, 01:20 AM
Whipsnade's Avatar
Whipsnade Whipsnade is offline
Citizen: SOC-14
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Dover, New Hampshire, USA
Posts: 5,916
Gallery : 5
Visit Whipsnade's Blog
Whipsnade Citizen+Whipsnade Citizen+Whipsnade Citizen+
Default

Finally, with existing routes lost, the Imperium is going to setup new and, hopefully, temporary ones. The disrupted Dinomn to Ivendo route is, allegedly, Regina's only link to the Imperial core. The Big Boys have their own jump6 courier flying their own routes, but the Hoi Polloi still need to send their mail. Setting up temporary routes could be as easy as positioning the tenders and other assets needed to refuel and resupply 'boats flying those routes.

Resupplying those tenders then becomes the issue. In A:3 Twilight's Peak, we're told the IISS is building a base on Echiste to support x-boat operations along a new Risek - Echiste - Yori - Regina route which suggests much of a station's supply requirements are normally met by the host system. While that might be the Imperium's preference in peacetime, supplying dozens of link stations by ship in wartime would be a trivial effort compared to the logistical effort necessary to supply entire fleets in the "field".
__________________
"The beauty of CT LBB1-3 is that the ref is free to make such decisions for themselves." - Mike Wightman
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old September 8th, 2018, 04:18 AM
mike wightman's Avatar
mike wightman mike wightman is offline
Noble
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 16,070
Gallery : 0
mike wightman Respected Citizenmike wightman Respected Citizenmike wightman Respected Citizenmike wightman Respected Citizenmike wightman Respected Citizenmike wightman Respected Citizenmike wightman Respected Citizen
Default

Interesting stuff, consider it borrowed

Take a look at these quotes:
Any world which is the source of a printed jump-route and is not otherwise marked as holding a base will have a rudimentary scout base for the purposes of support of xboat operations... (S:3 Spinward marches)
it [the x-boat) jumps, relays its messages to the station on arrival, and then waits to be picked up by a tender, to be refuelled and sent on its way with a new load of messages. The local station, meanwhile, accepts messages, encodes them, and transmits them to a tender at the edges of the stellar system. (S:7 Traders and Gunboats)

One of the final MgT1e supplements Space Stations had details of a 10,000t scout station.

So to shift an x-boat route you need to relocate or build a new central hub, this can be a station or a ground installation.

One IN tender could easily move a 10,000t stations, a dozen tenders and a couple of dozen x-boats to a new system, but I can't stop thinking of using a scout service AHL to do the job.

If it can not be saved the compromised station can be evacuated and powered down or destroyed.
__________________
The beauty of CT LBB1-3 is that the ref is free to make such decisions for themselves.

Last edited by mike wightman; September 8th, 2018 at 07:09 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old September 8th, 2018, 05:42 AM
Whipsnade's Avatar
Whipsnade Whipsnade is offline
Citizen: SOC-14
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Dover, New Hampshire, USA
Posts: 5,916
Gallery : 5
Visit Whipsnade's Blog
Whipsnade Citizen+Whipsnade Citizen+Whipsnade Citizen+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mike wightman View Post
Interesting stuff, consider it borrowed
You're welcome to it. As always, please fold, spindle, and mutilate to your heart's content.

Quote:
Take a look at these quotes...
Eagerly.

Quote:
Any world which is the source of a printed jump-route and is not otherwise marked as holding a base will have a rudimentary scout base for the purposes of support of xboat operations...
That's CT right? It folds neatly into the A:3 rumor regarding Echiste. The IISS has some sort of facility in system producing/procuring fungibles for x-boat/tender operations.

Quote:
it [the x-boat) jumps, relays its messages to the station on arrival...
My bad. I should have provided definitions for some of my descriptions.

By "link station" I meant the collection of tender(s), scout/couriers, small craft, and tank farms tasked with supporting operations for each of a system's x-boat links. Much like how one 'boat per day per link is the generally accepted canonical operational tempo, having each link serviced by it's own group in-system assets is also generally accepted. The reasons for this have to do with the different jump shadows and relative velocities the different systems will have.

Thus Lanth will have two "link stations". One for the Lanth-Ghandi link and one for the Lanth-D'Ganzio link. Similarly, Ivendo will have three stations; once each for it's links to D'Ganzio, Equus, and Icetina.

These "link stations" will transmit 'boat messages to "central" station as needed.

Quote:
So to shift an x-boat route you need to relocate or build a new central hub, this can be a station or a ground installation.
More accurately, perhaps, is that a system on a permanent x-boat route will have a central station; i.e. the building project on Echiste. A temporary or "hostilities only" will make do with tenders only and those will be supplied from other systems.

Quote:
If it can not be saved the compromised station can be evacuated and powered down or destroyed.
Agreed. Depending on the amount of time the invaders "allow" between arriving in the system and detaching assets to "occupy" the station, the link stations I wrote about could be fully or partially evacuated, see their ships "scuttled", and take other measures.

Imagine the Gram Fleet invading Lanth. The entire force chooses to concentrate on the mainworld and the Imperial assets nearby. Located in outer system, the two "link stations" use the reprieve to begin saving as much as they can. First, every 'boat on hand is fueled to jump away. Most will go to D'Ganzio because that 2 parsec distance use less of the fuel the stations have on hand while one 'boat will be sent to Ghandi to "turn off" the flow of 'boats from that system. Any scout/couriers on hand will be fueled to leave too.

Both stations will ship off all but a skeleton crew aboard the departing 'boats and couriers plus whatever stores, equipment, parts, and supplies aren't absolutely needed. The station's collection of small craft will made inoperable and the tank farm(s) readied to either "spill" or be self destruct.

Both Ghandi and D'Ganzio will keep sending daily 'boats to Lanth for the week it takes news of the invasion to reach them. Each day another 'boat will arrive and, if the Gram Fleet still hasn't taken steps to "occupy" the stations, it will be refueled and resupplied as quickly as possible so it can escape. Again, D'Ganzio will be the preferred destination because fueling the 'boat for that trip will only take half the time needed to fuel a 'boat for Ghandi. It's even possible that each station may keep a prepped 'boat on hand as a "getaway car" to be used when enemy assets finally arrive.

The skeleton staff at the station is going to keep refueling newly arrived boats and sending them off to D'Ganzio until assets from the Gram Fleet arrive with weapons range. When that happens, they're going to slag data banks, wreck computers, and otherwise render the tender inoperable while waiting to taken prisoner.

Of course all of this is made moot if the invading force details a few escorts to "sweep up" the link stations from the start. The stations are "close" to jump space and an enemy can appear as close as 3000km from their known positions. Given the weapons aboard a tender, it wouldn't take much a warship to "capture" a link station. Then again, the defenders may have some of their own warships providing cover.
__________________
"The beauty of CT LBB1-3 is that the ref is free to make such decisions for themselves." - Mike Wightman

Last edited by Whipsnade; September 8th, 2018 at 06:14 AM.. Reason: grammar
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old September 10th, 2018, 10:50 AM
BRJN BRJN is offline
Citizen: SOC-12
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Fort Wayne
Posts: 138
Gallery : 0
BRJN Citizen
Default

IMTU, I've been re-writing some of the Solomani efforts in The Rebellion.

A well-thought-out invasion plan of the Solomani Rim sector is going to rip up Coreward-bound communications. This is frighteningly easy when you analyze the marked X-boat routes. The Imperium must have "backup plans" in the event of invasion. (I send some Deep Strike Squadrons to where those "backup plans" might build new infrastructure, with instructions to look around for it.)
__________________
Master, Hero (Siigiizuni)-class freighter Salutary Neglect.
Founder of Epsilon Ceti interface line.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old September 10th, 2018, 07:01 PM
Whipsnade's Avatar
Whipsnade Whipsnade is offline
Citizen: SOC-14
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Dover, New Hampshire, USA
Posts: 5,916
Gallery : 5
Visit Whipsnade's Blog
Whipsnade Citizen+Whipsnade Citizen+Whipsnade Citizen+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BRJN View Post
A well-thought-out invasion plan of the Solomani Rim sector is going to rip up Coreward-bound communications. This is frighteningly easy when you analyze the marked X-boat routes. The Imperium must have "backup plans" in the event of invasion.

We know the "important" people and organizations don't use or need the X-boat system. The navy, the nobility, the megacorps, none of them bother with the X-boat system. They have their own jump6 couriers and other assets instead. Their system is one "backup" system and it is working alongside the everyday system all the time.

That being said, there must be plans to reroute and restore links within the system because of all the other people and organizations which use it. There must be plans to "bugout" whatever kit can be saved when the war arrives too.

(By the way, private conversations with other anons pointed out there was some confusion over the terms I used. "Link station" refers to those assets working at the region in a system where x-boats flying a route between two systems arrive and depart. A "link station" is made up of a revolving cast of tenders, small craft, scout/couriers, x-boats, tank farms, stations like Mr. Pearce's wonderful 300dTon variant, and other assets. It doesn't refer to a single physical object. Descriptions of the system also refer to a "station" on or in orbit around the mainworld which handles messages traffic between the mainworld and tenders.)

Because link station operate well outside any local 100D jump limits and because their locations are going to remain relatively fixed, the link stations are going to be hideously vulnerable to an enemy. Jump drive has an accuracy of 3000km per parsec jumped so an enemy can exit jump space within easy weapons range to shoot up a link station. Station locations within a system are going to chosen on the basis of two criteria. First, clearing any jump shadows which exist on a jump course between the two systems in question. Second, limiting comm lag between the link station and the mainworld. While those criteria are going to be paramount in peacetime, keeping the system operating will be the sole priority in wartime.

Apart from tank farms, the assets making up link station are mobile. They can displace within systems and there's a lot of room within a system. Clearing jump shadows will still be necessary; limiting comm times between link stations and the mainworld will not. Link stations could "bugout" to other locations within the system on a war warning. The station at the other end of their link just needs to know where to send the 'boats and when to start sending them there. Multiple "bugouts" within a system could also occur on a schedule; i.e. Location A during weeks 1 thru 5, Location B during weeks 6 thru 10, etc.

The canonical tender's one parsec jump range gives it lousy interstellar "legs". That same range can be an option during a "bugout" within a system. If the distance involved is great enough, a tender can jump ahead to a new link station location carrying what fuel and small craft are needed to setup operations there while leaving behind enough assets to maintain operations at the old point for the week or so 'boats continue to use it.

This "location hopping" can help maintain the system's operation much like how frequency hopping does the same thing with cell phones.
__________________
"The beauty of CT LBB1-3 is that the ref is free to make such decisions for themselves." - Mike Wightman
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old September 11th, 2018, 06:00 AM
Ulsyus's Avatar
Ulsyus Ulsyus is offline
Count
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Trailing to Rimward
Posts: 1,482
Gallery : 0
Visit Ulsyus's Blog
Ulsyus Citizen+Ulsyus Citizen+Ulsyus Citizen+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BRJN View Post
The Imperium must have "backup plans" in the event of invasion. (I send some Deep Strike Squadrons to where those "backup plans" might build new infrastructure, with instructions to look around for it.)
That's always good risk management

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whipsnade View Post
We know the "important" people and organizations don't use or need the X-boat system. The navy, the nobility, the megacorps, none of them bother with the X-boat system. They have their own jump6 couriers and other assets instead. Their system is one "backup" system and it is working alongside the everyday system all the time.

That being said, there must be plans to reroute and restore links within the system because of all the other people and organizations which use it. There must be plans to "bugout" whatever kit can be saved when the war arrives too.
The network is extensive and well tested over time, but how great is the investment in infrastructure compared with a subsector or greater naval force? If it's not that much in comparison but contributes significantly to the connectedness of the worlds of the Imperium then how likely is it that there would be contingency and redundancy and replacement plans in place? How many X-boats exist per link in the route? Four per leg, or more? Would there be a store of X-boats mothballed away in each sub-sector to jump along the network to replace losses along it, or would there be dispersed spare vessels at each node where the tenders work?

I have my own ideas about all of that, but am keen to hear other thoughts...
__________________
Pray assign me any part in the government you please; but remember that no single man can bear the whole burden of Empire

Tiberius Claudius Nero Caesar

_____________________________________________
tc+ mt 23 tne t4 t5 IMTU: ru+ ge 3i c+ au+ as+ so da+
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old September 11th, 2018, 06:33 AM
Whipsnade's Avatar
Whipsnade Whipsnade is offline
Citizen: SOC-14
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Dover, New Hampshire, USA
Posts: 5,916
Gallery : 5
Visit Whipsnade's Blog
Whipsnade Citizen+Whipsnade Citizen+Whipsnade Citizen+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ulsyus View Post
The network is extensive and well tested over time, but how great is the investment in infrastructure compared with a subsector or greater naval force?

You'd be surprised at how much the system costs.

Quote:
How many X-boats exist per link in the route? Four per leg, or more?
Four? Try fourteen at the very least. A system on an x-boat receives one 'boat per day per link. That's seven boats flying each link in one direction at any given moment. To that number, you'll need to add a 'boat prepped and waiting to depart as soon as the incoming 'boat's data load can be transferred plus another which can be swapped for an outgoing or incoming 'boat requiring maintenance. You're up to eighteen 'boats per each link now and you haven't even begun to count the tenders, scout/couriers, tankers, and small craft servicing each link in each system.

Quote:
Would there be a store of X-boats mothballed away in each sub-sector to jump along the network to replace losses along it, or would there be dispersed spare vessels at each node where the tenders work?
Yes, if only to make up for 'boats undergoing annual maintenance. With annual maintenance requiring two weeks out of every 52, you're going to need 54 boats at the very least to keep 52 available. Don't forget to factor in annual and unforeseen maintenance for all your tenders, scout/couriers, tankers, and small craft too.

Along with those spares being staged at central points, as I already explained there will also be spare 'boats already in each of the systems along the route to provide availability in the case of an operational 'boat needs to be taken out of service.

While you're trying to tally up all the ships and small craft the system needs, start thinking about all the salaries, supplies, fuel, parts, repairs, training, pensions, rations, fungibles, mainworld stations, bases, and other expenses too.

Quote:
I have my own ideas about all of that, but am keen to hear other thoughts...
They should be interesting to read.
__________________
"The beauty of CT LBB1-3 is that the ref is free to make such decisions for themselves." - Mike Wightman
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Abandoned scout vegascat TAS Opinion Polls 76 October 23rd, 2018 12:10 AM
Is Pirates of Drinax abandoned? Murphy Mongoose Traveller 16 February 17th, 2015 11:33 PM
Scouts in Wartime c_osborne Imperial Interstellar Scout Service 36 June 7th, 2010 11:43 PM
Once mention, or abandoned items of Traveller cannon Bishop Odo In My Traveller Universe 25 August 20th, 2008 03:39 AM
TNE to be abandoned? jackleg Traveller: The New Era 23 August 30th, 2007 11:26 PM

This website and its contents are copyright ©2010- Far Future Enterprises. All rights reserved. Traveller is a registered trademark of Far Future Enterprises .
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright (c) 2010-2013, Far Future Enterprises. All Rights Reserved.