Traveller Store CotI Features New Posts Mark Forums Read Register


Go Back TravellerRPG.com > Citizens of the Imperium > General Traveller Discussions > Adventurers

Adventurers Tell us your Traveller character stats, skills, and details.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old September 26th, 2019, 01:23 PM
nobby-w nobby-w is offline
Citizen: SOC-13
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: The High Weald.
Posts: 707
Gallery : 10
nobby-w Citizen+nobby-w Citizen+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnotherDilbert View Post
[ . . . ]
Gauss rifles are meant to fight combat armour and battle dress:


ACRs are meant to fight cloth-type armour:
Are you trying to argue that gauss rifles are not overpowered because they're intended to be used against armoured targets?

In both CT and Striker, weapons intended for use against armoured targets tend to be insta-kill against targets not wearing heavy armour. The RAW for both systems largely conflate armour penetration ability with damage and don't really accommodate armour piercing rounds that don't necessarily do lots of damage when they hit. This is one of the key balance issues with the systems.

Here are some probabilities - Assume a protagonist armed with a gauss rifle firing at a target wearing cloth armour. Skill 2, no dex mods, effective range. Death=9D house rule.
RollHitsAv. Dam
200
3119.8 (5.67D)
4119.8 (5.67D)
5239.7 (11.33D)
6239.7 (11.33D)
7359.5 (17D)
8359.5 (17D)
9479.3 (22.6D)
10479.3 (22.6D)
11599.1 (28.33D)
12599.1 (28.33D)

The average is 54.8 damage and a near 100% chance of at least one hit. The average damage is about 2.5x the hit points of an average traveller character and the defender would need defensive DMS of -4 or better from cover or evasion for the average outcome to be less than a 1-shot kill. The effective range for a Gauss rifle under the Striker RAW is 600m. The stats for book 1/4 are just as bad if not worse.

I'm not making any arguments about in-game concepts or who might use what weapons in what context. This is purely a critique of the mechanics taken from the POV of a typical campaign based around a bunch of yobs in a scout ship. There are significant balance issues in the RAW and I don't see that the argument you've put forward refutes this.
__________________
My imaginary component makes me complex. This also means I'm allowed to eat quiche.

Last edited by nobby-w; September 26th, 2019 at 02:30 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old September 26th, 2019, 02:17 PM
AnotherDilbert AnotherDilbert is offline
Citizen: SOC-14
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Stockholm 🇸🇪
Posts: 2,170
Gallery : 0
AnotherDilbert Citizen+AnotherDilbert Citizen+AnotherDilbert Citizen+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nobby-w View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnotherDilbert View Post
Gauss rifles are meant to fight combat armour and battle dress:

ACRs are meant to fight cloth-type armour:
Are you trying to argue that gauss rifles are not overpowered because they're intended to be used against armoured targets?
Yes.

As I tried to point out the Gauss rifle is used on the battlefield together with and against combat armour and battle dress.

The ACR is used together with and against CES.

Evaluating a TL-12 Gauss rifle based on its performance against TL-6 cloth armour isn't relevant.

So the relevant comparison is an ACR vs. CES compared with a Gauss rifle vs. Combat Armour. I haven't bothered doing the calculations.

I did similar calculations for the humble auto-rifle and promptly abandoned the LBB2 combat system as unworkable.
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old September 26th, 2019, 05:53 PM
AnotherDilbert AnotherDilbert is offline
Citizen: SOC-14
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Stockholm 🇸🇪
Posts: 2,170
Gallery : 0
AnotherDilbert Citizen+AnotherDilbert Citizen+AnotherDilbert Citizen+
Default

Sorry, I missed the most important part of your post.

Quote:
Originally Posted by nobby-w View Post
I'm not making any arguments about in-game concepts or who might use what weapons in what context. This is purely a critique of the mechanics taken from the POV of a typical campaign based around a bunch of yobs in a scout ship. There are significant balance issues in the RAW and I don't see that the argument you've put forward refutes this.
I quite agree, but that is already true for an auto-rifle, or basically any other automatic weapon.

That is why I abandoned the LBB2 system and used Striker instead.
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old September 26th, 2019, 08:49 PM
nobby-w nobby-w is offline
Citizen: SOC-13
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: The High Weald.
Posts: 707
Gallery : 10
nobby-w Citizen+nobby-w Citizen+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnotherDilbert View Post
[ . . . ]
That is why I abandoned the LBB2 system and used Striker instead.
Striker still has balance issues of this sort - the example above was from Striker. I used Striker for much the same reasons as you describe, but the Integration with Traveller RAW still need quite a bit of nerfing. Combinations like gauss rifles and cloth armour are much more typical of adventurers than (say) combat armour and I've seen loads of attacks doing 24, 30, 36D of damage without the player necessarily rolling outlandishly high. Even the humble shotgun is pretty frightening under Striker RAW, not to mention the autoshotgun.

In practice, I did a fair bit of nerfing to re-balance - trimming dex mods to +1, trimming autofire bonuses a bit, capping positive DMs on the personal wound table to half the weapon's penetration for armour piercing rounds, enhancing evasion and cover bonuses and so forth. I also added a richer set of rules for getting surprise and using tactics and recon skill to improve the effects of evasion, cover and initiative.

The resulting balance, although an improvement, is still pretty lethal. The ability to score multiple hits and wide variation in the possible damage makes even the lowliest of small arms a potential one-shot kill. One still has to be circumspect about what you equip antagonists with unless you want your party to spend a lot of time rolling new characters.
__________________
My imaginary component makes me complex. This also means I'm allowed to eat quiche.
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old September 26th, 2019, 09:41 PM
AnotherDilbert AnotherDilbert is offline
Citizen: SOC-14
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Stockholm 🇸🇪
Posts: 2,170
Gallery : 0
AnotherDilbert Citizen+AnotherDilbert Citizen+AnotherDilbert Citizen+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nobby-w View Post
Striker still has balance issues of this sort - the example above was from Striker. I used Striker for much the same reasons as you describe, but the Integration with Traveller RAW still need quite a bit of nerfing.
I was quite liberal with cover and concealment DMs. I reckoned anyone standing around in the open in a firefight deserved whatever they got.

Keeping the fire out of effective range decreases lethality. If the players like gauss rifles too much engage them from extended range with lasers.

The occasional enemy with better combat armour (hence more or less immune to gauss rifles) can also make the players look for diversified weapons capabilities.

But, yes, combat tended to be quite dangerous, so was something to be avoided...
Reply With Quote
  #76  
Old September 28th, 2019, 03:26 AM
Condottiere Condottiere is online now
Citizen: SOC-14
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,540
Gallery : 0
Condottiere Citizen++Condottiere Citizen++Condottiere Citizen++Condottiere Citizen++
Default

At default, gauss rifles are meant as solutions to what current personnel protective gear then available.

You could use cheaper darts to deal with anticipated unarmoured opposition, which includes the benefit of being lighter and smaller.
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old September 30th, 2019, 12:00 PM
whartung whartung is offline
Citizen: SOC-14
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,591
Gallery : 0
whartung Citizen+whartung Citizen+whartung Citizen+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnotherDilbert View Post
Why would anyone bother to use hi-tech gauss weapons to mow down unarmoured troops (or more likely civilians?) when low tech machine guns are much more effective?
Run what you brung.

As they say, "if you're expecting trouble, bring a rifle". Why would you not want the most effective tool available in a situation like this.

I just don't see folks saying "I don't expect THAT much trouble" to bring something less, when all things considered, it's ergonomically not that much different from the lesser rifles. It's not like deciding to take a common rifle vs a belt fed machine gun.

Plus there's simply manual of arms, familiarity, etc. Use what you know.

By this time, there are billions of GRs scattered hither and yon across the imperium. Unless the local infrastructure simply can't support them (magazines break, can't be recharged, ammo is only made on that ONE world that's the Imperial Armory), I'd expect to find them everywhere that has contact with Imperial travelers.
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old September 30th, 2019, 04:12 PM
AnotherDilbert AnotherDilbert is offline
Citizen: SOC-14
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Stockholm 🇸🇪
Posts: 2,170
Gallery : 0
AnotherDilbert Citizen+AnotherDilbert Citizen+AnotherDilbert Citizen+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by whartung View Post
Run what you brung.

As they say, "if you're expecting trouble, bring a rifle". Why would you not want the most effective tool available in a situation like this.
Even easier to mount a MG on your vehicle.

A rifle is a good compromise, but only really optimal at medium range. Indoors you probably want a shorter weapon. In space you want a recoilless weapon.

Since a gauss rifle would be banned more or less anywhere with a measurable law level, you can't expect to be able to carry them outside of wilderness, or possibly the starport. A hunting rifle or shotgun is much more likely to be legal, if perhaps a bit conspicuous in startown...

An SMG is more convenient to carry, and a handgun much more convenient. A weapon you actually brought is much better than an inconvenient weapon you didn't bring.

If you really expect trouble you may want heavier weapons...


Quote:
Originally Posted by whartung View Post
By this time, there are billions of GRs scattered hither and yon across the imperium. Unless the local infrastructure simply can't support them (magazines break, can't be recharged, ammo is only made on that ONE world that's the Imperial Armory), I'd expect to find them everywhere that has contact with Imperial travelers.
Agreed, there will be piles of surplus gauss rifles available, just as there will be piles of surplus laser rifles, ACRs, and assault rifles from lower tech worlds.

And Travellers will probably prefer gauss weapons since they are measurably (slightly) better. Unless they expect to use them in space.

But that also means that they and their enemies really will want to find some reasonable armour. Running around naked in a high-tech firefight is not advisable. I expect there will be reasonably armoured surplus high-tech vacc suits available from the same Imperial sources.

And when everyone has armour you haven't changed much except created a little bit of power inflation in the game.

But if the players insist on carrying gauss rifles everywhere they can, I wouldn't try to stop them, just make sure the opposition is also reasonably armed.
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old October 3rd, 2019, 10:23 AM
CaptRet CaptRet is offline
Citizen: SOC-12
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 206
Gallery : 0
CaptRet Citizen+CaptRet Citizen+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnotherDilbert View Post
Even easier to mount a MG on your vehicle.

A rifle is a good compromise, but only really optimal at medium range. Indoors you probably want a shorter weapon. In space you want a recoilless weapon.

Since a gauss rifle would be banned more or less anywhere with a measurable law level, you can't expect to be able to carry them outside of wilderness, or possibly the starport. A hunting rifle or shotgun is much more likely to be legal, if perhaps a bit conspicuous in startown...

An SMG is more convenient to carry, and a handgun much more convenient. A weapon you actually brought is much better than an inconvenient weapon you didn't bring.

If you really expect trouble you may want heavier weapons...



Agreed, there will be piles of surplus gauss rifles available, just as there will be piles of surplus laser rifles, ACRs, and assault rifles from lower tech worlds.

And Travellers will probably prefer gauss weapons since they are measurably (slightly) better. Unless they expect to use them in space.

But that also means that they and their enemies really will want to find some reasonable armour. Running around naked in a high-tech firefight is not advisable. I expect there will be reasonably armoured surplus high-tech vacc suits available from the same Imperial sources.

And when everyone has armour you haven't changed much except created a little bit of power inflation in the game.

But if the players insist on carrying gauss rifles everywhere they can, I wouldn't try to stop them, just make sure the opposition is also reasonably armed.
The heavier vacc suit is a good way around armor restrictions and law levels - while combat armor is definitely military in nature and you could fall afoul of the local gendarmerie, even a boarding vacc suit is ultimately a vacc suit (just happens to have armor that puts it in the class of lower tech level combat armor). "This officer ? Why it's my vacc suit - very protective from radiation, don't you know." Of course, there will be many situations where a vacc suit would be inappropriate (can't really see one strolling down the high street in a highly popluated, strict law level metropolis). But out in boonies ...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Armor benefits degrade jaz0nj4ckal Classic Traveller 22 December 7th, 2013 09:45 PM
Additional Mustering-Out Benefits Golan2072 Classic Traveller 31 June 9th, 2007 11:06 PM
Errata - Mustering Out Benefits Falkayn T20 - Traveller for the D20 System 15 December 31st, 2002 10:43 PM
Traveller Mustering Out Benefits dmoran T20 - Traveller for the D20 System 2 December 31st, 2002 12:17 PM

This website and its contents are copyright ©2010- Far Future Enterprises. All rights reserved. Traveller is a registered trademark of Far Future Enterprises .
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright (c) 2010-2013, Far Future Enterprises. All Rights Reserved.