Traveller Store CotI Features New Posts Mark Forums Read Register


Go Back TravellerRPG.com > Citizens of the Imperium > Other Versions of Traveller > Mongoose Traveller

Mongoose Traveller Discussion forums for the Traveller rules from Mongoose Publishing.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old August 4th, 2007, 03:06 PM
richardtalbotuk richardtalbotuk is offline
Citizen: SOC-8
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Scotland
Posts: 34
Gallery : 0
richardtalbotuk Citizen
Send a message via ICQ to richardtalbotuk Send a message via AIM to richardtalbotuk
Default

I am of two minds about this...

Mongoose's implementation of RQ was welcomed but flawed in quite a few areas.

I'm also a little tired of yet "another version" Traveller on top of the expected T5 release. As I GM many Traveller games at cons the age old question of "What version are you running" always comes up and this adds more fuel to the fire.

that being said it will be a new "live" version and should be well supported.

My brain is still digesting this though...
__________________
R Talbot - Scotland
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old August 4th, 2007, 03:16 PM
hunter hunter is offline
Ancient - Absent Friend
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,168
Gallery : 18
Visit hunter's Blog
hunter Citizen
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by richardtalbotuk View Post
I am of two minds about this...

Mongoose's implementation of RQ was welcomed but flawed in quite a few areas.

I'm also a little tired of yet "another version" Traveller on top of the expected T5 release. As I GM many Traveller games at cons the age old question of "What version are you running" always comes up and this adds more fuel to the fire.
One of the points of the Mongoose license is to eventually bring Traveller back to one core system (Mongoose as the 'basic', T5 as the 'advanced'). The only way to have done it cleanly would have been to buy out the existing licensees of their licenses (if they were willing to sell). Without doing that the existing licenses will run their course and not be renewed under their current terms and will have to work with Mongoose under the new licenses.
__________________
[b]Current Projects[/b][LIST][*][url=http://www.scifigaming.com]SciFi Gaming[/url][*][url=http://www.rpgnow.com/index.php?cPath=129_7888]The SciFi20 Project[/url][*][url=http://www.rpgnow.com/product_info.php?products_id=96742]The SciFi20 Rules Bundle[/url] [COLOR="red"][SIZE="1"][b]New![/b][/SIZE][/COLOR][*][url=http://www.rpgnow.com/product_info.php?products_id=96744]The SciFi20 Rules Bundle w/Screen[/url] [COLOR="red"][SIZE="1"][b]New![/b][/SIZE][/COLOR]
[/LIST]
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old August 4th, 2007, 03:23 PM
aramis's Avatar
aramis aramis is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Anchorage, AK, USofA
Posts: 28,924
Gallery : 53
Visit aramis's Blog
aramis has disabled reputation
Send a message via ICQ to aramis Send a message via AIM to aramis Send a message via Yahoo to aramis
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hunter View Post
Most likely T5's task system.
T5's draft was the same one as T4.1, as released by MWM on the TML, just reworded.
__________________
~ Aramis
aramis.hostman.us /trav
Smith & Wesson: The Original Point and Click interface!

Archduke of Sylea (CORE 2118)
Duke of the Third Imperium (SPIN 0534)
Count Terra (SOLO 1827)
Count Gorod (REFT 1302)
Count of the Third Imperium (SPIN 2232)
Viscount of Adabicci (SPIN 1824)
Marquis of the Solomani Rim (SOLO 0606)
Marquis of the Third Imperium (SPIN 2410)
Baron of the Third Imperium (SPIN 2231)
Knight of the Iridium Throne (CORE 1434)
Sir William Hostman (OLDE 0512)
Sir William Hostman (DAGU 0622)
Knight of Deneb (REFT 2239)
Knight of Deneb (Spin 2532)
SEH w/Diamonds for Extreme Heroism - Battle of Boughene
MCG - Battle of Boughene
TAS: William Hostman (CORR 2506)
TAS: Bearer (DAIB 1326)
IMTU ct+ tm++ tne tg-- tt+ tmo+ t4- t20+ to ru+ ge+ 3i+ c+ jt au ls pi+ ta he+ st+
Wil Hostman 0602 C539857-9 S A724
OTU: 95% 3i an+ au+ br- cpu± dt± f+ fs++ ge± ih- inf± j± jf+ jm+ jt+ ls- n= nc+ pi+ pp-- tp+ tr+ tv- vi-- xb+-
Unless there is bold red text, presume my posts to be my personal material only.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old August 4th, 2007, 03:28 PM
hunter hunter is offline
Ancient - Absent Friend
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,168
Gallery : 18
Visit hunter's Blog
hunter Citizen
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aramis View Post
T5's draft was the same one as T4.1, as released by MWM on the TML, just reworded.
I know half-dice were removed (Bruce and I gave Marc hell about them till he agreed to drop em ). There are a few other changes I am aware of as well. Of course the drafts available on the net are incredibly old and out of date.
__________________
[b]Current Projects[/b][LIST][*][url=http://www.scifigaming.com]SciFi Gaming[/url][*][url=http://www.rpgnow.com/index.php?cPath=129_7888]The SciFi20 Project[/url][*][url=http://www.rpgnow.com/product_info.php?products_id=96742]The SciFi20 Rules Bundle[/url] [COLOR="red"][SIZE="1"][b]New![/b][/SIZE][/COLOR][*][url=http://www.rpgnow.com/product_info.php?products_id=96744]The SciFi20 Rules Bundle w/Screen[/url] [COLOR="red"][SIZE="1"][b]New![/b][/SIZE][/COLOR]
[/LIST]
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old August 4th, 2007, 04:08 PM
GypsyComet's Avatar
GypsyComet GypsyComet is offline
Citizen: SOC-14
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 3,616
Gallery : 3
GypsyComet Citizen++GypsyComet Citizen++GypsyComet Citizen++GypsyComet Citizen++
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hunter View Post
One of the points of the Mongoose license is to eventually bring Traveller back to one core system (Mongoose as the 'basic', T5 as the 'advanced'). The only way to have done it cleanly would have been to buy out the existing licensees of their licenses (if they were willing to sell). Without doing that the existing licenses will run their course and not be renewed under their current terms and will have to work with Mongoose under the new licenses.
Bringing Traveller back to one core system wasn't working for the players when there was only one edition in print at a time and only three total. Why is it suddenly going to work with TMon, which will be what, the SEVENTH set of RPG mechanics in print?

Hunter, I would recommend not being resigned to losing the license just yet. Mongoose's history is such that Marc may be glad to keep you around a few years from now.
__________________
We are all playing different games that happen to have the same name.

"Alright. Where did that Beaker get a cred stick?"
(Website down until further notice)
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old August 4th, 2007, 04:22 PM
Gallowglacht's Avatar
Gallowglacht Gallowglacht is offline
Citizen: SOC-12
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 491
Gallery : 0
Gallowglacht Citizen
Default

By the looks of it Mongooses fans in the Starship Troopers section aren't too chuffed with the idea.

I'd rather stick with T20 for a while so Hunter if you have stuff in the works I'd buy that over Mongoose Traveller.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old August 4th, 2007, 04:46 PM
flyteach flyteach is offline
Citizen: SOC-8
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 38
Gallery : 0
flyteach Citizen
Default Mongoose

Color me confused.......

Started with CT for my 18th birthday. Absolutely loved it!

MT was great, IMHO. I know it had errors, but was playable, easily mixed with CT stuff (if not just a superset).

TNE put me off due to the setting, didn't really get into the rules.

T4 was a product from a group that didn't seem to know much at all about Traveller and seemed to have sprung out of nowhere. Lot's of flash and sizzle, but no substance.

GT isn't my cup of tea. Like the CT flavor.

T20 seemed to be overwhelming until I saw the many ways it could be used in CT and that there was actually new stuff (not just reprints) being created.

Glad I didn't hold my breath for T5 for the last 6 years or so, couldn't even make the 30th anniversary deadline with a 2 year announcement.

Now I see this Mongoose company, which (not that it means much) I've never heard of and has had nothing to do with Traveller for the last 30 years. They claim they are going to be THE ruleset. Seems to me that they were just the highest bidder to MWM to capture the name. But with no background, I'm hardpressed to put any faith (or $$) into their products. Just the comments from their RQ release seems to point to the fact that this is just another Imperium Games (T4) fiasco.

Now, when T20 is spreading it's wings and looking like a really nice ruleset to use along with some new and unique adventure and background material, it's going to all go into the dumpster in favor of some new, untried, never before heard of ruleset from a company with no experience and not a very good reputation.

I know that many will think this is simply a rant, but I hope that some will read it and possibly respond in a better light (but just saying "oh, this is great" will not be useful). This seems as dark as the Virus announcement.

Am I truly missing something here? It's certainly not a budget issue for me. I had to scrape and save all through college to get Traveller books (1980 to 1984). Gainfully employed since and can buy what I want, but I really have to want to. I'm just not impressed that MWM seems to be selling out to a minor league player.

And it certainly seems to me that building up ANOTHER rule set does nothing to stop the fractionalizing. It simply produces another ruleset (which I have no desire or need for) and I don't see where they're talking about new and unique material. That's what I really like about T20, the unique material that QLI has published is some of the best stuff since the Keith brothers.

<sigh!>

That's my take,

Jim Ujcik
(if you want to rant back to me in private, feel free at:

soareagle -at- flightbrothers -dot- com)
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old August 4th, 2007, 04:52 PM
hunter hunter is offline
Ancient - Absent Friend
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,168
Gallery : 18
Visit hunter's Blog
hunter Citizen
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GypsyComet View Post
Hunter, I would recommend not being resigned to losing the license just yet. Mongoose's history is such that Marc may be glad to keep you around a few years from now.
Thank you very much! I'm not worried about losing the license. I work very closely with Marc and consider him both friend and mentor. Because of this I support Traveller in any form. While as a licensee I have a few issues with what has gone down (and I have known about it for quite awhile), I support the move. It's a good deal for Marc and I think it will be a good thing for Traveller overall.

As far as T20 goes, I still have 3 years on my current license, and lets just say T20 as a ruleset won't likely disappear after that. I intend to pick up any licenses necessary to continue to support Gateway under the Mongoose terms when our current license expires.

2320 is not affected by this at all let me also add.
__________________
[b]Current Projects[/b][LIST][*][url=http://www.scifigaming.com]SciFi Gaming[/url][*][url=http://www.rpgnow.com/index.php?cPath=129_7888]The SciFi20 Project[/url][*][url=http://www.rpgnow.com/product_info.php?products_id=96742]The SciFi20 Rules Bundle[/url] [COLOR="red"][SIZE="1"][b]New![/b][/SIZE][/COLOR][*][url=http://www.rpgnow.com/product_info.php?products_id=96744]The SciFi20 Rules Bundle w/Screen[/url] [COLOR="red"][SIZE="1"][b]New![/b][/SIZE][/COLOR]
[/LIST]
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old August 4th, 2007, 04:56 PM
hunter hunter is offline
Ancient - Absent Friend
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,168
Gallery : 18
Visit hunter's Blog
hunter Citizen
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gallowglacht View Post
I'd rather stick with T20 for a while so Hunter if you have stuff in the works I'd buy that over Mongoose Traveller.
Thanks again! You guys don't know how good hearing things like this makes me feel. I appreciate the support more than I can tell you!
__________________
[b]Current Projects[/b][LIST][*][url=http://www.scifigaming.com]SciFi Gaming[/url][*][url=http://www.rpgnow.com/index.php?cPath=129_7888]The SciFi20 Project[/url][*][url=http://www.rpgnow.com/product_info.php?products_id=96742]The SciFi20 Rules Bundle[/url] [COLOR="red"][SIZE="1"][b]New![/b][/SIZE][/COLOR][*][url=http://www.rpgnow.com/product_info.php?products_id=96744]The SciFi20 Rules Bundle w/Screen[/url] [COLOR="red"][SIZE="1"][b]New![/b][/SIZE][/COLOR]
[/LIST]
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old August 4th, 2007, 05:01 PM
hunter hunter is offline
Ancient - Absent Friend
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,168
Gallery : 18
Visit hunter's Blog
hunter Citizen
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flyteach View Post
T20 seemed to be overwhelming until I saw the many ways it could be used in CT and that there was actually new stuff (not just reprints) being created.
Always good to hear!

Quote:
Now I see this Mongoose company, which (not that it means much) I've never heard of and has had nothing to do with Traveller for the last 30 years. They claim they are going to be THE ruleset. Seems to me that they were just the highest bidder to MWM to capture the name. But with no background, I'm hardpressed to put any faith (or $$) into their products. Just the comments from their RQ release seems to point to the fact that this is just another Imperium Games (T4) fiasco.
Actually Mongoose is one of the bigger players in the industry right now with its hands on some nice licenses, particularly in the SciFi genre.

Quote:
Now, when T20 is spreading it's wings and looking like a really nice ruleset to use along with some new and unique adventure and background material, it's going to all go into the dumpster in favor of some new, untried, never before heard of ruleset from a company with no experience and not a very good reputation.
T20 isn't being dumped lets get that clear. I still have 3 years on my current license and I have plans to continue the rules beyond that point.

Quote:
Am I truly missing something here? It's certainly not a budget issue for me. I had to scrape and save all through college to get Traveller books (1980 to 1984). Gainfully employed since and can buy what I want, but I really have to want to. I'm just not impressed that MWM seems to be selling out to a minor league player.
I wouldn't call Mongoose a minor league player. They have the Conan license, Runequest, Starship Troopers, Babylon 5 and a number of other high profile licenses in their stable. They play to use Traveller to power the scifi stuff.

Quote:
And it certainly seems to me that building up ANOTHER rule set does nothing to stop the fractionalizing. It simply produces another ruleset (which I have no desire or need for) and I don't see where they're talking about new and unique material. That's what I really like about T20, the unique material that QLI has published is some of the best stuff since the Keith brothers.
Wow thanks! That's about as high a compliment as we've gotten being compared to the Keith brothers!
__________________
[b]Current Projects[/b][LIST][*][url=http://www.scifigaming.com]SciFi Gaming[/url][*][url=http://www.rpgnow.com/index.php?cPath=129_7888]The SciFi20 Project[/url][*][url=http://www.rpgnow.com/product_info.php?products_id=96742]The SciFi20 Rules Bundle[/url] [COLOR="red"][SIZE="1"][b]New![/b][/SIZE][/COLOR][*][url=http://www.rpgnow.com/product_info.php?products_id=96744]The SciFi20 Rules Bundle w/Screen[/url] [COLOR="red"][SIZE="1"][b]New![/b][/SIZE][/COLOR]
[/LIST]
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cosmos returns! Andrew Boulton The Lone Star 7 September 28th, 2005 04:56 PM

This website and its contents are copyright ©2010- Far Future Enterprises. All rights reserved. Traveller is a registered trademark of Far Future Enterprises .
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright (c) 2010-2013, Far Future Enterprises. All Rights Reserved.