Traveller Store CotI Features New Posts Mark Forums Read Register


Go Back TravellerRPG.com > Citizens of the Imperium > Other Versions of Traveller > Mongoose Traveller

Mongoose Traveller Discussion forums for the Traveller rules from Mongoose Publishing.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #131  
Old September 11th, 2016, 01:13 AM
flg flg is offline
Citizen: SOC-10
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 61
Gallery : 0
flg Citizen-
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aramis View Post
Would not be the first time they got caught in a lie.
To be fair, I don't know if Mongoose themselves claimed that the original intent was horizontal or if that came from other people in the playtest, which is why I left the question open. I'd prefer to think that someone in the chain misunderstood something than outright lied about it.

Still, if the books did go through the approval process (which Matt claims they did), then how did this get missed? Ultimately the responsibility is with the people who approved the change, isn't it? So either they were OK with it (which means that they should come here and say that was what happened), or they didn't notice it (which means that the approval process isn't very effective).
  #132  
Old September 11th, 2016, 01:33 PM
DickNervous's Avatar
DickNervous DickNervous is offline
Baron
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Levittown NY
Posts: 488
Gallery : 3
Visit DickNervous's Blog
DickNervous Citizen+DickNervous Citizen+
Default

Not that I want to throw gas on the fire, and I completely understand the arguments that Mongoose went and changed an iconic ship, but......

I was looking through the files from the CT CD and noticed that the only place the AHL deck plans are detailed is in "CT G03 Game 03a Azhanti High Lightning Complete" (and two files split from this) and "CT 05 Supplement 05 Lightning Class Cruisers". The first of which is a ruleset for a miniatures game and the second a supplement for use with that game (at least based upon the title of the book). While the books do not have a complete deck plan of the entire ship, it does list them in such a way that you can (safely) assume that they were laid out like a building, with 84 decks.

Now perhaps I am being naive here, but isn't it possible that the detailed deck plans were organized like a "skyscraper" simply to make it easier to print and play the miniatures game? Otherwise the deck plans would be very large and, at that time, prohibitively expensive to print for a retail game.

The reason I mention this is that the other reference I found to AHL is in "CT S09 Supplement 09 Fighting Ships" where on page 31 it clearly shows an image of a 60,000 ton "Frontier Cruiser" (which is identified as the AHL in the comments) flying "belly down", which would appear to support the layout that Mongoose published.

However, the bottom line is that, quite honestly, it doesn't really matter. We can use either layout, or even create our own. After all, it isn't the first time that a newer book has been published that has changed some previously published "fact", nor will it likely be the last.

Now I will take my 2cr, step tot the side, and keep my mouth shut.
__________________
]
DickNervous aka Rich Neves
Viscount of Equus - SPIN 2417 Equus B55A858-B
Baron of Ishala - VLAN 2113 Ishala C866651-9
Baron of Enaaka - DENE 0203 Enaaka B777786-6
Knight of Deneb - SPIN 1721 ARBA C200200-C
  #133  
Old September 11th, 2016, 01:59 PM
McPerth's Avatar
McPerth McPerth is online now
Citizen: SOC-14
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Barcelona
Posts: 7,463
Gallery : 0
Visit McPerth's Blog
McPerth has disabled reputation
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DickNervous View Post
I was looking through the files from the CT CD and noticed that the only place the AHL deck plans are detailed is in "CT G03 Game 03a Azhanti High Lightning Complete" (and two files split from this) and "CT 05 Supplement 05 Lightning Class Cruisers". The first of which is a ruleset for a miniatures game and the second a supplement for use with that game (at least based upon the title of the book). While the books do not have a complete deck plan of the entire ship, it does list them in such a way that you can (safely) assume that they were laid out like a building, with 84 decks.
CT:S5 Lightning Class Cruisers was (IIRC) released initially only as a part of the game, and has the deailed deckplans for all the decks, as the game does.

Its deckplans also appear in MT Arrival Vengeance and and (partially, not all the maps) in the Challenge #42, pages 50-51, as part of the amber zone Ressearch Station Beta.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DickNervous View Post
Now perhaps I am being naive here, but isn't it possible that the detailed deck plans were organized like a "skyscraper" simply to make it easier to print and play the miniatures game? Otherwise the deck plans would be very large and, at that time, prohibitively expensive to print for a retail game.
As I already commented, that's quite posible. A deckplan of the Azhanti as belly sitter would be over 2 m long, and difficult playing the tactical game on it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DickNervous View Post
The reason I mention this is that the other reference I found to AHL is in "CT S09 Supplement 09 Fighting Ships" where on page 31 it clearly shows an image of a 60,000 ton "Frontier Cruiser" (which is identified as the AHL in the comments) flying "belly down", which would appear to support the layout that Mongoose published.
I would not say the fact of appearing in vertical or horitzontal stance in the pictures in S9 means anything about its internal layout. If so;
  • the Atlantis and the Kikirrak (appearing in vertical stance) would be skyscrapper internal layout (IDK if that's true).
  • the Broadsword, that appears in diagonal stance should have diagonal internal layout?
  • And the Plankwell would be the funniest of all, as it appears vertical on its side...

Quote:
Originally Posted by DickNervous View Post
However, the bottom line is that, quite honestly, it doesn't really matter. We can use either layout, or even create our own. After all, it isn't the first time that a newer book has been published that has changed some previously published "fact", nor will it likely be the last.
Sure, but just the fact of not having identifies it with one of the ships whose internal layout was better detailed would have avoided enraging the grognards...
__________________
Duke of ShaiaVland 3215 B64A998-E
Marquis of Ashtagz Tyui SR 1818C548786-8
SEH for actions in Extolay

I'm not afraid about bullets, what scares me is the speed at which they're incoming.
  #134  
Old September 11th, 2016, 03:47 PM
Nightwind1's Avatar
Nightwind1 Nightwind1 is offline
Citizen: SOC-12
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 129
Gallery : 2
Nightwind1 Citizen
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DickNervous View Post
Not that I want to throw gas on the fire, and I completely understand the arguments that Mongoose went and changed an iconic ship, but......

I was looking through the files from the CT CD and noticed that the only place the AHL deck plans are detailed is in "CT G03 Game 03a Azhanti High Lightning Complete" (and two files split from this) and "CT 05 Supplement 05 Lightning Class Cruisers". The first of which is a ruleset for a miniatures game and the second a supplement for use with that game (at least based upon the title of the book). While the books do not have a complete deck plan of the entire ship, it does list them in such a way that you can (safely) assume that they were laid out like a building, with 84 decks.

Now perhaps I am being naive here, but isn't it possible that the detailed deck plans were organized like a "skyscraper" simply to make it easier to print and play the miniatures game? Otherwise the deck plans would be very large and, at that time, prohibitively expensive to print for a retail game.

The reason I mention this is that the other reference I found to AHL is in "CT S09 Supplement 09 Fighting Ships" where on page 31 it clearly shows an image of a 60,000 ton "Frontier Cruiser" (which is identified as the AHL in the comments) flying "belly down", which would appear to support the layout that Mongoose published.

However, the bottom line is that, quite honestly, it doesn't really matter. We can use either layout, or even create our own. After all, it isn't the first time that a newer book has been published that has changed some previously published "fact", nor will it likely be the last.

Now I will take my 2cr, step tot the side, and keep my mouth shut.
You also forgot MT "Arrival Vengeance", which has deckplans based on the original, but even MORE detailed in certain respects. Including the Bridge of the ship, the Lounge Deck and other decks, and a side-view cutaway that shows over 80 decks, bow-to-stern.

  #135  
Old September 11th, 2016, 07:04 PM
Whipsnade's Avatar
Whipsnade Whipsnade is offline
Citizen: SOC-14
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Dover, New Hampshire, USA
Posts: 5,916
Gallery : 5
Visit Whipsnade's Blog
Whipsnade Citizen+Whipsnade Citizen+Whipsnade Citizen+
Default

The only surprising in all of this is that some of you still find it surprising.

The nature of Mongoose as a company has been obvious to anyone paying attention from the first. Complaining now that Mongoose has ▮▮▮▮ed up the AHL deckplans when Mongoose has been constantly ▮▮▮▮ing up Traveller from their very first product is a case of locking the barn door after the horse escapes. Actually, it's more a case of locking the barn door after the horse escaped, lived a long life, died, and it's corpse rendered down for glue.

Mongoose ▮▮▮▮ed up the AHL deckplans and is now lying about that ▮▮▮▮ up for the same reason the scorpion stung the turtle: It's what Mongoose does and it's what Mongoose is.

And if that's suddenly new to you, you haven't been paying attention.

The solution to all this is simple: Don't buy Mongoose products.

Money is the only thing they listen to. Not MWM, not DonM, not Robject, and most definitely not you. Hit them in the wallet and they'll start paying attention.
  #136  
Old September 11th, 2016, 08:32 PM
atpollard's Avatar
atpollard atpollard is offline
Citizen: SOC-14
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Port Richey
Posts: 9,323
Gallery : 43
Visit atpollard's Blog
atpollard Awesomeatpollard Awesomeatpollard Awesomeatpollard Awesomeatpollard Awesomeatpollard Awesomeatpollard Awesomeatpollard Awesomeatpollard Awesomeatpollard Awesomeatpollard Awesome
Default

Thread Closed.

There has been more than enough heat and far too little light for a while now.

After so many pages, there seems nothing new to be said and only flame wars and infractions ahead.

If there is an official announcement, one of the Administrators will post it.
Until then, go play Traveller or some other activity that brings pleasure to you and no grief to me.
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Element 118 Officially Named whulorigan Imperial Research Station 1 July 12th, 2016 02:23 AM
anyone ever use any of these deckplans? flykiller The Lone Star 6 March 10th, 2015 04:28 PM
Deckplans LordVan The Fleet 6 May 5th, 2008 11:57 PM
Official deckplans vs. accurate deckplans bozzutoman The Fleet 56 May 31st, 2006 09:40 PM

This website and its contents are copyright ©2010- Far Future Enterprises. All rights reserved. Traveller is a registered trademark of Far Future Enterprises .
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright (c) 2010-2013, Far Future Enterprises. All Rights Reserved.